TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- How Bolier & Coenraad Steal A Melody!
Pages (6): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »


Posted by Paul.Vinitsky on Oct-29-2006 07:25:

How Bolier & Coenraad Steal A Melody!

I will not say too much words. But I think that world trance community have to know their heroes!
I think a lot of us listen to ASOT with Armin van Buuren. In episode 272 Armin presented new track of new collab of Cliff Coenraad and very known Leon Bolier. The track is called "The Mighty Ducks" and Armin wrote that it's signed to Intuition Recordings in a tracklist.

Now let us see the other side of the question. In november 2005 I wrote a mellow for my new track "Irony", a month later I produced whole track and in 14 december 2005 I sent a promo to some big labels, including United Recordings and Fundamental Recordings, the head labels for Intuition.
The track was not signed in 2005 because of not good sound and mixing (it was my basic experience in producing). In 2006 soon I had to sign it in reworked version. But this week we found new track from Leon Bolier in ASOT!

Let us listen to the parts of both tracks.

Paul Vinitsky Original - here
Bolier & Coenraad - here

If Intuition will release "The Mighty Ducks" I'm ready to initiate a judgement process because I have foundations to prove that this track was written by myself in 2005.

So dear friends please be very accurate with sending your promos. In a year it can appear in abit modified form with the big variety that new artists will don't even change a sound.


Posted by clubamerica on Oct-29-2006 07:42:

RIPOFFFF


Posted by Sav0n on Oct-29-2006 07:46:

thats not good


Posted by TweeK on Oct-29-2006 08:16:

Interesting.

I wonder how much of this sort of thing goes on with out being noticed.


Posted by Sinnica Hax on Oct-29-2006 09:15:

that sucks bigtime this only motivates one even more to kick up your own digital label


Posted by Purple on Oct-29-2006 09:19:

very bad, shame.


Posted by Push2005 on Oct-29-2006 09:48:



Fucking thieves


Posted by DJ GeRmAn on Oct-29-2006 09:49:

Bloody labels these days


Posted by Ian Holing on Oct-29-2006 09:52:

Evil1

What a crap mate this kind of things gives bad feelings to our music world.. :/


Posted by staticblue on Oct-29-2006 10:09:

nice move, Leon. Really nice.


Posted by vascotia on Oct-29-2006 10:20:

In 2006 soon I HAD TO SIGN IT in reworked version. But this week we found new track from Leon Bolier in ASOT!

** that means that u havent signed it yet? (but were going to?)...hmm.. then u dont have that much case in a court im afraid.. unfortunately If something isnt official signed to any labels or websites with copyrights, people have the right to do whatever they want..

BUT, if this is a rip-off (which it surely sounds like: the patch is the same aswell as most of the melody), it truly sucks and is not fair to anyone..

Hope u sort out this between u guys in a good way.


Posted by C-quence on Oct-29-2006 10:24:

1. The melody is not the same. The sound seems the same but that can happen when presets are used.
2. I've heard such melodies from Leon for 3 years now, he has made more of such breaks. I know him in real life, he's a nice guy who doesn't copy melodies from others.
3. Good luck with your judgement process... Even if an artist like scooter copies a melody for about 95% you can't get it right in court. And in this case the melody is totally different.

So I guess you have to try to get your track signed...


Posted by Camwin on Oct-29-2006 10:30:

Rememeber people, there are two producers here.
You can't blame/praise one and not blame/praise the other.


Posted by Paul.Vinitsky on Oct-29-2006 10:32:

Thx for support, friends.

Vascotia, on the regulations of the author's right. Not only a contract with label could confirm the rights of the author. There are some another things to make it. And I have them. Try to do something, because such things "kill" a lot of very talent begginer artists...


Posted by Mycron on Oct-29-2006 10:34:

i think the melody is almost the same, there is only a small change in Leon's version, but that's just my opinion...


Posted by Paul.Vinitsky on Oct-29-2006 10:35:

quote:
Originally posted by C-quence
1. The melody is not the same. The sound seems the same but that can happen when presets are used.
2. I've heard such melodies from Leon for 3 years now, he has made more of such breaks. I know him in real life, he's a nice guy who doesn't copy melodies from others.
3. Good luck with your judgement process... Even if an artist like scooter copies a melody for about 95% you can't get it right in court. And in this case the melody is totally different.

So I guess you have to try to get your track signed...


Cquence, of course it's coincidence, what a friend of Leon can say in such a situation. If he wrotes this breakdown 3 years ago, let us prove that!


Posted by DJ Nickazz on Oct-29-2006 10:35:

Seriously all I could think of right now is PWNED


Posted by Paul.Vinitsky on Oct-29-2006 10:36:

quote:
Originally posted by C-quence
1. The melody is not the same. The sound seems the same but that can happen when presets are used.
2. I've heard such melodies from Leon for 3 years now, he has made more of such breaks. I know him in real life, he's a nice guy who doesn't copy melodies from others.
3. Good luck with your judgement process... Even if an artist like scooter copies a melody for about 95% you can't get it right in court. And in this case the melody is totally different.

So I guess you have to try to get your track signed...


Cquence, of course it's coincidence, what a friend of Leon can say in such a situation. If he wrotes this breakdown 3 years ago, let us prove that!


Posted by Ian Holing on Oct-29-2006 10:41:

I should say that imo the melody almost the same, only a bit changed, maybe a coincidence? I don know but I won't wager for this option.

This is my opinion, but we should listen the two sides of this history..


Posted by Ian Holing on Oct-29-2006 10:41:

I should say that imo the melody almost the same, only a bit changed, maybe a coincidence? I don know but I wouldn't wager for this option.

This is my opinion, but we should listen the two sides of this history..


Posted by Maor Levi on Oct-29-2006 10:48:

i would say originally it might be sound simillar but its still different no matter what u say...Different Sound , Different octave , everything. Scooter ripped off Push - Strange World...and? nothing.

not to mention there are 100000000000 trance tunes that sound simillar and some completely identical...i dont think u can do anything about it since there's always way to win here , u dont have any copyrights for this melody beacuse u havnt signed it im afraid...and even if u do leon can change a small note in the melody and it will turn into his own melody just beacuse of a 1 single note...


Posted by TOR on Oct-29-2006 10:51:

What Maor said..


Posted by Paul.Vinitsky on Oct-29-2006 10:54:

quote:
Originally posted by C-quence
1. The melody is not the same. The sound seems the same but that can happen when presets are used.
2. I've heard such melodies from Leon for 3 years now, he has made more of such breaks. I know him in real life, he's a nice guy who doesn't copy melodies from others.
3. Good luck with your judgement process... Even if an artist like scooter copies a melody for about 95% you can't get it right in court. And in this case the melody is totally different.

So I guess you have to try to get your track signed...


Cquence, of course it's coincidence, what a friend of Leon can say in such a situation. If he wrotes this breakdown 3 years ago, let us prove that!


Posted by alexpea on Oct-29-2006 10:56:

But hey.. even if a track isn't signed, it can still be copyrighted?
However, you must have actual proof of that YOU made it. Date as well, so that it can be verified that your production actually was made BEFORE the suspected reproduction.

Soundclick has made this possible by giving the artist an option of not letting anyone download the track, and only stream it. It also shows the date when the track is added - and therefore proof of when it's added ( promoted ).. Some also send the track on a cd-r to themself ( via normal mail ) and then don't break the sealing. That's also a way of proving the date when the track \ melody came to the world.


Posted by Paul.Vinitsky on Oct-29-2006 11:01:

quote:
Originally posted by alexpea
But hey.. even if a track isn't signed, it can still be copyrighted?
However, you must have actual proof of that YOU made it. Date as well, so that it can be verified that your production actually was made BEFORE the suspected reproduction.

Soundclick has made this possible by giving the artist an option of not letting anyone download the track, and only stream it. It also shows the date when the track is added - and therefore proof of when it's added ( promoted ).. Some also send the track on a cd-r to themself ( via normal mail ) and then don't break the sealing. That's also a way of proving the date when the track \ melody came to the world.


You're completely right. I'm not too stupid to make such conflict from clear page. Too many coinceidence for 1 time.


Pages (6): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.