TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- THE DOCKS please support us in our fight to stay open
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by techead on Jul-25-2006 19:25:

THE DOCKS please support us in our fight to stay open

As you all now know The Docks is in danger of being closed down, we need your support

please open the following link

www.thedocks.com and click on SUPPORT US.

We need letters of support stating why they support The Docks and/or why we still should still be able to operate. We provide this city with an amazing outlet for all tourists, residents, local businesses and as well for our own staff and partners. Please speak up, we will need all the letters we can get. Even short letters are fine, they do not need to be long.


Posted by girllovingtvibe on Jul-25-2006 19:27:

writing a letter now!


Posted by The Highroller on Jul-25-2006 19:32:

Consider it done. Everyone should write a letter, Docks patron or not. The AGCO is coming for your favourite club next.


Posted by King Luis on Jul-25-2006 19:32:

quote:
Originally posted by girllovingtvibe
writing a letter now!

+1


Posted by TO guy on Jul-25-2006 19:35:

quote:
Originally posted by girllovingtvibe
writing a letter now!


I'll fire one off tonight.


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-25-2006 19:37:

Re: THE DOCKS please support us in our fight to stay open

quote:
Originally posted by techead
As you all now know The Docks is in danger of being closed down, we need your support

please open the following link

www.thedocks.com and click on SUPPORT US.

We need letters of support stating why they support The Docks and/or why we still should still be able to operate. We provide this city with an amazing outlet for all tourists, residents, local businesses and as well for our own staff and partners. Please speak up, we will need all the letters we can get. Even short letters are fine, they do not need to be long.


i take it you will be coming to the rally? spread the word to all your coworkers


Posted by DigDeep on Jul-25-2006 19:38:

To Whom It May Concern:

I am a promoter for another club in the city, and at times The Docks is direct competition with our club, however I am completely against the recent development in regards to its license being revoked. The Docks serves as a fantastic entertainment complex, as well as a diverse nightclub and venue for people of Toronto, and visitors alike. To close this venue would be taking a rather large step backwards in the re-building of tourism, and also would be a blow to the general economy. I know many of the people who depend on The Docks as their ONLY means of income, and to leave them jobless to keep the islanders precious property quiet is hardly a fair tradeoff. To please the several hundred people on the island, and to upset the thousands who frequent this venue on a yearly basis is simply not fair. The people who choose to live on this island should be treated like the rest of Torontonians who have to deal with the city sounds on a daily basis. Noise is a part of life for Toronto, and if you don�t like it � there are plenty of other options like up north, or even closer � the lakeshore of Mississauga. Do people who live close to the airport have a choice as to when flights come and go? No, and they shouldn�t. Just like these people on the island shouldn�t have a choice either.

Signed, a very ashamed Toronto resident,

Jeff Button


Posted by oldschool420 on Jul-25-2006 19:39:

Done.


Posted by MKpacha on Jul-25-2006 19:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorwhore

I am a promoter for another club in the city, and at times The Docks is direct competition with our club, however I am completely against the recent development in regards to its license being revoked.



really like how you put this in jeff. it shows that despite certain competition, we as a community support eachother in times like this.


i'll write a letter also


Posted by loca on Jul-25-2006 20:00:

sent


Posted by bcope on Jul-25-2006 20:03:

dont forget to add [email protected] to your emails


Posted by DigDeep on Jul-25-2006 20:05:

quote:
Originally posted by DigDeep
To Whom It May Concern:

I am a promoter for another club in the city, and at times The Docks is direct competition with our club, however I am completely against the recent development in regards to its license being revoked. The Docks serves as a fantastic entertainment complex, as well as a diverse nightclub and venue for people of Toronto, and visitors alike. To close this venue would be taking a rather large step backwards in the re-building of tourism, and also would be a blow to the general economy. I know many of the people who depend on The Docks as their ONLY means of income, and to leave them jobless to keep the islanders precious property quiet is hardly a fair tradeoff. To please the several hundred people on the island, and to upset the thousands who frequent this venue on a yearly basis is simply not fair. The people who choose to live on this island should be treated like the rest of Torontonians who have to deal with the city sounds on a daily basis. Noise is a part of life for Toronto, and if you don?t like it ? there are plenty of other options like up north, or even closer ? the lakeshore of Mississauga. Do people who live close to the airport have a choice as to when flights come and go? No, and they shouldn?t. Just like these people on the island shouldn?t have a choice either.

Signed, a very ashamed Toronto resident,

Jeff Button


Thank you for your e-mail. It has been received in the Office of Mayor Miller.

In response to your comments, the decision to revoke the Docks? liquor license was made by the provincial Alcohol and Gaming Commission and NOT by the city.




The Commission?s decision was theirs alone based on the evidence before them. The decision does not mean the club will have to close and the owners may appeal the Commission?s decision to the courts.



The mayor believes that the city has an obligation to enforce noise bylaws no matter where the offence takes place. It doesn?t matter if it?s a nightclub downtown or a neighbourhood bar in Scarborough or a corner pub in East York. Noise is one of the most frequent complaints made to the city. Businesses have to follow the rules of their license.



The city worked for a very long time with the owners of the Docks to find appropriate remedies but they were either unwilling or unable to meet their obligations.



Again, thank you for your e-mail.



Karen Duffy
Office of Mayor Miller


Posted by girllovingtvibe on Jul-25-2006 20:09:

I have recieved a response

"Thank you for your e-mail. It has been received in the Office of Mayor Miller.

In response to your comments, the decision to revoke the Docks� liquor license was made by the provincial Alcohol and Gaming Commission and NOT by the city.

The Commission�s decision was theirs alone based on the evidence before them. The decision does not mean the club will have to close and the owners may appeal the Commission�s decision to the courts.

The mayor believes that the city has an obligation to enforce noise bylaws no matter where the offence takes place. It doesn�t matter if it�s a nightclub downtown or a neighbourhood bar in Scarborough or a corner pub in East York. Noise is one of the most frequent complaints made to the city. Businesses have to follow the rules of their license.

The city worked for a very long time with the owners of the Docks to find appropriate remedies but they were either unwilling or unable to meet their obligations.

Again, thank you for your e-mail.

Karen Duffy
Office of Mayor Miller"


Posted by DigDeep on Jul-25-2006 20:10:

quote:
Originally posted by DigDeep
Thank you for your e-mail. It has been received in the Office of Mayor Miller.

In response to your comments, the decision to revoke the Docks? liquor license was made by the provincial Alcohol and Gaming Commission and NOT by the city.

The Commission?s decision was theirs alone based on the evidence before them. The decision does not mean the club will have to close and the owners may appeal the Commission?s decision to the courts.

The mayor believes that the city has an obligation to enforce noise bylaws no matter where the offence takes place. It doesn?t matter if it?s a nightclub downtown or a neighbourhood bar in Scarborough or a corner pub in East York. Noise is one of the most frequent complaints made to the city. Businesses have to follow the rules of their license.

The city worked for a very long time with the owners of the Docks to find appropriate remedies but they were either unwilling or unable to meet their obligations.

Again, thank you for your e-mail.

Karen Duffy
Office of Mayor Miller


quote:
Originally posted by girllovingtvibe
"Thank you for your e-mail. It has been received in the Office of Mayor Miller.

In response to your comments, the decision to revoke the Docks? liquor license was made by the provincial Alcohol and Gaming Commission and NOT by the city.

The Commission?s decision was theirs alone based on the evidence before them. The decision does not mean the club will have to close and the owners may appeal the Commission?s decision to the courts.

The mayor believes that the city has an obligation to enforce noise bylaws no matter where the offence takes place. It doesn?t matter if it?s a nightclub downtown or a neighbourhood bar in Scarborough or a corner pub in East York. Noise is one of the most frequent complaints made to the city. Businesses have to follow the rules of their license.

The city worked for a very long time with the owners of the Docks to find appropriate remedies but they were either unwilling or unable to meet their obligations.

Again, thank you for your e-mail.

Karen Duffy
Office of Mayor Miller"


they must be getting a lot of emails.... automated reply


Posted by MKpacha on Jul-25-2006 20:11:

copy. paste.






redic.


Posted by TO guy on Jul-25-2006 20:14:

quote:
Originally posted by MKpacha
copy. paste.






redic.


gotta love the canned response.

You should send a letter regarding something else, and see if you get the same reply for that one as well.


Posted by girllovingtvibe on Jul-25-2006 20:16:

Basically i sent a response back - paraphrased:

This is all well and good but what about events such as Pride, Caribana, Outdoor Concerts, Street Festivals etc. that violate noise bylaws? Just Curious? I feel that there has been a huge effort on pushing clubs, bars and restuarants out of business which will eventually hurt our community.


Posted by Skipper on Jul-25-2006 20:18:

Could someone post what the actual verbage in the noise bylaw is?


Posted by RapidFire on Jul-25-2006 20:18:

docks > guv

I shall do it.


Posted by drgoodvibe on Jul-25-2006 20:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
Could someone post what the actual verbage in the noise bylaw is?



http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/bylaws/2003/law0111.pdf


Posted by TO guy on Jul-25-2006 20:22:

quote:
Originally posted by Skipper
Could someone post what the actual verbage in the noise bylaw is?


I haven't been able to find it, and quicklaw hasn't posted the decision yet either

I'll look around for the bylaw some more.


Posted by TO guy on Jul-25-2006 20:23:

quote:
Originally posted by drgoodvibe
http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/bylaws/2003/law0111.pdf


sweet! That settles that hunt.

And to respond to the Caribana etc post: they can get a license to violate the by-law.


Posted by drgoodvibe on Jul-25-2006 20:27:

quote:
Originally posted by TO guy
sweet! That settles that hunt.

And to respond to the Caribana etc post: they can get a license to violate the by-law.


also isn't Caribana over by 11pm ?


Posted by TO guy on Jul-25-2006 20:28:

quote:
Originally posted by drgoodvibe
also isn't Caribana over by 11pm ?


I've never been ... probably the official thing, but there's got to be a party somewhere that keeps going.


Posted by loca on Jul-25-2006 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Floorwhore
they must be getting a lot of emails.... automated reply


Yup, ctrl+c ctrl+v for me too. Wankers.


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.