girls with wet nikers (320 kb full frontal)

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- girls with wet nikers (320 kb full frontal)

Posted by covert23 on Feb-12-2006 11:16:

girls with wet nikers (320 kb full frontal)

girls with wet nikers a new creation by covert23...please comment....good/bad all feedback helps.....full 320kb...
six minuites long....hope its an improvement on my last choon
please respond people ........thanks michael.......

heres the link......you might have to paste it into your browser.. sorry for the inconvenience

http://s62.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=1Z017JBC8PP972VMI4ECP5IX6F

hope you like .....

Posted by covert23 on Feb-12-2006 13:36:

feedback wanted

yes/no it works/it doesnt some feedback please much apreciated

Posted by Chronosis on Feb-12-2006 14:52:

Heh. Be patient.

Well, it's a quite hard track. I have friends who would surely jam like crazy to this at their all-night, on-speed, traktor sessions. Not exactly my taste though.

Posted by Rinster on Feb-12-2006 15:44:

first thing that came to mind is that this track distorts a lot. try and fix that intro was a bit short i find it it needs a bit more work, overall it was quite ok. the ending also needs a lil attention. but dont give up, keep up the good work!

Posted by covert23 on Feb-12-2006 18:09:

will take another look at its distortion levels.... the intro and outro thanks for the ears chaps

Posted by dmitri_vaganov on Feb-15-2006 03:51:

I like the hard sounding elemnts in the track. I think it's missing a structure. No ups and downs. Add more effects.

Posted by Semirk on Feb-15-2006 15:07:

Hey,

One observation from the intro from a personal point of view is that things build a bit on the quick side, maybe try letting things breathe a bit more by introducing them more subtlely. Really liking the stage after 2 mins, the track really comes into its own here and nothing comes in too unexpectedly. The percussion stays the same from what I've heard so maybe a bit of variation on that front would be good.

Production wise everything sounds good just a couple of things that need ironing out really.

Posted by BOOsTER on Feb-15-2006 15:51:

cool, but give it some more breathing room

also I think it clips

didn't check though

Posted by iloop on Feb-15-2006 23:31:

from the spectrum analyser it looks like it hits some clipping... other than that it has some good melodic elements and is harder w/ the synths which i like, but the buildup/arrangement side could be worked on a bit... Outro/into could be more dj friendly too if you introduce/outroduce elements more smoothly.

YAR thats my critical r-view

Posted by ralpheeee on Feb-16-2006 11:59:

I realy liked it dude. Much better than my track.
That chord that keeps on playing in the first two mins get a bit repetitve except when u do that progresion which i thought was good, you could always use that progresion a few more times.Maybe even loop that progresion.
Heeps cool track keep up the good work.

Posted by covert23 on Feb-17-2006 00:50:

thanks

ill do some more work on the intro and the clipping,thanks for the comments...........the more pears of ears the better anybody else got comments much apreciated....thanks.....

Posted by nhibberd on Feb-17-2006 01:27:

Listening...

Where did you get those effect samples from? All in all, well produced imo. A little experience won't go amiss though. I must say it isn't something I would buy. It would probably fit well in someones tech set as a trancy interlude, but not on a busy night.

Lot's of standard techniques in the track that are done millions of times. Like the reverse cymbol. If you want to earn a little more respect for the track work on that. Try adding a revers reverb to the cymbol in place of just reversing it. Or even better if you get some noise going and go crazy with some filters.

Another thing is that elements seems to just start and stop in the sequence. Try filtering something in or creating an introduction to a riff.

Overall, my taste is a bit different. I prefer more clean and harmonious sounds.

Ok, that's it. Sorry for righting a book here. Be sure to click the 'review' link in my signature.

kind regards,

Charlie Darwin

Posted by covert23 on Feb-17-2006 13:47:

thanks for the info

ill work on it some more and try some other efx...its all about knowledge of production and its a still a bid learning curve for me..
thanks for the ears on this tune...

Posted by Rayan on Feb-17-2006 23:44:

Listening..

Sounds good. i dont like the perc that comes in. the drum! african drum think... the lead is very dry imo. and could need some tweak imo! and think of your final mxdown, mastering of sounds! Everything here is overgoing each other! thats why you dont get a good sounds quality.

the rave lead in the middle of everything ruin all! take that out

A little advise; make kick and bass first of all. and make them fit well togeter. and you have to stay notice, and hear that it clips/ distortion on the sound.

Well thats what I have to say for now! just think about that Telling you to be nice...

Posted by Caleb on Feb-19-2006 03:51:

nice and hard. liking it. about 2:40 got alittle too hard for a second lol.

the changes are a bit sudden at the first of the song.

i can see where some ppl might say you need more up and down, but it didnt really effect me.

about 5:00, i think i recognize that effect from an old Contra game [NES] lol. laser shot. maybe its an atari game.

yea, i can definatly say that just a few edges of the song needs to be softened. that would prolly improve it 15%.