TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Paul Oakenfold - Not Over
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Paul Oakenfold - Not Over
Heard this on Sirius, Awsome track IMHO. Better than the Original from Grace. Anyone Fimiliar with the track? I bet it sounds awsome in the club.
it's horrible & redudant. Oakenfold butchers His & Steve Osbourne (heavy emphasis on osbourne)'s classic.
Are you talking about the track itself? There are 2 Mixes from Oakenfold that I know of... And of course, Thats your Opinion. I happen to really enjoy the track.
Grace = Paul Oakenfold, Steve Osbourne & Dominique Atkins
Osbourne & Oakenfold produced the original Not Over Yet in 1993 with Dominique Atkins on vocals
1995 came BT Mixes
1999 came the Breeder Mixes (and also some shit remixes by Anthony Acid & DJ Skribble)
2006 came Oakenfold's Remake. it's horrible, it's redudant. and it's just yet another sign thtat oakenfold is just a washed up, out-of-ideas, talantless monkey
Sounds like something Anjunabeats would churn out.
Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Legs Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Legs Now see, The original from 1993 has Horrable Vocals i think. The Newer one is much Cleaner and Strait Forward IMHO Of Course... Because a DJ Mixes a Tune doesnt neccesaraly mean he is out of ideas, maybe he thought he could better the song? |
I like the new vocals and the new lyrics, the melodies and the production aren't that exciting, so overall it's a decent tune i would say.
"Paul Oakenfold - Not Over" ?
More like "Paul Oakenfold - DEFINITELY Over" 
He should take his money and retire quietly, rather than embarrass himself with pathetic mixing and awful remixes of classic tunes.
I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by SkooB_E I don't think those two songs should even be compared. This is so different from the old one it's a totally new song. |
It's all about BT's Spirit of Grace Mix 
Mixed Reviews huh. And no, I wasnt joking.
Original and BT Remix rock. Simply awesome, it's amazing how BT manages to make the track uplifting anf euphoric, and funky at the sametime. The piano breakdown is to die for too.
The 2006 Oakey version I also love. Maybe not the most serious of trancer, but its damn catchy and the male vocal is good, and works. What's more few can argue that it isn't the best track on his recent album.
"Breeder's It Is Now Remix" FTW!
anybody has a sample of this tune?
thnx,
Bidor 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by IpLaYWiTLiGhTs "Breeder's It Is Now Remix" FTW! |
dj legs can u change your signature. that is the ugliest fuck i have ever seen and it is hurting my eyes.....
but oakenfold has been around now for more than 25 years, he had to run out of ideas eventually lol
Why would he need to better it? BT has already remixed it.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by IpLaYWiTLiGhTs "Breeder's It Is Now Remix" FTW! |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Sykonee Sounds like something Anjunabeats would churn out. |
matt darey's remix was also pretty cool imho.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancepunkk dj legs can u change your signature. that is the ugliest fuck i have ever seen and it is hurting my eyes..... |
His remix of JT's new tune, my love, is quite tasty.
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.