TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Taliban: 'We Are Targeting Europe'


Posted by erdega on Nov-06-2006 03:53:

Taliban: 'We Are Targeting Europe'

Will the european terrorist appeasers cower in fear again and fold, leaving the one true battle behind ? I think this is a serious threat given that all the terrorist organisations have bases and operate freely throughout the european union. I do notice that no continental European military dares to take on Taliban in the south of Afghanistan leaving the fight to the Americans, Canucks, Aussies and Brits respectivelly .

http://www.flurl.com/item/Taliban_Interview_u_197570

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article...1238172,00.html


Posted by Q5echo on Nov-06-2006 04:09:

Europe is not built to fight wars. you should know that.

the Taliban will not only hit the weakest targets but targets that will get the best "bang for their limited bucks". kinda like how they treat their women. cowardly IMO.

if that target is in Europe so be it. it will only show the world how weak and petty the Taliban really is.

if i could, i would advise them against it and tell them to try and hit Amerikkka directly as opposed to Europe.


Posted by erdega on Nov-06-2006 04:20:

they hit america ones already but I agree in that they are targeting Europe to isolate America in afghanistan but on the other hand euros there are not fighting at all, they are in the north and doing social works far away from taliban


Posted by Lilith on Nov-06-2006 08:38:

Yes because the Afgans dont deserve utilities and houses built with foreign aid, education facilities and a fair go at life because that would make them educated, conciencious objectors against the Taliban and their 15th century, draconian laws.
Intellectually, socially and physically too weak too resist

Basically youre just here because your probably too much of a limp wristed fairy too ever bother picking up arms too defend your beliefs, not when you can anonymously go attention seeking on the internet with the direct intent too just flame away with an obviously unpopular opinion.


Posted by Krypton on Nov-06-2006 14:51:

What, you all don't like sharia law?


Posted by star-traveller on Nov-06-2006 15:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
Europe is not built to fight wars. you should know that.

...


There were 2 World Wars and a Napoleon War. They all were in Europe.

What do you need else ?


Posted by erdega on Nov-06-2006 18:26:

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Yes because the Afgans dont deserve utilities and houses built with foreign aid, education facilities and a fair go at life because that would make them educated, conciencious objectors against the Taliban and their 15th century, draconian laws.
Intellectually, socially and physically too weak too resist

Basically youre just here because your probably too much of a limp wristed fairy too ever bother picking up arms too defend your beliefs, not when you can anonymously go attention seeking on the internet with the direct intent too just flame away with an obviously unpopular opinion.



LMAO , There are too many Taliban in Afghanistan and only 20k occupation NATO troops most of whom are afraid to fight against Taliban. My question is why are you not in Afghanistan ? They will quit Afghanistan even sooner than they quit Iraq. And let's remember it was CIA who trained and armed Taliban to begin with when their savagery was useful to Washington but alas they grew too much and turned on their masters


Posted by Lilith on Nov-06-2006 19:57:

quote:
Originally posted by erdega
LMAO , There are too many Taliban in Afghanistan and only 20k occupation NATO troops most of whom are afraid to fight against Taliban. My question is why are you not in Afghanistan ? They will quit Afghanistan even sooner than they quit Iraq. And let's remember it was CIA who trained and armed Taliban to begin with when their savagery was useful to Washington but alas they grew too much and turned on their masters


Most of the Taliban where sponsored to some degree by Pakistan, the US ceased their official support of the Mujahideen in 1989 when the Soviets left. If you've got any concrete, unbiased documentation too say otherwise I'm sure the world would be interested in seeing it.
Why was I not in Afganistan?
Lots of different reasons, mostly because I'm a South African national with British citizenship who's a refugee from Zimbabwe after losing my property there, currently living in Australia. Needless too say I had a lot of other personal concerns and most armies have very little use for a 5'2 foot tall beauty therapist/property developer who isnt a very good shot.

Maybe I'm not the most credible source of information but I have a good memory from history and travelled around the world twice and comparatively unbiased in my opinions.
If you want too be taken even half seriously you might want too try looking at unbiased opinions aside from your own that arent political propoganda.


Posted by Purple on Nov-06-2006 22:37:

Bad strategy, I think they should keep focusing on American invaders.. better strategy would be to focus on UK too... cos if UK withdraws from all this chaos and mayhem US has created after 911..US will be truely isolated.. it will sort of cut off their right hand.


Posted by Moral Hazard on Nov-07-2006 17:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Bad strategy, I think they should keep focusing on American invaders.. better strategy would be to focus on UK too... cos if UK withdraws from all this chaos and mayhem US has created after 911..US will be truely isolated.. it will sort of cut off their right hand.


Given that Canada is doing most of the heavy work in Afganistan I question how getting the UK out would help the Taliban.


Posted by Purple on Nov-07-2006 18:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Moral Hazard
Given that Canada is doing most of the heavy work in Afganistan I question how getting the UK out would help the Taliban.


Its not about numbers game, like there are more Canadians or Spanish people, than Taliban should attack them and make them flee..

Its about strategy, we all know that off all of US allies UK is the most vulnarebale at the moment.. and the irony is its also the strogest ally of US in all this.. US relies on UK for lobbying its agenda .. if UK is hit and reliases that it unnecesarily got itself into such a mess for nothing.. and if UK washes its hands from all of this and withdraw its support from all this bloodbath US has caused.. than US will be rendered very weak..


Posted by Fir3start3r on Nov-08-2006 01:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Purple
Its not about numbers game, like there are more Canadians or Spanish people, than Taliban should attack them and make them flee..


HAAHAHAHAAH!!!

Sorry, but Canadians are kicking too much ass.

Obviously you're not aware of our sniper capability...


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Nov-08-2006 01:54:

and people are always forgetting about the australian SAS which have been sodomising the poor taliban militias


Posted by Boomer187 on Nov-08-2006 02:19:

its actually a perfect target, as much as americans hate bush and all these new security laws going into effect, it is making it harder to attack the US. Therefore the only news coverage the taliban are getting is 'terror plan thwarted' n such. so now they pick the relatively easier to hit targets and get back in the news.


least thats my take on it.


Posted by St_Andrew on Nov-08-2006 20:58:

I love the first two posts of this thread:

quote:
Originally posted by erdega
all the terrorist organisations have bases and operate freely throughout the european union.




quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
Europe is not built to fight wars. you should know that.




Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.