TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Enjoy sitting in your inflatable pool on a hot day? Well forget about it!
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Jayx1 on May-09-2006 22:14:

Enjoy sitting in your inflatable pool on a hot day? Well forget about it!

Oakville has enacted a bylaw that says you cannot have an inflatable pool unless you have fences, gates, locks, and a $50 permit. No, I am not making this up. And apparently other municipalities in the GTA including Toronto are thinking about doing the same.

I guess it's just another bylaw that ensures that all you can do with your house is eat, sleep and pay taxes.

Only in Canada!

quote:

To reflect the latest trends in pool design, Council approved a new Pool Enclosure Bylaw and fee structure for all forms of pools, including temporary above-ground inflatable pools, landscape pond features and hot tubs.
According to the new bylaw approved at Monday night's Planning and Development Council meeting, permits are required for most forms of pool structures, including the popular inflatable pool -- fast becoming the trend in backyards across the GTA.

According to local retailers, more than 1000 of these pools were sold in the Oakville area within the last few years. Of those 1000 that may have made their way to backyards in Oakville, only four were filed with the Town.

"Inflatable pools are incredibly affordable and that's the reason why we're seeing an influx of them across the Town," explained John Kwast, Director of Development Services for the Town of Oakville. "But just like any pool, inflatable ones are a safety risk if owners aren't protecting them properly."

The Town's Pool Enclosure By-law, 2006-071 states that pools must be enclosed by a fence, restricted by a lockable gate if the depth capacity exceeds 60 cm (2 ft) and adhere to the appropriate setbacks from the property line. These enforced regulations are also applicable to backyard landscaping ponds, often overlooked as potential safety threats. Hot tubs require lockable lids if the property is not fenced or gated.

Residents are required to apply for a permit for all forms of pools. The fee for temporary pool permits has been reduced to a one-time charge of $50. This fee covers the administration work necessary to allow staff to meet with the homeowner, explain the bylaw restrictions and ensure that a proper design drawing depicting the location of the pool is filed with the Town. The drawing then goes on record to serve as a reference for when the pool is reinstalled the following year.

Another option and for an additional $50, staff will conduct a single inspection of the property to ensure compliance. Mr. Kwast advises that "although this option is not required, it is recommended."

According to the Lifesaving Society of Canada, drowning is the third leading cause of accidental death in Canada for people 60 years of age and under. In fact, year after year the data shows that the majority of people who drown have no intention of going into the water. Their immersion is sudden and unexpected.

"Not only are we encouraging homeowners to educate themselves about pool enclosures, but we're asking local retailers to let their customers know about this bylaw as well," says Mr. Kwast. "Our goal is to meet with local retailers in Oakville and have information about pool enclosures in all stores. An informed public is an aware public."


Posted by HypnotEyez on May-09-2006 22:24:

WTF?!


Posted by Sasha on May-09-2006 22:26:

ROFL


Posted by Stingray on May-09-2006 22:28:

Good!!!

Then some neighbour kid cant get in your pool and drown!!


Posted by 5hiftn6ears on May-09-2006 22:29:

I don't think it sound that crazy to be honest with you.


Posted by Playa24_7 on May-09-2006 22:32:

NOOOOOOOOOO!! what will become of the pool that was here for the party I had last june!??? lol

drinking and swimming is not recommended
I COULD HAVE DROWN!


Posted by HypnotEyez on May-09-2006 22:38:

^^


Posted by MarkT on May-09-2006 23:02:

now when some kid drowns in a neighbour's inflatable pool, not only with the owner be charged with negligence, they'll be fined under this bylaw too, lol.

I kind of see the intent behind the bylaw...regardless of how dumb it appears.

It's yet another law that won't be actively enforced, but rather gives the city powers should someone complain...and serves to point out that owners ARE responsible if anyone drowns or is injured in their pool if it was not properly fenced in.

yes...another avoidance of responsibility...if some kid falls in your pool, someone should slap that kid's parents...not sue the other homeowner!


Posted by Dancing*Queen on May-09-2006 23:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Playa24_7
NOOOOOOOOOO!! what will become of the pool that was here for the party I had last june!??? lol

drinking and swimming is not recommended
I COULD HAVE DROWN!



LMAO!!

Such a great party Dan....you'd better have another!!


Posted by Fir3start3r on May-10-2006 01:12:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
...another avoidance of responsibility...if some kid falls in your pool, someone should slap that kid's parents...not sue the other homeowner!


+1

No one is responsible for themselves these days it seems...


Posted by shanny on May-10-2006 01:40:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
+1

No one is responsible for themselves these days it seems...


Its pretty rare that children(who this law protects)are ever held responsible for their actions.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-10-2006 04:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Stingray
Good!!!

Then some neighbour kid cant get in your pool and drown!!


If the neighbour's kid is at an age where he or she could drown, then the kid should be looked after by an adult.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-10-2006 04:10:

quote:
Originally posted by shanny
Its pretty rare that children(who this law protects)are ever held responsible for their actions.


but their parents are...


Posted by Jayx1 on May-10-2006 04:12:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
now when some kid drowns in a neighbour's inflatable pool, not only with the owner be charged with negligence, they'll be fined under this bylaw too, lol.

I kind of see the intent behind the bylaw...regardless of how dumb it appears.

It's yet another law that won't be actively enforced, but rather gives the city powers should someone complain...and serves to point out that owners ARE responsible if anyone drowns or is injured in their pool if it was not properly fenced in.

yes...another avoidance of responsibility...if some kid falls in your pool, someone should slap that kid's parents...not sue the other homeowner!



I can see where this law is coming from too. Its yet another feel good bylaw that does nothing but inconvenience the homeowner. And not coincidentally, raises more taxes.

Inflatable pools? COME ON!! I can see this law applying to permanant pools but INFLATABLE ONES??

sheesh!

Whats next? A ban on slip and slides?


Posted by Hantu on May-10-2006 04:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
Whats next? A ban on slip and slides?


I couldn't agree with you more, I mean damn enough of these stupid petty law.


Posted by VERTiG0 on May-10-2006 04:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
If the neighbour's kid is at an age where he or she could drown, then the kid should be looked after by an adult.


Hahah, so this includes children from ages 1 second to adulthood.


Posted by Jem_hadar on May-10-2006 04:27:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
I can see this law applying to permanant pools but INFLATABLE ONES??

sheesh!

Whats next? A ban on slip and slides?


COMPLETELY RIDDICULOUS.


Posted by Stingray on May-10-2006 05:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
If the neighbour's kid is at an age where he or she could drown, then the kid should be looked after by an adult.



Yeah, well guess what. Kids wander. They are little shits who love to get into trouble and do things they arent sypposed to.

Damn this by-law and its attempt at making the world a safer place.


Posted by Jayx1 on May-10-2006 05:29:

quote:
Originally posted by Stingray
Yeah, well guess what. Kids wander. They are little shits who love to get into trouble and do things they arent sypposed to.

Damn this by-law and its attempt at making the world a safer place.


Attempt yes, will it succeed? NOPE.

little shits wander... so where are the parents? Why should i have to suffer because some idiot cant supervise his children?

The law definately has good intentions. But isnt that what the road to hell is paved with?

The government is not there to be our babysitter. And im sick of people who seem to think they are.


Posted by Stingray on May-10-2006 05:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
The government is not there to be our babysitter. And im sick of people who seem to think they are.


No they are not our baby sitter. But I agree that if you have a pool of water where someone (not just a kid but perhaps a handicapped person) could drown in, then it should be protected by a fence and a locking gate.


Posted by Jem_hadar on May-10-2006 05:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1

The government is not there to be our babysitter. And im sick of people who seem to think they are.


support on this!


Posted by loconet on May-10-2006 05:48:

quote:

The answer is if you elect politicians who think you need to be protected from your own stupidity, those politicians may be onto something.


Posted by tatgirl on May-10-2006 12:49:

quote:
Originally posted by Stingray
No they are not our baby sitter. But I agree that if you have a pool of water where someone (not just a kid but perhaps a handicapped person) could drown in, then it should be protected by a fence and a locking gate.


Point is, people should not be tresspassing to begin with.

Hey- there's a HUGE body of water, not protected by any locked fence, and its called LAKE ONTARIO, where thousands of homes back onto it. I hope some homeowner sues the province when their kid drowns in it one day, claiming the gov't shoulda put a fence around it.


Posted by ChemEnhanced on May-10-2006 13:04:

You already have to have an outdoor pool enclosed with a fence. This by-law is not meant for the little kiddie pools but for the larger ones that are now being made. I believe the depth is anything over 2 feet.

It is true....no one takes responsibility for their actions anymore...but all it takes is one person to sue because little timmy drowned in the pool and then the flood gates will open for more lawsuits. This is just a measure to help lower your liability if something like the above happens.


Posted by muzzybear on May-10-2006 13:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
I can see where this law is coming from too. Its yet another feel good bylaw that does nothing but inconvenience the homeowner. And not coincidentally, raises more taxes.

Inflatable pools? COME ON!! I can see this law applying to permanant pools but INFLATABLE ONES??

sheesh!

Whats next? A ban on slip and slides?


A kid can drown in a bathtub. These rules aren't a bad idea. Just get a padlock (assuming you have a fence).

We had a pool growing up and had to make our fences higher. Kids still jumped the fence to pool hop.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.