TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- A Terrifying Message from Al Gore


Posted by tubularbills on Jun-28-2006 00:51:

A Terrifying Message from Al Gore



just from the still image of Al Gore & Bender - you know it's gonna be good.

+hopes that this isn't repost+


Posted by Yan on Jun-28-2006 00:53:

It wasn't too amusing (when I first saw it come up on youtube) but it does give me hope for the next lot of episodes.


Posted by Ted Promo on Jun-28-2006 00:56:

The thing that bothers me about this whole global warming issue is how the Democrats try to pin it down as it being entirely our fault. I'm not saying that our rampant pollution is in any way helping the situation but I believe scientific fact has proven that the sun is heating up on its own accord. Meaning, sure, we could throw the bottle away, but the sun's still having its period, kind of like not telling a girl you're around all the time that she's atrocious when she's having her monthly blood-letting. She's still going to bitch at you no matter what.


Posted by Sunsnail on Jun-28-2006 00:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
The thing that bothers me about this whole global warming issue is how the Democrats try to pin it down as it being entirely our fault. I'm not saying that our rampant pollution is in any way helping the situation but I believe scientific fact has proven that the sun is heating up on its own accord. Meaning, sure, we could throw the bottle away, but the sun's still having its period, kind of like not telling a girl you're around all the time that she's atrocious when she's having her monthly blood-letting. She's still going to bitch at you no matter what.


totally true. it has cycles


Posted by Ted Promo on Jun-28-2006 01:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
totally true. it has cycles


namechangehax


Posted by tubularbills on Jun-28-2006 01:05:

just for the record, i wasn't trying to stir up political debate - i just thought it was funny that al gore even said he was trying to "Scare" you about global warming.

and the fact that bender, of all characters from futurama, was the one who was on there, because it doesn't affect him at all...what with him being a robot and all.


Posted by Yan on Jun-28-2006 01:24:

quote:
Originally posted by tubularbills
and the fact that bender, of all characters from futurama, was the one who was on there, because it doesn't affect him at all...what with him being a robot and all.


But it DOES affect him.

[serious, analytical mode]Due to the necessity of consuming beer, Bender is very much at risk of being negatively affected seeing as how the barley-growth is altered by the change in temperatures around the world.

[/serious, analytical]


Posted by igottaknow on Jun-28-2006 01:52:

Republican talking point #9359:

The sun will one day supernova and destroy our solar system so we don't need to care about global warning or do anything to protect the environment.


Posted by Spirit5 on Jun-28-2006 04:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
The thing that bothers me about this whole global warming issue is how the Democrats try to pin it down as it being entirely our fault. I'm not saying that our rampant pollution is in any way helping the situation but I believe scientific fact has proven that the sun is heating up on its own accord. Meaning, sure, we could throw the bottle away, but the sun's still having its period, kind of like not telling a girl you're around all the time that she's atrocious when she's having her monthly blood-letting. She's still going to bitch at you no matter what.


True, it does have cycles and the blame isn't solely on humans, however we have accelerated the process. So obviously there is a need to conserve, develop alternative fuels to protect our environment and to limit green house gases. This is the point the Democrats, and Al Gore in particular, are trying to make. It's pretty much common knowledge that we need to do something about this. I know this isn't a political debate but the environmental issue shouldn't be a political or partisan issue, it's just become one. It's a human issue, whether you want to live in a world that has clean air and clean water, or a world filled with pollution and disease, as well as the extinction of species, melting of the polar ice caps and other effects of global warming. It's just an important issue that will determine what kind of world we will live in.


Posted by Ted Promo on Jun-28-2006 04:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
True, it does have cycles and the blame isn't solely on humans, however we have accelerated the process. So obviously there is a need to conserve, develop alternative fuels to protect our environment and to limit green house gases. This is the point the Democrats, and Al Gore in particular, are trying to make. It's pretty much common knowledge that we need to do something about this. I know this isn't a political debate but the environmental issue shouldn't be a political or partisan issue, it's just become one. It's a human issue, whether you want to live in a world that has clean air and clean water, or a world filled with pollution and disease, as well as the extinction of species, melting of the polar ice caps and other effects of global warming. It's just an important issue that will determine what kind of world we will live in.


Don't you have some 5 page thesis to be writing on the 4/4 time signature and its adherent symboisis to dance music, the vagina, and your birth rather than posting in the c0r?

Just kidding, I get their stance, I just think the general context taken by the public who dare not tread into anything that needs further analysis is that the humans are directly dooming themselves and it's all our fault for being greedy man-beasts with cool videos and the internet.


Posted by Spirit5 on Jun-28-2006 04:35:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
Don't you have some 5 page thesis to be writing on the 4/4 time signature and its adherent symboisis to dance music, the vagina, and your birth rather than posting in the c0r?

Just kidding, I get their stance, I just think the general context taken by the public who dare not tread into anything that needs further analysis is that the humans are directly dooming themselves and it's all our fault for being greedy man-beasts with cool videos and the internet.


Haha I know, i've not been posting long threads as much, instead I PM people my responses to certain issues raised in the MD forum.

Yeah I mean i'm a Democrat, but I try to have a more moderate stance on things, because I feel both parties have their strengths and weaknesses and need to come to agreement on certain issues like this issue. I feel strongly that this issue shouldn't be an issue about politics or ideology but rather a mutual respect for our Earth. To me it's no different than how you treat yourself, your family and friends, strangers, other's home and your own. I mean it's something that should unite us all. The Supreme Court is going to have a debate soon about the environment and hopefully they will come to consensus that something needs to be done to limit green house gases, esp with big companies. The Earth is the home that we all share, and we should protect it for our survival and the survival of animals. That's not extreme environmentalism (like the ELF) but common sense...


Posted by Ted Promo on Jun-28-2006 04:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
Haha I know, i've not been posting long threads as much, instead I PM people my responses to certain issues raised in the MD forum.

Yeah I mean i'm a Democrat, but I try to have a more moderate stance on things, because I feel both parties have their strengths and weaknesses and need to come to agreement on certain issues like this issue. I feel strongly that this issue shouldn't be an issue about politics or ideology but rather a mutual respect for our Earth. To me it's no different than how you treat yourself, your family and friends, strangers, other's home and your own. I mean it's something that should unite us all. The Supreme Court is going to have a debate soon about the environment and hopefully they will come to consensus that something needs to be done to limit green house gases, esp with big companies. The Earth is the home that we all share, and we should protect it for our survival and the survival of animals. That's not extreme environmentalism (like the ELF) but common sense...


Oh god elfs aresofawkinghawt. I recycle


Posted by Ang ' ela_ie on Jun-28-2006 05:02:

I support Al's effort. I think we can all agree something needs to be done, whether or not you agree with the level of distaster that is claimed in his book. Or the movie.


Posted by AndreaCKY772 on Jun-28-2006 05:55:

i won't mess with al gore because he's way too cereal about things.


Posted by Yan on Jun-28-2006 05:57:

quote:
Originally posted by AndreaCKY772
i won't mess with al gore because he's way too cereal about things.


ZOMHOG RLY?

: picks nose:


Posted by AndreaCKY772 on Jun-28-2006 06:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Yan
ZOMHOG RLY?

: picks nose:


for realz

can i get you a tissue?


Posted by Yan on Jun-28-2006 06:08:

quote:
Originally posted by AndreaCKY772
for realz

can i get you a tissue?


::uses sleeve::

Bender wants YOU... to make a funny Futuruma reference in your next post.


Posted by occrider on Jun-28-2006 06:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
The thing that bothers me about this whole global warming issue is how the Democrats try to pin it down as it being entirely our fault. I'm not saying that our rampant pollution is in any way helping the situation but I believe scientific fact has proven that the sun is heating up on its own accord. Meaning, sure, we could throw the bottle away, but the sun's still having its period, kind of like not telling a girl you're around all the time that she's atrocious when she's having her monthly blood-letting. She's still going to bitch at you no matter what.


You might want to check your facts. It's not democrats ... it's scientists ... commissioned by congress ... reported by fox news!!! Why do scientists, republican led congress, and fox news hate america??

quote:

Congressional Scientific Commission: Global Warming Is Real, Caused by Humans
Friday, June 23, 2006

The National Academy of Sciences, reaching that conclusion in a broad review of scientific work requested by Congress, reported Thursday that the "recent warmth is unprecedented for at least the last 400 years and potentially the last several millennia."

A panel of top climate scientists told lawmakers that the Earth is heating up and that "human activities are responsible for much of the recent warming."

Their 155-page report said average global surface temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere rose about 1 degree during the 20th century.

This is shown in boreholes, retreating glaciers and other evidence found in nature, said Gerald North, a geosciences professor at Texas A&M University who chaired the academy's panel.

The report was requested in November by the chairman of the House Science Committee, Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, R-N.Y., to address naysayers who question whether global warming is a major threat.

Last year, when the House Energy and Commerce Committee chairman, Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, launched an investigation of three climate scientists, Boehlert said Barton should try to learn from scientists, not intimidate them.

Boehlert said Thursday the report shows the value of having scientists advise Congress.

"There is nothing in this report that should raise any doubts about the broad scientific consensus on global climate change," he said.

Other new research Thursday showed that global warming produced about half of the extra hurricane-fueled warmth in the North Atlantic in 2005, and natural cycles were a minor factor, according to Kevin Trenberth and Dennis Shea of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a research lab sponsored by the National Science Foundation and universities.

Their study is being published by the American Geophysical Union.

The Bush administration has maintained that the threat is not severe enough to warrant new pollution controls that the White House says would have cost 5 million Americans their jobs.

Climate scientists Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes had concluded the Northern Hemisphere was the warmest it has been in 2,000 years.

Their research was known as the "hockey-stick" graphic because it compared the sharp curve of the hockey blade to the recent uptick in temperatures and the stick's long shaft to centuries of previous climate stability.

The National Academy scientists concluded that the Mann-Bradley-Hughes research from the late 1990s was "likely" to be true, said John "Mike" Wallace, an atmospheric sciences professor at the University of Washington and a panel member.

The conclusions from the '90s research "are very close to being right" and are supported by even more recent data, Wallace said.

The panel looked at how other scientists reconstructed the Earth's temperatures going back thousands of years, before there was data from modern scientific instruments.

For all but the most recent 150 years, the academy scientists relied on "proxy" evidence from tree rings, corals, glaciers and ice cores, cave deposits, ocean and lake sediments, boreholes and other sources. They also examined indirect records such as paintings of glaciers in the Alps.

Combining that information gave the panel "a high level of confidence that the last few decades of the 20th century were warmer than any comparable period in the last 400 years," the academy said.

Overall, the panel agreed that the warming in the last few decades of the 20th century was unprecedented over the last 1,000 years, though relatively warm conditions persisted around the year 1000, followed by a "Little Ice Age" from about 1500 to 1850.

The scientists said they had less confidence in the evidence of temperatures before 1600. But they considered it reliable enough to conclude there were sharp spikes in carbon dioxide and methane, the two major "greenhouse" gases blamed for trapping heat in the atmosphere, beginning in the 20th century, after remaining fairly level for 12,000 years.

Between 1 A.D. and 1850, volcanic eruptions and solar fluctuations were the main causes of changes in greenhouse gas levels. But those temperature changes "were much less pronounced than the warming due to greenhouse gas" levels by pollution since the mid-19th century, it said.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private organization chartered by Congress to advise the government of scientific matters.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200590,00.html


Posted by itsamemario on Jun-28-2006 16:34:

im serialsly gonna see that movie.. yay


Posted by StanVoid on Jun-28-2006 16:40:

is he cereal?


Posted by tubularbills on Jun-28-2006 16:43:

quote:
Originally posted by StanVoid
is he cereal?


super.....duper....seriol


Posted by StanVoid on Jun-28-2006 16:45:

quote:
Originally posted by tubularbills
super.....duper....seriol



Posted by Ojay on Jun-28-2006 18:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Demoted
The thing that bothers me about this whole global warming issue is how the Democrats try to pin it down as it being entirely our fault. I'm not saying that our rampant pollution is in any way helping the situation but I believe scientific fact has proven that the sun is heating up on its own accord. Meaning, sure, we could throw the bottle away, but the sun's still having its period, kind of like not telling a girl you're around all the time that she's atrocious when she's having her monthly blood-letting. She's still going to bitch at you no matter what.


The sun cycles. But it doesn't matter anymore. The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is already the highest for several 100000 years (some already add a trailing "0" to that number) and (because you know about the effect of CO2) it can be exopected a temp increase of around 5�C the next 100 years (and much more over the next 1000 years). 55million years ago the earth was very hot because of a very high CO2 content in the atmospere (roughly 2x the CO2 content as of now) that even the arctics were tropical. And it was extremely rainy on earth in higher latitudes. That was so much water that the arctic ocean lost its salinity so that infact algae and waterplants could cover the entire arctics. Strange, eh? It will take roughly 1000-2000 years from now on before the world will reach that point again.... probably.

What I want to say: the earth will survive - but it will look very different. And there is not necessarily a place for humans. The tropics might be extremely stormy, the sea level will be 200m higher as it is now and the artics will be rainy-rainy-rainy...


Posted by tubularbills on Jun-28-2006 21:58:

quote:
Originally posted by StanVoid


LOL, class!


Posted by CleverName on Jun-28-2006 22:27:

quote:
Originally posted by igottaknow
Republican talking point #9359:

The sun will one day supernova and destroy our solar system so we don't need to care about global warning or do anything to protect the environment.



Silly unbeliever, the rapture will occur far in advance of any global warming weather rapage!



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.