TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- BMP change FTL


Posted by Aquarian on Feb-17-2006 15:38:

BMP change FTL

Am I the only one who has this weird obsessive hate for bpm changes? If I'm listening to a track preview on beatport, and it's the best thing I've ever heard, but then there's a subtle 2-3 second BPM change, I won't even consider buying it, and I won't ever look at that track again.


Posted by Fearless One on Feb-17-2006 15:59:

i'm afraid it's only you


Posted by Wyndham on Feb-17-2006 16:01:

lol i doubt that, no one in their right mind would make a song with a bpm change in it.
i think your are the only one


Posted by Vainqueur on Feb-17-2006 21:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Wyndham
lol i doubt that, no one in their right mind would make a song with a bpm change in it.
i think your are the only one


French Kiss.


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Feb-17-2006 22:35:

I think what you mean is when people add in an element at a faster rate, such as moving from eighth notes to sixteenths. And if that pisses you off, well... get used to it. It's used a lot in trance as an alternative to the key change in an effort to give the song an "uplifting" feel.


Posted by basd on Feb-17-2006 22:58:

Two pretty well-known hardcore tracks that feature a not-so-subtle BPM change as well:

French Connection - French Connection
DJ Dano - 120-9000 BPM (and yes, that one lives up to its name)


Posted by sykadelik on Feb-17-2006 23:02:

Jam & Spoon - Follow Me has a ridiculous pitch change.


Posted by Nrg2Nfinit on Feb-17-2006 23:08:

theres some eurodance tracks that do this.. champion sound the warning as well lol


Posted by Protege on Feb-17-2006 23:09:

Re: BMP change FTL

quote:
Originally posted by Aquarian
Am I the only one who has this weird obsessive hate for bpm changes? If I'm listening to a track preview on beatport, and it's the best thing I've ever heard, but then there's a subtle 2-3 second BPM change, I won't even consider buying it, and I won't ever look at that track again.


what song?


Posted by idoru on Feb-18-2006 08:06:

Moby - Thousand

It goes from slow, to hella fast, to slow, and back again. It's apparently in the Guinness Book of Records as the fastest track ever recorded, although I don't know if it holds up to that standard nowadays or not.


Posted by kadomony on Feb-18-2006 08:35:

BK & Andy Farley - Accelerate.
clip:
http://www.audiojelly.com/mirror/in...ils.cfm&id=4434



the review
"144 - 228 beats per minute in one tune.

"Impossible!" I hear the cries; "It'll never work!" shouts the crowd. "Ahhh," I reply "it's by Andy Farley and BK. Then all I hear is silence because everybody knows whatever this pair attempts; it works. Not only does it work but also it turns out to be one of the biggest records of the year.

The tune itself starts with a tribal feel, layering lush percussion and building the foundations of something that you know is going to kick off in style. Add a Steven Hawking style vocal and things really start to pick up. The bass kicks in and the bpms start to pick up pace. The track keeps a modest and minimal approach still building further before reaching it 228 destination. Nukleuz's most successful production duo reintroduce the vocal and begin yet another tantalizing break that concludes in giving us the track in its full glory. Unfortunately from here on in the energy is all but spent and the track plods along with no real ambition. However, that should not deter you from getting this groundbreaking piece of Hard Dance."


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Feb-18-2006 09:04:

Tbh Accelerate was a bit crap, aside from the novelty factor, and even after the huge breakdown (for hard house,) I don't feel it recovers from the slow down to 150 bpm or whatver again.


Posted by montana on Feb-18-2006 12:18:

actually i have to disagree, if anything, some tracks are really shit at their original speed. some examples
Blaze - When i fall in love (antiloop remix) sounds way to fast as it's original speed, it's a darkish house record and don't need to played at prog speeds.
Remy & Roland Klinkenberg - Till Ya Drop! is way to slow at it's original pace. it's a tech(trance) record and needs to be played at +6 atleast


Posted by Redd on Feb-18-2006 12:53:

quote:
Originally posted by montana
actually i have to disagree, if anything, some tracks are really shit at their original speed. some examples
Blaze - When i fall in love (antiloop remix) sounds way to fast as it's original speed, it's a darkish house record and don't need to played at prog speeds.
Remy & Roland Klinkenberg - Till Ya Drop! is way to slow at it's original pace. it's a tech(trance) record and needs to be played at +6 atleast


They're talking about bmp-change in the track itself, as in parts of the track going faster or slower, not increasing or decreasing the bmp of the whole track. There are many examples of tracks that sounds better when they are pitched up or down


Posted by Lunar Phase 7 on Feb-18-2006 18:06:

Alex Morph's Mix Of Halcyon needs to be plus 4 at least I reckon!

Same With The Mystery - Fever


Posted by Jeremy H on Feb-18-2006 18:31:

BMP != BPM



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.