TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Allen & Heat xzone 62 vs. Pioneer DJM600.Which to Choose?


Posted by DJ Ezzian on Jan-26-2002 23:39:

Question Allen & Heat xzone 62 vs. Pioneer DJM600.Which to Choose?

Any tips about what to choose Allen & Heat xzone 62 or Pioneer DJM600??
I would like to get you opinion about theese mixers.
What is good/bad with them?

Thanx


Posted by dazzed on Jan-27-2002 04:56:

iv seen em both.. used a 600, never used the 62 but i read allot about em both while researching mixers.. i wound up getting a vestax due to $$ issues...

but anyway the main difference is how you mix. the style and the type of music..

the 62 has a 4 channel EQ which is cool because it gives you a wider mixing ability, but you won't notice this at a amateur level. other than that things are more or less normal.. i think you can custom change the fader, if i remember correctly (i very well may not), but most trance mixers don't use a fader anyhow. i'm not sure what other diff advantages it has, but i know its a quality mixer

the 600 is 3 channel.. and its main advantages are it has effects, bpm, and a 3 select fader.. like i said fader doesn't matter much.. bpm is kindof dumb cuz it only has 1 bpm so u can't see the two records bpm's side by side.. but you shouldn't be using a bpm anyway. the effects are kinda cool, and its nice that they are built in. I don't like effects tho, cuz i don't think they are very musical. but i know house djs like it allot..

basicly, if ur an amateur (as most of us are =) and your looking for a good mixer with bpm to help you out at times, and effects to screw around with go for the 600. otherwise i'd say get the 62 cuz when you get experienced at mixing i think the 4 channels will help you out even more, and the mixer itself is damn quality.

personally i'd say go for the 62, but i don't like effects or bpm or any of that.

dazzed


Posted by j_spot on Jan-27-2002 10:15:

very well done dazzed, but you forgot to mention that the Xone has 1 effect also. and while it is only 1 effect, it kills anything Ive heard from a 600. Its the VCF filter, and its got a hi pass, loss pass and notch pass(I think thats what its called) these are soo musical and drive me wild, it sounds like they have em in the song too many times by kai tracid. sooo nice.

the A&H also has better construction, vertically mounted boards as opposed to horizontal in the 600(so that any spillage runs off) and the sound quality from an A&H is much better than from a 600. A&H makes some of the finest audio equip in the world. This is for sure one of em


Posted by YuVaL on Jan-27-2002 12:31:

k... mostly said it all..

im gonna get the 600 mixer from pioneer.. altough im not going to use that crap effects & bpm..
its 4 channels not 3...
the allen & heath os a very strong build mixer with one of the best qualitys out there.. its for more expirenced DJs as said b4.. i saw gielen use the 62 in TE 2001.. if u want a strong mixer that will last u go with the 62
if u feel like a starting out with a nice small mixer mixer i'd go with the pcv - 175 from vestax
saves u money & its worth it
pioneer 600 is a gr8 mixer 2 dont get me wrong.. its simple with eq for each channel
looks good & has effects
its really up 2


Posted by dazzed on Jan-27-2002 14:03:

If i had the money i'd get the 62..

but the prices are the thing.

pioneer djm600 - about 1000+
vestax pcv275 - 400 or so (my mixer)
a&h - xone 62 1200 or so...

honestly if you are in the 1grand price range already i'd get the 62.. but also when spending that much money keep in mind don't blow it cuz your gonna need to spend allot on records.. i'd say after 1 year of mixing, of which 7 months i really actually mixed (first 5 months i didnt take it seriously).

i spent 1 grand on tables, 250 on a shitty djm-300, 400 on an effects box, 300 on needles. i realized the effects were useless (esp since i couldn't beat match yet!) so i sold that and the mixer and got a vestax, and a coffin so i could bring it all to school. so i'v spent about 2 grand on my setup.. then i've spent id say 3-4 grand already on records!!! but i'm pretty damn broke right now

just remember u need $$ for records too!


Posted by DJ Chrono on Jan-30-2002 02:25:

gemini mixers own.... .. . j/k


Posted by YuVaL on Jan-30-2002 12:26:

although i dont think ppl will agree with me

i just watched 2-3 clips

tiesto live @ dance valley
pvd live @ love parade
&
gielen live @ te 2001

both tiesto & pvd used the pioneer djm 600
& gielen used the allen & heath 62

i think more clubs, etc.. use Pioneer
i think allen & heath is 4 big events such as te , innercity

etc..


Posted by Scorchio on Jan-30-2002 15:52:

Pioneer DJM-600 Mixer is a good choice
Yet A&H Are well known as the best mixers in the world.
I Suggest you start off with the Vestax PCV-175 mixer, I Have it.
It has a full equalizer for each channel, fully adjustable headphone monitoring system,
it looks great and it produces massive sound with great quality.
DJ-Energy:
Its definitley not "A nice small mixer"
Its Large and it also has entries for effects processors.
All and all the PCV-175 is well worth the money, it costs a little less than 600 dollars here in israel.


Posted by djskylz on Jan-30-2002 17:49:

ok, I live in the netherlands, en gielen used a djm600 at trance energy september 2001 (i was there), and at trance energy they used a Dateq LPM 7.3 (i have this baby 2, the only problem for some people me be the price, $1400,-) but i think u can mix with both mixers....

Greetz Maarten


Posted by dazzed on Jan-30-2002 19:44:

personally i think its the best bet to buy a quality but simple mixer, then just get some practice here and there on the special features of other mixes..

that way if u wind up with an american dj 2 channel mixer u can still tear things up (ahahahaaaa).

and if u get a chance to use a nice mixer you can still tear things up.. im just sayin u don't wanna rely on kill switches or an effect, then some day wind up w/o it...

dazzzzzzzzzzzed


Posted by magicsushi on Jan-31-2002 13:13:

What about the A&H Xone:32?

Anybody used it?


Posted by YuVaL on Jan-31-2002 13:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Scorchio
Pioneer DJM-600 Mixer is a good choice
Yet A&H Are well known as the best mixers in the world.
I Suggest you start off with the Vestax PCV-175 mixer, I Have it.
It has a full equalizer for each channel, fully adjustable headphone monitoring system,
it looks great and it produces massive sound with great quality.
DJ-Energy:
Its definitley not "A nice small mixer"
Its Large and it also has entries for effects processors.
All and all the PCV-175 is well worth the money, it costs a little less than 600 dollars here in israel.


okay dude calm ur ass done
i didn't say it was small
it is a very good mixer.. the sound quality is supperb.. i like it


Posted by DJ LIQUID on Jan-31-2002 15:37:

I myself have the Pioneer DJM600 and i absolutely love it....its been my dream mixer for as long as i can remember

I personally would recommend it

I the faders are clean the EQs are incredible.........you will not be sorry if you purchase this mixer

As for the A&H mixer.....i have never personally used it...it looks pretty nice........i think i might end up buying one so I can have both the 600 & 62 on different setups

Ive heard excellent things about both mixers and im sure you'll make the right decision.

>>>>>One other thing.......i would suggest that you go to the store and play around with both of them. Which ever you feel most comfortable with you should go for.


Posted by YuVaL on Jan-31-2002 17:08:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ LIQUID
I myself have the Pioneer DJM600 and i absolutely love it....its been my dream mixer for as long as i can remember

I personally would recommend it

I the faders are clean the EQs are incredible.........you will not be sorry if you purchase this mixer

As for the A&H mixer.....i have never personally used it...it looks pretty nice........i think i might end up buying one so I can have both the 600 & 62 on different setups

Ive heard excellent things about both mixers and im sure you'll make the right decision.

>>>>>One other thing.......i would suggest that you go to the store and play around with both of them. Which ever you feel most comfortable with you should go for.


*cough*rich basterd*cough*


Posted by Jocker on Feb-01-2002 00:52:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ-Energy
although i dont think ppl will agree with me

i just watched 2-3 clips

tiesto live @ dance valley
pvd live @ love parade
&
gielen live @ te 2001

both tiesto & pvd used the pioneer djm 600
& gielen used the allen & heath 62

i think more clubs, etc.. use Pioneer
i think allen & heath is 4 big events such as te , innercity

etc..


they don't bring their own mixers to raves, they play whatever they are provided with. if, say, paul van dyk would play at trance energy after gielen, he would have used 62s too.

as for personal opinion, i think 600 are VERY overpriced. a&h are much more quality. many times using even a 4-channel mixer at the club is not an option, cause you got (almost always) three decks, three cdplayers, a sampler, a dat-recorder, a line for mic and so on... 19" rack mixers are much more widespread in clubs because they give more ability to expand the technical base in future.


Posted by DJ LIQUID on Feb-01-2002 02:47:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ-Energy


*cough*rich basterd*cough*


Posted by fastmp3 on Feb-01-2002 03:32:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ-Energy


*cough*rich basterd*cough*




look who's talking when are u buying ur equip. Yuvie ?


Posted by Dzokayi on Feb-06-2002 03:24:

DJMs have plenty of inputs...

quote:
many times using even a 4-channel mixer at the club is not an option, cause you got (almost always) three decks, three cdplayers, a sampler, a dat-recorder, a line for mic and so on...


I think this is a common misconception.... the Pioneer DJM 500 & 600 can both handle this type of setup with ease - From Pioneer's website:

quote:
Two MIC inputs: MAIN located on top panel, SUB on rear panel. Other inputs: 2 CD, 2 LINE, 3 PHONO.


The DJMs have send/return for an outboard effects unit also...

Cheers

Dzokayi


Posted by Dj Thy on Feb-09-2002 23:06:

I own a Xone:62 and well, lemme say I really feel limited when spinning on DJM's. The sound quality from the Xone is way better, ok you don't get integrated BPM counters (uhm, ok don't need those no problem), sampler or fx (except the awesome VCF filter of course, this filter is just a blast to work with ). I'm more of a guy that wants absolute quality of every component (even if I have to work my ass off to be able to afford it). So if I want a sampler or an effector, I'll get them apart.
The 4 band EQ is just awesome to work with, and believe me, once you used that, you won't want to return to the "old fashioned" 3band.

Don't get me wrong, the DJM's are nice machines, very nice even. They have everything in one, and are very easy to handle. This is probably the reason they're so widely used in clubs and gigs. Be aware that the Xones aren't around for that long. They already got the reputation of belonging to the best sounding mixers of the world, but as you may know most companies (renting, shops, clubs) don't change their gear just for that. But some clubs are getting Xones in now (Fuse just to name one, they used Rodec MX180mkII's for years).

Anyway you can't really go wrong with either one of those mixers, but for me the Xone:62 tops all of the rest. No compromise, pure quality.

PS : I believe that if you use the send/return connections on the DJM600 the fx/sampler gets overridden.


Posted by hapamoto on Feb-10-2002 10:27:

i just got back from my friend's house and we were playing w/ his brand spankin' new djm600 and let me tell you that it fucking kicks ass!.. i can't speak for the 62 because i've never used it but IMO you can't go wrong w/ the djm600.. its a beautiful mixer, the effects kick ass, i don't even look at the bpm counter becuase it seems to fluctuate and although it probably gives you a ballpark figure of the bpm's, i don't think it is perfectly accurate.. but its really easy to use (as far as effects are concerned) and all of the components are built well, the knobs turn super-smooth and the x-fader and volume controls feel really comfortable and smooth too.. from my experience w/ it, i feel like i have total control, and i have never used a mixer that had effects on it before tonight and maybe through the first song i was kinda overwhelmed but i got used to it quickly.. you will have total fun w/ the djm600.. but again i can't say anything about the 62 because i've never used it.


Posted by Dj Thy on Feb-11-2002 14:14:

Btw, forgot to tell. At first the pre-EQ cue system (you don't hear the effect of the EQ in your phones) felt strange to me. But now if I look back on it, I feel it's easier to set my initial EQ settings to keep a better continuity when mixing the tunes in.


Posted by sot on Feb-12-2002 03:17:

I have 2 questions...What do the VCF filters do on the Xone 62 mixer?

2. My fav effect on the djm 600 is flanger! i dont know why but that effect is soo cool sounding. Is there like an effects machines that arent to expensive, the pioneer efx 500 is alot i dont need all thoise effects anyway but is there any effects module that just has flanger on it? like a flanger module that is like 50 bux?


Posted by reemo on Feb-12-2002 08:58:

quote:
Originally posted by magicsushi
What about the A&H Xone:32?

Anybody used it?


I am a proud owner of the Allen & Heath Xone 32. Having been released after the 62 the 32 has many better features packaged into a smaller cheaper unit.

Disadvantages of 32:
* only 3 channels - 1 channel seperate from the cross fader
* only 3 eq's per channel

Advantages of 32:
* VCF slider - this thing is nuts! its like having 2 crossfaders, 1 for mixing and 1 for effects!
* Adjustable curve on the cross fader
* Reverse hampster switch for cross fader
* Punch/Kill buttons
* 4 x Filter Recall memory buttons
* Filter LFO with Tap tempo button
* CUE crossfader for checking your mix

Having used a 62 in the club I have dj'd at for nearly 2 years I would have to say I like my 32 more. The effects layout is better and you can do more crazy shit with it... check out www.xone.co.uk

I also had a Pioneer 600 before I was robbed and it got stolen. The Pioneer 600 was a load of shit! I sold my lovely Vestax PMC17A to get a 600 and as soon as I made my first CD on it I cried; the sound was noticably worse. The pioneer will make your mix sound dull. I find it so hard to believe that people can be so damn high that they think these mixers are acceptable... The sound output is filthy and the effects are filled with crackles, pops and all sorts of crud. Need i say any more?


The xone 32 sells here for $1600AUS ($800 US) and the 600 sells for $2000AUS ($1000 US).
Can anyone tell me why any sain person would pass up the quality of Allen and Heath for a piece of shit that costs $400 ($200 US) more?

Anyway I hope there is some nice info there for ya.. and I hope i havn't been to heated about my disgust of the pioneer. If you want to hear the effects of the Xone 32 please download my cd Atmosphere Hard Trance Vol 2. (I would never have dreamed of using the effects of the pioneer on a cd.. they are usless crap)

http://www.reemo.com.au/Mixes/Reemo...ce_CD_Vol_2.mp3

Reemo
www.reemo.com.au



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.