TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- TORONTO STAR: Fed up with lakefront noise? Just deal with it
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by dEsidEL on Jul-29-2006 08:59:

Read This! TORONTO STAR: Fed up with lakefront noise? Just deal with it


Rolling noise across the waves from party boats and harbourfront night spots often annoys waterfront-area residents on both the city side and the islands.

quote:


Fed up with lakefront noise? Just deal with it
`Part of living' near water, say residents

City sent warning memo in the spring

Jul. 29, 2006. 04:10 AM
DONOVAN VINCENT
CITY HALL BUREAU

Exasperated by helicopters and planes flying overhead, horns from ferries, noise from the Gardiner and Lake Shore Blvd. or music from nightclubs or festivals?

Tough.

That's the reality of living on Toronto's waterfront, so get used to it.

Queen's Quay W. condo resident Harry Oldenhof looks at it that way. He has lived in his condo for nearly four years and has heard some of his neighbours complaining about noise but doesn't share their concerns.

"If you move here, that's what you have to expect,'' Oldenhof, 61, said as he walked his Dalmatian at Harbourfront one afternoon this week.

"There is noise here, but it's reasonable and it stops at a reasonable time,'' Oldenhof adds.

A number of residents have lodged complaints about the noise coming from Harbourfront Centre's concert stage, which offers everything from jazz to blues and classical music.

The issue of noise on the waterfront was back in the news this week with the Docks nightclub having its liquor licence revoked after years of noise complaints from Toronto Island residents. That decision is under appeal and the club remains in business serving liquor.

Cinematographer Carmen Dodaro, 53, who lives year-round on his sailboat, which he docks at Pier 4 marina, directly beside the Harbourfront stage, loves the entertainment and blames people with "nothing better to do'' for going to police to complain about noise from the music.

"I don't know what the problem is. It's the best entertainment in the city,'' he says.

Helicopters and planes flying in and around the island airport, traffic from the Gardiner Expressway, horns from ferries heading to and from the Islands, and other watercraft like powerboats and tour boats, are all sources of noise, says sports announcer Dana McKiel, who lives in an apartment near the waterfront.

But he too accepts it all.

"It's part of living at the waterfront,'' says McKiel, who is mulling over the idea of buying a condo on Queen's Quay.

The biggest sources of noise complaints in the area have been the Docks, the Guvernment Night Club, and tour boats or party boats in the inner harbour, says Stephen Miller, a supervisor with the city's municipal licensing and standards office, who deals with noise complaints along the waterfront.

The tour and party boat operators, which have generated ongoing complaints for a number of years from islanders and condo dwellers, were issued warnings from Miller's department in the spring.

The notification outlined the city's noise by-law � no loud music is permitted between 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. Monday to Saturday, or 11 p.m. to 9 a.m. on Sundays and statutory holidays, and even when it is permitted it can never be of a volume or nature that disturbs inhabitants.

As for the other noise hot spots on the waterfront, Miller offered these explanations:

#
Helicopters and planes flying in and around the island airport: That's not city jurisdiction, it's federal.

#
Traffic along the Gardiner: That's a fact of life that can't be controlled. It's impractical to put up noise barriers similar to those on the 401, largely because the Gardiner is a raised roadway. Noise from the Gardiner is actually considered part of background noise level for the area.

#
Ferry or boat horns: that's regulated as a safety standard, the same as sounding a train whistle at a railway crossing, or siren for an emergency vehicle. Horns have to be sounded when craft are departing or docking.

When it comes to investigating noise complaints, there are three main categories under the city's bylaws. The general noise prohibition relates to noise "likely to disturb an inhabitant.''

Specific noise prohibitions relate to sources like the racing of vehicles, squealing tires, or cars without mufflers.

The city uses noise meters only to measure sound from air conditioners.

For noise in general � say loud music during permitted times � a quantitative measurement is not necessarily going to reflect the annoyance factor to the people that are disturbed, Miller says.

"In other words, it (the bylaw) doesn't say that 60 decibels is acceptable and 75 is not. It's not a quantitative type of noise measured in those terms, because you could be right next to it and it could be impacting on your everyday activities by virtue of the fact that it's constant ...'' Miller says.

"That's very subjective. It's inhabitants describing their lifestyle being interrupted,'' he says.

Fines for noise violations can be as high as $5,000 per violation.


source:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Co...id=968332188492


Posted by Jer on Jul-29-2006 11:27:

And then there's some who just *don't* understand urban living.


Posted by rabbitjoker on Jul-29-2006 14:40:

Notice they mentioned The Guvernment as the #2 source of noise complaints?

If The Docks is shut down - expect The Guvernment to be next on the islander's attack list.


Posted by fairy godfather on Jul-29-2006 14:43:

I am taking up a collection to run a "ONE WAY" bus service to the country...

Anyone want to contribute?


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-29-2006 14:47:

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Notice they mentioned The Guvernment as the #2 source of noise complaints?

If The Docks is shut down - expect The Guvernment to be next on the islander's attack list.


exactly...

whiners never stop whining..

and thats been my point all along. You let them win, they will move on to the next item on their list. Whether its noise, smoking, dogs, or whatever.


Posted by geroin on Jul-29-2006 15:25:

those were probably the people that called the cops when lawler was at the skybar


Posted by HypnotEyez on Jul-29-2006 15:33:

in the legal forms when people are moving into the residence downtown/harbourfront it should clearly state that noise here is elevated - move in at own risk and do not fuckin complain!!... seriously


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-29-2006 15:36:

quote:
Originally posted by HypnotEyez
in the legal forms when people are moving into the residence downtown/harbourfront it should clearly state that noise here is elevated - move in at own risk and do not fuckin complain!!... seriously


whats sad is that common sense like that would even need to be put in writing.


Posted by FunkyCrew on Jul-29-2006 15:43:

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker
Notice they mentioned The Guvernment as the #2 source of noise complaints?

If The Docks is shut down - expect The Guvernment to be next on the islander's attack list.



Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-29-2006 15:44:

quote:
Originally posted by FunkyGroove


u are one of the biggest advocator of banning things on this board...

this is just that sort of mentality carried forward except that this time you are on the other end of it.


Posted by FunkyCrew on Jul-29-2006 15:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
u are one of the biggest advocator of banning things on this board...

this is just that sort of mentality carried forward except that this time you are on the other end of it.



hey I never joined the argument against the noise

if you remember I always said you can't equate very different things together


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-29-2006 15:52:

quote:
Originally posted by FunkyGroove
hey I never joined the argument against the noise

if you remember I always said you can't equate very different things together


aaah but you can...

you cant just pick and choose your causes. If you support the ban-it mentality for other things you shouldnt be surprised when somebody uses the same logic against something you enjoy, in this case noise.


Posted by FunkyCrew on Jul-29-2006 15:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
aaah but you can...

you cant just pick and choose your causes. If you support the ban-it mentality for other things you shouldnt be surprised when somebody uses the same logic against something you enjoy, in this case noise.


i don't know, i don't support "ban it all" policy

plus none of us are perfect, we want some things to go, and some to say, so you can use this against 99% of the people

right now i'm in the country where rules are written to NOT be followed, so maybe we should ship some of the Canadian officials here, would do the island some good


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-29-2006 15:58:

you probably could apply that to 99% of people. But that doesnt make it right.

I am on record when it comes to supporting rights of others that i dont partake in.

I have never owned a pitbull

I dont smoke

I dont eat sushi

But im still 100% in favour of those people's rights. Because when it comes to an issue like this, i would want those people to support MY cause as well. You cant just pick and choose laws of convenience. You are either for a sterile society or you arent.

And id hope that canadian officials dont show up whereever u are. I dont think they would be ready for a mountain of pathetic bylaws that stipulate everything from no ball playing to no drinks after 2 am. I dont think they are ready for the permissiveness displayed by canadian officials when it comes to homelessness and "hug a thug" approaches on REAL crime either.


Posted by FunkyCrew on Jul-29-2006 16:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
you probably could apply that to 99% of people. But that doesnt make it right.

I am on record when it comes to supporting rights of others that i dont partake in.

I have never owned a pitbull

I dont smoke

I dont eat sushi

But im still 100% in favour of those people's rights. Because when it comes to an issue like this, i would want those people to support MY cause as well. You cant just pick and choose laws of convenience. You are either for a sterile society or you arent.


see you doing it again! what does liking sushi has to do with Club's noise levels?

sure, peole should respect other people's rights and etc

the same way I have a right to pick and choose a lot of things


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-29-2006 16:03:

quote:
Originally posted by FunkyGroove
see you doing it again! what does liking sushi has to do with Club's noise levels?

sure, peole should respect other people's rights and etc

the same way I have a right to pick and choose a lot of things


they tried to ban raw sushi a few years ago...

the same ban-it-for-the-greater-good mentality behind the current noise situation.

People tend to think that society's attitudes are individually based on specific events. What i am saying is that they are not. If you apply a precedent to ban smokin for example, the anti drinking, noise, and anything else u can think of people will use the same arguements to further their cause. As you are seeing now.


Posted by TSI_AWD on Jul-29-2006 18:55:

Man, the problem with Toronto is it's becoming condo city....in the city...which isn't what an urban environment is all about. The southern part of the city should all be commercial buildings, instead of a berlin-wall of condos on queen's quay, I think that's one of the problems. The ratio of commericial to residential buildings in Toronto is going over the top (I mean in the city), these same assholes who are complaining about the sounds of a thriving urban environment should go live in the god damn suburbs. That's what suburbs are for. I don't understand what they want? To create a boring environment so that everyone will shit on the city and say it sucks?
This Canadian mentality of consevatism has just gone over the top, and this is just one of the ways.
No alcohol after 2am, retarded laws to stop big parties from happening, police serving as nothing but traffic control....


Posted by london_ta on Jul-29-2006 19:22:

quote:
Originally posted by TSI_AWD
Man, the problem with Toronto is it's becoming condo city....in the city...which isn't what an urban environment is all about. The southern part of the city should all be commercial buildings, instead of a berlin-wall of condos on queen's quay, I think that's one of the problems. The ratio of commericial to residential buildings in Toronto is going over the top (I mean in the city), these same assholes who are complaining about the sounds of a thriving urban environment should go live in the god damn suburbs. That's what suburbs are for. I don't understand what they want? To create a boring environment so that everyone will shit on the city and say it sucks?
This Canadian mentality of consevatism has just gone over the top, and this is just one of the ways.
No alcohol after 2am, retarded laws to stop big parties from happening, police serving as nothing but traffic control....


I couldn't say better myself.


Posted by geroin on Jul-29-2006 19:23:

quote:
Originally posted by TSI_AWD
Man, the problem with Toronto is it's becoming condo city....in the city...which isn't what an urban environment is all about. The southern part of the city should all be commercial buildings, instead of a berlin-wall of condos on queen's quay, I think that's one of the problems. The ratio of commericial to residential buildings in Toronto is going over the top (I mean in the city), these same assholes who are complaining about the sounds of a thriving urban environment should go live in the god damn suburbs. That's what suburbs are for. I don't understand what they want? To create a boring environment so that everyone will shit on the city and say it sucks?
This Canadian mentality of consevatism has just gone over the top, and this is just one of the ways.
No alcohol after 2am, retarded laws to stop big parties from happening, police serving as nothing but traffic control....


absolutely agree


Posted by fairy godfather on Jul-29-2006 20:37:

quote:
Originally posted by TSI_AWD
Man, the problem with Toronto is it's becoming condo city....in the city...which isn't what an urban environment is all about. The southern part of the city should all be commercial buildings, instead of a berlin-wall of condos on queen's quay, I think that's one of the problems. The ratio of commericial to residential buildings in Toronto is going over the top (I mean in the city), these same assholes who are complaining about the sounds of a thriving urban environment should go live in the god damn suburbs. That's what suburbs are for. I don't understand what they want? To create a boring environment so that everyone will shit on the city and say it sucks?
This Canadian mentality of consevatism has just gone over the top, and this is just one of the ways.
No alcohol after 2am, retarded laws to stop big parties from happening, police serving as nothing but traffic control....


The only problem with your argument...it that most of what you are complaining about is being pushed and supported by the left wing of Toronto Council...not the right!


Posted by cyper on Jul-29-2006 20:54:

If you dont like big city noise.. move to the fucking country!!

And if you think Toronto is bad, go to one of the big cities in Europe(like Paris or London).


Seems to me that the only people complaining are just a bunch of old bitches who are cranky because they havent gotten f#cked in 20 years & their pussies dried up.


Posted by m2j on Jul-30-2006 08:25:

u know whats retarded?

Whenever I step out of Docks or Guvernment, and I walk maybe 10-20 meters to my car, I don't hear shit... how the hell do the islanders and surrounding residence pick up anything?

what are they doing, stepping OUT of their house on the poarch/balcony at 5am, cupping their ears scanning for "annoying" sounds?


But seriously, they should stfu, especially when the city warns them about noise levels before they buy the property.


Posted by fairy godfather on Jul-30-2006 16:20:

quote:
Originally posted by m2j
u know whats retarded?

Whenever I step out of Docks or Guvernment, and I walk maybe 10-20 meters to my car, I don't hear shit... how the hell do the islanders and surrounding residence pick up anything?

what are they doing, stepping OUT of their house on the poarch/balcony at 5am, cupping their ears scanning for "annoying" sounds?


But seriously, they should stfu, especially when the city warns them about noise levels before they buy the property.



+1

great point!


Posted by MarkT on Jul-30-2006 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Jayx1
aaah but you can...

you cant just pick and choose your causes. If you support the ban-it mentality for other things you shouldnt be surprised when somebody uses the same logic against something you enjoy, in this case noise.


that's absurd.

you can pick and choose, so long as you use consistent criteria.

I use something along the lines of the 'harm principle'...smoking in confined, public spaces is a specific harm to others. A *bit* of noise on the waterfront to a select few homeowners who should know better since they live near downtown...I don't consider that to be "harm". People don't have the right to SILENCE...they have the right to not be subjected to unreasonable noise...I highly doubt this noise is *that* loud.


Posted by Jayx1 on Jul-30-2006 20:13:

quote:
Originally posted by MarkT
that's absurd.

you can pick and choose, so long as you use consistent criteria.

I use something along the lines of the 'harm principle'...smoking in confined, public spaces is a specific harm to others. A *bit* of noise on the waterfront to a select few homeowners who should know better since they live near downtown...I don't consider that to be "harm". People don't have the right to SILENCE...they have the right to not be subjected to unreasonable noise...I highly doubt this noise is *that* loud.


just playing the devils advocate for a second. A lot of scientists now consider "noise pollution" to be very harmful. Of course this all falls into interpretation and relevancy. Whereas you may feel that a "little bit" of noise is not harmful to you in relation to smoking, others may feel that a little second hand smoke is not harmful to them in relation to car fumes on a city street.

Thats the problem when you become a nit picker. Its all in interpretation.

I happen to have a high (for our society at least) tolerance for the actions of others. Other people do not.


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.