TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Australia
-- If pkc did a PhD
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Trance Nutter on Aug-28-2006 05:35:

If pkc did a PhD

If pkc did a PhD, I'm betting it'd be something like this


quote:
Star Trek's a thesis
By Adam Morton
August 28, 2006

It's the PhD thesis that boldly goes where no thesis has gone before. Djoymi Baker watched 700 episodes - 624 hours without ads - of Star Trek and its spin-offs, dating from 1966 to 2005, in the name of research.

She analysed the series armed with an exhaustive knowledge of the characters and storylines of ancient mythology - from Homer's Odyssey down.

It may sound like torture for those with an aversion to William Shatner's campy theatrics but, six years and 90,000 words on, it has earned Dr Baker a coveted chancellor's prize for excellence at Melbourne University. And the respect of academics and Trekkies alike.

"I was interested in where myths turn up in less obvious forms, and there wasn't much work on the early years of television and its relation to myth," Dr Baker said.

Importantly, she was also a fan of the series.

"I don't think just because a study is serious and that I'm connecting Star Trek to a broader history of TV and ancient myths that it means there is not also a fun side - I can see the fun side as well."

Among the dark corners where Dr Baker's thesis - titled Broadcast Space: TV Culture, Myth and Star Trek - shines light is the changing link between the starship Enterprise's intergalactic adventures and the real world's space race.

Shatner's monologues were inspired by the visionary speeches of JFK, advocating greater exploration. Thirty years on, the roles were reversed, with astronauts from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration guest-starring on Star Trek spin-offs to promote their underfunded existence.

Since finishing her thesis last year, the 34-year-old has had a daughter and is turning her thesis into an academic text.

She's also writing an introductory piece for a Star Trek exhibition at the Victorian College of the Arts in October.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2...6617211732.html


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Aug-28-2006 05:41:


its fucking amazing what can be intellectualised!

for the record, i dont like star trek peeps. babylon 5 ftw!

also for the record, my hons thesis was on feminism, so if any of you gals need help exploring yourself, lemme know

if i ever did a PhD, i reckon itd be something like

\'feminist practice and its condemnation of sexual experimentation: (or) how to get your bitch to brown town\'.


Posted by eRRaTiK on Aug-28-2006 05:52:

they should make a documentary out of her thesis!

would be an interesting read i reckon.


Posted by Philby on Aug-28-2006 05:57:

haha nice one
go nerds


Posted by tathi on Aug-28-2006 06:08:

doesn't matter how fugly she could be, she would pickup hardcore at a LAN


Posted by Trance Nutter on Nov-08-2006 11:34:

Another strange PhD project, "Why cookies crumble"


quote:

LONDON, England -- When cookie-lovers open packages of their favorite snacks, some of the biscuits are often in bits.

Now scientists say they know why -- and it has little to do with the way cookies are packaged and transported.

Instead, laser tests carried out by British physicists found that cookies -- or biscuits, as they are known in Britain -- often develop "fault lines" a few hours after baking.

According to researchers at the University of Loughborough in Leicestershire, central England, as biscuits cool down after coming out of the oven, they pick up moisture around the rim which causes them to expand.

At the same time, moisture at the center makes them contract. The difference results in a build-up of strain forces that can pull a cookie apart.

Cracks appear that weaken cookies so they easily break apart when handled, moved or packaged.

Manufacturers try to tackle the problem by removing problem cookies before they reach store shelves. But many crumbly cookies still end up in shoppers' hands.

"We now have a greater understanding of why biscuits develop cracks shortly after being baked," said doctoral student Qasim Saleem, who led the research.

"This will help biscuit manufacturers adjust the humidity or temperature of their factory production lines to change the cooling process in such a way that the biscuits won't break up due to normal handling, and hence producing the perfect biscuit."

The scientists used an optical technique called "digital speckle pattern interferometry" to study the surface of cookies cooling to room temperature.

A paper on the research, entitled "A novel application of speckle interferometry for the measurement of strain distributions in semi-sweet biscuits," appeared Thursday in the journal Measurement, Science and Technology.


At least this one has some science behind it, just a strange choice of model


http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europ...mble/index.html


Posted by Philby on Nov-08-2006 12:07:

haha love it


Posted by MiSSyM on Nov-08-2006 12:35:

LOL

where did u find that? IN WHAT IN THE WEIRD IN MX?

WTF

quote:
When cookie-lovers open packages of their favorite snacks, some of the biscuits are often in bits.

WHO REALLY GIVES A FARK?

WHY DONT these 'scientists' use their knowledge on finding out something more important then why 'biscuits are often in bits'.

hahaha

for all you know some person at the shops couldve dropped a packet or thrown it in the trolley with full force, thus making the bikkie's crumble.

hahahaha


Posted by kittn on Nov-08-2006 23:23:

Yeah unless the cure for cancer is un-crumbled cookies, I think their time could be better spent!


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-08-2006 23:33:

lol at you people. as if any of us are any better. posting on ta certainly aint curing cancer and you people deem it fit to judge their studies of choice? ok.

quote:

WHY DONT these 'scientists' use their knowledge on finding out something more important then why 'biscuits are often in bits'.


when you actually use your knowledge for something that will benefit humankind, then you may pass judgement on lesser contributors.


Posted by kittn on Nov-08-2006 23:42:

But I don't get wads of government funding to post on TA.

You on the other hand... you're a public servant, aren't you?


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-08-2006 23:48:

quote:
Originally posted by kittn
But I don't get wads of government funding to post on TA.

You on the other hand... you're a public servant, aren't you?


youre kidding right? and where exactly do you think your salary comes from?

and anyway, allocations to university studies are not a tied grant, so the universities can spend that money how they wish.


Posted by vman83 on Nov-09-2006 02:33:

pkc u fuckin rule dude BABYLON 5 FOR THE WIN BIATCHES

i must admit im a fukin uber neerd, il watch bab 5, trek, worz, firefly... all that shit for days on end and still be on a hard on


Posted by MiSSyM on Nov-09-2006 02:47:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol at you people. as if any of us are any better. posting on ta certainly aint curing cancer and you people deem it fit to judge their studies of choice? ok.

No shit sherlock....however we aint SCIENTISTS.....Im sure if I was one, i wouldnt be wasting time & effort & money on researching as to why 'biscuits are often in bits'.....hahaha


quote:
when you actually use your knowledge for something that will benefit humankind, then you may pass judgement on lesser contributors.

We are allowed to pass judgement on whatever the heck we want to.
And who are you to assume that we wont end up using our knowledge for something that will benefit humankind!



Posted by vman83 on Nov-09-2006 02:57:

hey MissyM... im a scientist

im currently working on the bird flu and other various exotic animal diseases..

but yes i often ask myself why my bikies are in lil pieces... im also thinkin of applying for a grant to research why a rather decent portion of Hellraiser groupies have their two front teeth either missing or severly busted in half




Posted by MiSSyM on Nov-09-2006 03:00:

then you have to ask yourself why is your brain in pieces?

lol

joke.


Posted by Paulie on Nov-09-2006 03:03:

quote:
Originally posted by vman83
pkc u fuckin rule dude BABYLON 5 FOR THE WIN BIATCHES

i must admit im a fukin uber neerd, il watch bab 5, trek, worz, firefly... all that shit for days on end and still be on a hard on



Dude i am speechless for the first time in a long time.

Just fing LOL.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-09-2006 03:07:

quote:
Originally posted by vman83
pkc u fuckin rule dude BABYLON 5 FOR THE WIN BIATCHES

i must admit im a fukin uber neerd, il watch bab 5, trek, worz, firefly... all that shit for days on end and still be on a hard on


how the fuck did you know im a HUGE B5 fan?? yeah, definitely the BEST tv show ever ever made.

quote:
Originally posted by MISSYM
And who are you to assume that we wont end up using our knowledge for something that will benefit humankind


oh, im just taking a stab in the dark


Posted by MiSSyM on Nov-09-2006 03:20:

lol taking a stab? hahahaha

well think what ya like.


Posted by Philby on Nov-09-2006 14:26:

missy m sometimes it may not be clear to the average joe (or average freak in your case ) but something like this may have analogues to bigger picture research ie faults/tectonic plates/earthquakes/ which may interest a lot of people along the east coast of the united states for example... *puts nerd hat on*

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
how the fuck did you know im a HUGE B5 fan?? yeah, definitely the BEST tv show ever ever made.


quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
for the record, i dont like star trek peeps. babylon 5 ftw!


guess which thread the second quote is from....


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-09-2006 22:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
guess which thread the second quote is from....


i stand retarded


Posted by Heidi_Fleiss on Nov-09-2006 23:36:

quote:
missy m sometimes it may not be clear to the average joe (or average freak in your case )


Oh..

So in other words, our friend over here is the 'esoteric' one?

lol spare us...PLEASE!


Posted by Philby on Nov-10-2006 01:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Heidi_Fleiss
Oh..

So in other words, our friend over here is the 'esoteric' one?

lol spare us...PLEASE!




you wouldn't understand either


Posted by MiSSyM on Nov-10-2006 07:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Philby
missy m sometimes it may not be clear to the average joe (or average freak in your case ) but something like this may have analogues to bigger picture research ie faults/tectonic plates/earthquakes/ which may interest a lot of people along the east coast of the united states for example... *puts nerd hat on*



HAHAHAHA


blah blah blah

well why didnt it state that?

how can you know for sure?

wheres the evidence?


why doesnt it emphasise that then?
MR smartypants.



Posted by Philby on Nov-13-2006 01:39:

quote:
Originally posted by MiSSyM
HAHAHAHA


blah blah blah

well why didnt it state that?

how can you know for sure?

wheres the evidence?


why doesnt it emphasise that then?
MR smartypants.




i don't know, i'm just trying to sound smart and important


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.