Guy Builds Stonehenge - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Guy Builds Stonehenge

Posted by Trazedict on Oct-22-2006 02:41:

Guy Builds Stonehenge

....without any machinery.
This is really fascinating, and ingenius as well.

link here

Posted by tubularbills on Oct-22-2006 02:48:

interesting. nice find.

Posted by Clinkz913 on Oct-22-2006 03:00:

quote:
Originally posted by tubularbills
interesting. nice find.

c0r news worthy.

Posted by tubularbills on Oct-22-2006 03:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Clinkz913
c0r news worthy.

nah....if someone from the c0r had done it....thne.....oh yes, then it would be news worthy

Posted by nchs09 on Oct-22-2006 03:14:

sick!

Posted by Masonious on Oct-22-2006 04:00:

so how do you get the rocks to lie across the top of the two pillars?

Posted by nchs09 on Oct-22-2006 04:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Masonious
so how do you get the rocks to lie across the top of the two pillars?
i thought about that, but im shure if he can do that shit, there has to be a way with rope or something.

Posted by babyvsrhino on Oct-22-2006 04:20:

my guess is the technique he used to get it to 3 ft but kept going.

Posted by nchs09 on Oct-22-2006 04:25:

quote:
Originally posted by babyvsrhino
my guess is the technique he used to get it to 3 ft but kept going.
or that

Posted by Masonious on Oct-22-2006 04:29:

i can see getting the horizontal stone piece high enough, i'm not quite sure how they could move something with such mass on top of the other two pieces. if he can show me how to do that with such simple methods i'll be impressed.

Posted by Enigmatic XTC on Oct-22-2006 04:39:

probably with the rolling method

Posted by mezzir on Oct-22-2006 05:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Masonious
i can see getting the horizontal stone piece high enough, i'm not quite sure how they could move something with such mass on top of the other two pieces. if he can show me how to do that with such simple methods i'll be impressed.

i think i got it kinda worked out
imagine the 3ft method got him to like 12 or w/e, and its eventually going to be about 9 ft up. you then, with that standing there and supports to keep it from shifting or falling standing perpindicular to it, you then place the two upright vertical beams. after those are in place, they should be 3ft lower than the cross beam, so there's a 3ft gap between the vertical stones and the crossbeam

then i'm not sure if technically you could reverse the 3ft method
i feel like it might be more difficult, but doable
if not than then burn the pieces holding the horizontal crossbeam in place, and eventually it should fall down in place
i just dunno if doing it that way it'd fall evenly or just real quick and fall over
idk

Posted by mezzir on Oct-22-2006 05:34:

also from that site, holy shit
this kid has echo location?

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=20140
wtfffff thats ridiculous

Posted by Pesto on Oct-22-2006 07:41:

quote:
Originally posted by mezzir
also from that site, holy shit
this kid has echo location?

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=20140
wtfffff thats ridiculous

sweet!