Durn librul media strikes again! - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Durn librul media strikes again!

Posted by MisterOpus1 on Sep-26-2006 02:30:

Durn librul media strikes again!

When will the madness ever stop?!?!?!?!

Because we wouldn't want Newsweek hating Bush and America either.....

Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-26-2006 02:33:

I don't know about the Americans but I know the Canadians are kicking ass there.

Posted by DJ Shibby on Sep-26-2006 03:03:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
I don't know about the Americans but I know the Canadians are kicking ass there.

wow...... you're insane. Legally insane even.

I'm sure you can get tax debits from that.

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Sep-26-2006 03:07:

fucking hell

im sure there are similar instances over here in Oz, but ive never seen anything that blatantly disgraceful.

as for troops overseas, NOBODY beats the australian SAS

Posted by Groundhog Boy on Sep-26-2006 03:08:

Jesus fucking Christ. I had to go to Newsweek's site just because I could believe it, but couldn't at the same time. This country's fucking sad. Did they really think that this would slip quietly by?

Posted by josh4 on Sep-26-2006 03:19:

quote:
Originally posted by Groundhog Boy
Jesus fucking Christ. I had to go to Newsweek's site just because I could believe it, but couldn't at the same time. This country's fucking sad. Did they really think that this would slip quietly by?

Why wouldn't it slip quietly by? There aren't going to be any protests. Nothings going to happen because of it. Maybe some cable or morning show somewhere might do a short 20 second segment on it and possibly bring in some 'expert' to debate the issue.

And thats it. They'll do the same thing next issue.

Posted by Marc Summers on Sep-26-2006 03:20:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
fucking hell

im sure there are similar instances over here in Oz, but ive never seen anything that blatantly disgraceful.

as for troops overseas, NOBODY beats the australian SAS

Too bad they weren't around during the Battle of Gallipoli.

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Sep-26-2006 03:24:

quote:
Originally posted by Temperate
Too bad they weren't around during the Battle of Gallipoli.

haha, im impressed any american has even heard of that

Posted by stevieboy32808 on Sep-26-2006 03:54:

What an extreme example of the corporate media.

Posted by Q5echo on Sep-26-2006 04:03:

alright ladies, what the hell are yall trying to say about Newsweek?

...that it's some right-wing, neocon, pro-war Republican mouthpiece?

if you are, you've completely lost it.

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Sep-26-2006 04:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
alright ladies, what the hell are yall trying to say about Newsweek?

...that it's some right-wing, neocon, pro-war Republican mouthpiece?

if you are, you've completely lost it.

no, just that this kind of "censorship" is bullshit.

Posted by Q5echo on Sep-26-2006 04:08:

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
no, just that this kind of "censorship" is bullshit.

OMG dude! it's not censorship. it's marketing

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Sep-26-2006 04:09:

thats why i used the inverted commas

Posted by Fir3start3r on Sep-26-2006 04:15:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
wow...... you're insane. Legally insane even.

I'm sure you can get tax debits from that.

Sorry if I don't believe an American trying to tell me how us Canadians are doing...

...btw winter is coming, our gas is starting to feeze and I just broke out the sled dogs...

Posted by Groundhog Boy on Sep-26-2006 05:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
OMG dude! it's not censorship. it's marketing

Yeah, for God's sake, why would I expect NEWSWEEK to report news instead of feature stories about photographers.

Quite honestly, it's pathetic and if the same happened with a Dem president in office, I'd bitch about the same thing. Report the damn news.

Posted by venomX on Sep-26-2006 18:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
OMG dude! it's not censorship. it's marketing

you can rebrand it all you want, its still censorship, even if its censorship due to monetary convinience aka. marketing.