TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Draft up for debate tomorrow


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jun-05-2006 18:59:

Draft up for debate tomorrow

Tomorrow, this goes up for debate. Scared yet?

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h4752:

Well, you should be.


Posted by dcougar99 on Jun-05-2006 19:17:

Re: Draft up for debate tomorrow

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
Tomorrow, this goes up for debate. Scared yet?

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h4752:

Well, you should be.


18-42 manditory service and "for other purposes" should do it.


109th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 4752
To provide for the common defense by requiring all persons in the United States, including women, between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 14, 2006
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services


Posted by George Smiley on Jun-05-2006 21:25:

Ha!


Posted by juzfugen on Jun-05-2006 21:57:

Yes this is the SECOND time a DEMOCRAT Charles Rangle has tried to get this introduced...

It is said that this is one of his ways of protesting the war in Iraq
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0302g.asp,
joke or not I just find it amusing that its always a Democrat trying to get the draft reinstated.

for you young'ins who are nervous dont worry the only way the US will have a draft is if a conventional WW3 breaks out across several countries. The US military prefers a volunteer force over a draft anyday of the week.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jun-05-2006 23:57:

"and for other purposes."

:grin:


Posted by Ek0nomik on Jun-06-2006 01:04:

Whatev.


Posted by OurManFlint on Jun-06-2006 01:17:

If this ever happens (which I highly doubt), I'll just be glad that I have my Mexican citizenship


Posted by Q5echo on Jun-06-2006 02:05:

ok. for you bloaks that aren't aware who Charlie Rangel is, he's a among the most dispicable of Democrats in the house. he is a user of issues, not a mender of them. this is a scare tactic left over from the '04 campaign. he cares nothing about the military or force retention or range.

the man is a user. fear not.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.