trance/commercial - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- trance/commercial

Posted by Zombie0915 on Apr-06-2006 14:14:

trance/commercial

its official, the magazine says so:

Posted by mzvirbulis on Apr-06-2006 14:25:

wtf

why did they have to take it to another degree further honestly its not commercial f^&*ing trance what are they on?

cant they call it just trance! ok i dont really care anyways but im

i think maybe because most have all entered into some side of the TRANCE/COMMERCIAL side of things thats all.

Posted by wrzonance on Apr-06-2006 14:35:

imagine that. wow.

Posted by thoughtlessjex on Apr-06-2006 16:54:

So wait, don't they mean trance/house?

Posted by RapidFire on Apr-06-2006 16:59:

carl cox is techno! benny benassi is progressive!

gimps..

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Apr-06-2006 17:02:

It'll be bloody BT.

Posted by Zombie0915 on Apr-06-2006 18:33:

heh, you know how mags can get with these classifications, but really, every one of those names on that page plays gigs at those 30 dollar a head superclubs, how is any one of them less commercial than another?

Posted by Sykonee on Apr-06-2006 18:42:

So long as euro dance keeps trying to pass itself as trance, the association will remain.

It didn't help when so many pundits figured anything with a super sawwave synth was trance.

Posted by Axolotyl on Apr-07-2006 00:49:

quote:
Originally posted by thoughtlessjex
So wait, don't they mean trance/house?

I thought it was electro-trance??

Posted by Stunade on Apr-07-2006 01:51:

CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE? YOU'RE FUCKING KIDDING! Who's next, M.I.K.E.?

Posted by Zombie0915 on Apr-09-2006 16:49:

this is from the pages of BPM magazine, I am not sure what the article was about or what issue is was(I do know it is a recent publication), but perhaps one of you has a copy of it and can give us a little more info, since it seems people are wanting to know a more about where this came from.