TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Rumsfeld Resigns!
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by RJT on Nov-08-2006 20:30:

Rumsfeld Resigns!

Press conference now!

What do you guys think about this? Why now - After defending Rumsfeld for so long, why is it suddenly his job to step down? Do you think he's worried about the Dem's investigating his motivations for and execution of the Iraq war?

Exciting day for Americans today...


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 20:31:

Condi is the only left.


Posted by mezzir on Nov-08-2006 20:33:

tough choice for bush
i bet he would've liked to keep rumsfeld and with the dem's taking more power he kinda had to show a sign of change, and this is it
however, if he bit the bullet he could've done this a week or two ago and i bet it would've help the republicans win some key districts they lost to the dems yesterday


but on another note...w00t!
so whats up with the new guy?

also, good to see another political junkie here in the cor rjt (besides occrider)


Posted by RJT on Nov-08-2006 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Condi is the only left.


Unfortunately don't see her going anywhere anytime soon.

Overly reactionary political statement of the day: Rumsfeld and Bush should both be tried as war criminals.

Agree or disagree? (To all of you)


Posted by stren on Nov-08-2006 20:34:

another elephant down.


Posted by mezzir on Nov-08-2006 20:35:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Unfortunately don't see her going anywhere anytime soon.

Overly reactionary political statement of the day: Rumsfeld and Bush should both be tried as war criminals.

Agree or disagree? (To all of you)


possibly, but not yet
no way we can do that until the war's over (lol)
also any attempt to bring about such a trial would hurt the public image of those supporting the idea


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 20:36:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Unfortunately don't see her going anywhere anytime soon.

Overly reactionary political statement of the day: Rumsfeld and Bush should both be tried as war criminals.

Agree or disagree? (To all of you)



Not gonna happen... as soon as another Rep. president takes the reigns, Bush will be pardoned.


Posted by RJT on Nov-08-2006 20:37:

quote:
Originally posted by mezzir
possibly, but not yet
no way we can do that until the war's over (lol)
also any attempt to bring about such a trial would hurt the public image of those supporting the idea


I agree with that for the most part, but I do think they could both be tried before the war is over. The war will likely not end by the completiong of Bush's term in office, and quite frankly, I can't see a sitting US president ever being tried for war crimes. However, I do think (read: hope) that following his term, there will be substantial investigation into the legitimacy of this war - And that the responsibilty will hopefully fall squarely on the both of their shoulders.


Posted by RJT on Nov-08-2006 20:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Not gonna happen... as soon as another Rep. president takes the reigns, Bush will be pardoned.


That would be fine and well if he was tried in the U.S., but if the international community decides Bush deserves to be tried, a U.S. pardon will do fuck all to protect him.


Posted by UWM on Nov-08-2006 20:41:


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 20:41:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
That would be fine and well if he was tried in the U.S., but if the international community decides Bush deserves to be tried, a U.S. pardon will do fuck all to protect him.



Whoa, what youre implying is that the UN is actually gonna do something?

I LOL'D!


Posted by RJT on Nov-08-2006 20:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Whoa, what youre implying is that the UN is actually gonna do something?

I LOL'D!


Yeah.

I'm a shitty naive idealist.


Posted by mezzir on Nov-08-2006 20:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Whoa, what youre implying is that the UN is actually gonna do something?

I LOL'D!

hey there...you don't know how moon's gonna run things
i think its a step in the right direction, UN might get off their asses a bit more
idk...never been a bit fan of kofi annan


Posted by bogartgreens on Nov-08-2006 20:46:

quote:
Originally posted by mezzir
hey there...you don't know how moon's gonna run things
i think its a step in the right direction, UN might get off their asses a bit more
idk...never been a bit fan of kofi annan


sorry but imo the UN has been pretty worthless since its inception..


Posted by Marc Summers on Nov-08-2006 20:47:

Sweet ass election day

Dems scared rumsfeld out


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 20:47:

Having the UN around is a crime against humanity, because it gives false hope.


Posted by Ted Promo on Nov-08-2006 20:47:

finally. I didn't know he was 74 though


Posted by RJT on Nov-08-2006 20:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
Having the UN around is a crime against humanity, because it gives false hope.




Vlad is on fire today.


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 20:51:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT


Vlad is on fire today.




Posted by Akridrot on Nov-08-2006 20:51:

... Only to be replaced with this guy:


quote:

Intelligence career
While at Indiana University, Gates was recruited to join the Central Intelligence Agency. But before joining the CIA full-time as an intelligence analyst, he spent two years in the Air Force; one job was giving intelligence briefings to ICBM missile crews at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. (The CIA offered no exemption from the draft during the Vietnam War.)[2]

Gates left the CIA in 1974 to serve on the National Security Council staff but returned to the CIA in late 1979. He was named the Director of the DCI/DDCI Executive Staff in 1981, Deputy Director for Intelligence in 1982, and Deputy Director of Central Intelligence from April 18, 1986, to March 20, 1989. He was nominated to become the Director of Central Intelligence in early 1987, but withdrew the nomination after it became clear the Senate would reject it due to controversy[3] about his role in the Iran-Contra affair. Senate members later queried the nomination for the additional reason that Gates allegedly passed intelligence to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war.[4]

Gates was Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs from March until August of 1989, and was Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser from August 1989 until November 1991. He was nominated (for the second time) for the position of Director of Central Intelligence by President Bush on May 14, 1991, confirmed by the Senate on November 5, and sworn in on November 6, becoming the only career officer in the CIA's history (as of 2005) to rise from entry-level employee to Director. Deputy Directors during his tenure were Richard J. Kerr (from November 6, 1991, until March 2, 1992) and Adm. William O. Studeman (from April 9, 1992, through the remainder of Dr. Gates� tenure).

During his 26-year career as an intelligence professional, he spent almost nine years on the National Security Council, serving four Presidents of both major political parties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gates




quote:

[...]he lied as to his ignorance of key matters in the Iran-Contra affair and that he distorted the production of intelligence estimates to serve the political ends of his boss, former Reagan campaign director William Casey. In this respect, one critic testified that Gates pushed the administration line on "narcoterrorism," which blamed drug trafficking on leftwing states and insurgent movements (see Chapter 2). [...]

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/D...e_Politics.html


more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006...in2163357.shtml


Posted by mezzir on Nov-08-2006 20:59:

he was involved in iran-contra?




i think i speak for the entire cor when i say 'fuck.'


Posted by mdamon7278 on Nov-08-2006 21:10:

Can we bring our troops home now?


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 21:13:

quote:
Originally posted by mdamon7278
Can we bring our troops home now?



I hope the liberals dont think that the war will end cold turkey, whether complete control of congress, the presidency... doesnt matter. Fact of the matter is, they are there to stay until something is worked out in Iraq. Read between the lines guys, Democrats arent against the war, they are just against the way the Republicans are doing it.


Posted by mdamon7278 on Nov-08-2006 21:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Vlad
I hope the liberals dont think that the war will end cold turkey, whether complete control of congress, the presidency... doesnt matter. Fact of the matter is, they are there to stay until something is worked out in Iraq. Read between the lines guys, Democrats arent against the war, they are just against the way the Republicans are doing it.


I agree, at least start cutting down the amount of troops we have over there, bring them home 6 months-1 yr, and rotate the divisons, we really dont need 170,000, too much


Posted by Vlad on Nov-08-2006 21:22:

quote:
Originally posted by mdamon7278
I agree, at least start cutting down the amount of troops we have over there, bring them home 6 months-1 yr, and rotate the divisons, we really dont need 170,000, too much



I think so too... but they are milking a dry cow.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.