TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Borat: Humiliated frat boys sue over 'Borat' portrayal
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Borat: Humiliated frat boys sue over 'Borat' portrayal
SANTA MONICA, California (AP) -- Two fraternity boys want to make lawsuit against "Borat" over their drunken appearance in the hit movie.
The legal action filed Thursday on their behalf claims they were duped into appearing in the spoof documentary "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan," in which they made racist and sexist comments on camera.
The young men "engaged in behavior that they otherwise would not have engaged in," the lawsuit says.
"Borat" follows the adventures of comedian Sacha Baron Cohen's Kazakh journalist character in a blend of fiction and improvised comic encounters as he travels across the United States and mocks Americans.
The plaintiffs were not named in the lawsuit "to protect themselves from any additional and unnecessary embarrassment." They were identified in the movie as fraternity members from a South Carolina university, and appeared drunk as they made insulting comments about women and minorities to Cohen's character.
The lawsuit claims that in October 2005, a production crew took the students to a bar to drink and "loosen up" before participating in what they were told would be a documentary to be shown outside of the United States.
"They were induced to agree to participate and were told the name of the fraternity and the name of their school wouldn't be used," said the plaintiffs' attorney, Olivier Taillieu. "They were put into an RV and were made to believe they were picking up Borat the hitchhiker."
After a bout of heavy drinking, the plaintiffs signed a release form they were told "had something to do with reliability issues with being in the RV," Taillieu said.
The film "made plaintiffs the object of ridicule, humiliation, mental anguish and emotional and physical distress, loss of reputation, goodwill and standing in the community," the lawsuit said.
It names 20th Century Fox, a unit of News Corp., and three production companies as defendants.
Studio spokesman Gregg Brilliant said the lawsuit "has no merit."
The plaintiffs were seeking an injunction to stop the studio from displaying their image and likeness, along with unspecified monetary damages.
"Borat" debuted as the top movie last weekend with $26.5 million.
SOURCE
It's like Girls Gone Wild tactics, but revered on the men. HA!
Ahahahahah. If Kazakhstan tried to sue Borat unsuccessfully, these guys have no chance.
Besides, they signed a release form, that's pretty much it for them right there. Doesn't matter if they were drunk/didn't read it.
Lastly, as I understand, no one actually told them what to say, so they were playing themselves, it's no one else's fault everyone now knows they're sexist bastards.
Good to know they won't be getting pussy for a while though, HAH.
gaylords
lol
frat??? that's derogatory. It's fraternity. What do you call a country, a c***? 
They were Chi Phis anyways, nothing new.
/Sammy
Wow serious , well i hope it isnt taken of the screens. i still havent watched the movie yet. 
They look like morons...HIGH FIVE!!!! 
throw the frat boys down the well!
wow. i would go hide. they said some pretty bad shit!
contract is void
In America, if a person can prove that they were taken advantage of(ie: the directors or whoever talked them into the contract intentionally got them drunk to get them to sign it, then they have a case. a contract is void if they were mentally impaired. It would be like getting someone drunk and talking them into selling their 25k dollar rolex for 100 bucks. BUT......they have to be able to prove it.
I hope they get a girl judge
the second i saw that bit, i knew that one kid in the yellow was never gonna get laid again
they should win the case, but you're right pett. That dude isn't getting in play for a while. and either way their reputations are ruined but that's why they have a case.... because they were tricked into it.
They still stated their own opinions. What they said is what they said.
If I were them, I would have just kept quiet and if anyone asked me about it in person, tell them I was following a script. *shrug*
lol whatever everyone says stupid shit once and a while i think ive said worse then those two drunk guys.. plus they were intised by borat. Give these kids a break. In all honesty.. how many girls out there took those guys seriously?
what kind of frat guys have never seen borat/ali g by now?
and they signed a release, so they = f00ked.
What they said or STFU.
obviously they just want to make money off this, if they cared about their reputation so much they wouldn't have signed that paper.
Re: contract is void
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Euphoric In America, if a person can prove that they were taken advantage of(ie: the directors or whoever talked them into the contract intentionally got them drunk to get them to sign it, then they have a case. a contract is void if they were mentally impaired. It would be like getting someone drunk and talking them into selling their 25k dollar rolex for 100 bucks. BUT......they have to be able to prove it. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jayx1 throw the frat boys down the well! |
Re: Re: contract is void
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tatgirl Well, if it were THAT simple, the Girls Gone Wild tapes wouldn't exist. That company hosts nights at bars, gets everyone wasted for free, has them sign the waivers, and then encourages them to 'do stuff' for the camera. Sadly, nothing those girls can do. Now as for that rodeo guy- he can't even hide behind the "I was drunk and duped" excuse for the despicable things he said.... I hope he gets flooded with hate mail. |
Re: Re: Re: contract is void
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Slixter Actually, it can be that simple (depends on the circumstances etc)...and it works here in Canada as well. The guy that owns the GGW franchise has been sued for just that on many occasions. It's called signing a contract under duress. My mom and a few co-workers managed to sue the company they worked for a few years ago for the same thing. And as for the rodeo guy...he's screwed!!! |
Re: Re: Re: Re: contract is void
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tatgirl I know they've gotten sued plenty of times, but what came out of the legislation for the people who sue? Do they just win money, or do they get their scenes in the movies removed as well? Obviously, the GGW folks are still doing pretty well for themselves, and selling tapes as always. |
Re: Re: contract is void
| quote: |
| Originally posted by tatgirl Well, if it were THAT simple, the Girls Gone Wild tapes wouldn't exist. That company hosts nights at bars, gets everyone wasted for free, has them sign the waivers, and then encourages them to 'do stuff' for the camera. Sadly, nothing those girls can do. Now as for that rodeo guy- he can't even hide behind the "I was drunk and duped" excuse for the despicable things he said.... I hope he gets flooded with hate mail. |
Re: Re: Re: contract is void
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Slixter Actually, it can be that simple (depends on the circumstances etc)...and it works here in Canada as well. The guy that owns the GGW franchise has been sued for just that on many occasions. It's called signing a contract under duress. My mom and a few co-workers managed to sue the company they worked for a few years ago for the same thing. And as for the rodeo guy...he's screwed!!! |
but even that i am fairly certain doesnt count
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.