TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Shock Art [Offensive Material?]
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-07-2006 22:06:

Shock Art [Offensive Material?]

Time to dumb the boards down a bit. I can't take the deep intellectualism of the newest popping candy or amazing lightshows that make me remember the days when drugs formed a hole in my brain.

Instead lets talk art. Specifically art that is meant to create conroversy or at least evoke strong emotional reactions: ie shock art. Kind of like that cartoon of the prophet Muhammed that almost sparked WWIII. I run accross lots of interesting artists for my job and I spoke to one yesterday that inspired me to share.

Fred George: www.fredgeorge.com /www.vulcangirls.com

JESUS AS A SUICIDE BOMBER, was created by Fred George in 2000, prioor to 9/11. George experianced a "spirtual zeitgeist and was compelled to address the ways in which religious imagery; its symbosis, tenants and dieties can be minipulated as toold of propaganda.Link / Fox TV news clip (windows media)

AK-47 Crucifix, Four Meter High Crucifix constructed from AK-47 rifles aggressively challenges the manner in which the Cross has been effectively betrayed, divorced from its original meaning. It is now once again a symbol of war. Link/ Video Link

Any other art lovers out there care to share? I'll share more later.


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-07-2006 22:08:

Andres Serrano "Piss Christ" : Photo of a crucifix in his own piss and blood.


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-07-2006 22:19:

Marcel Duchamp: "L.H.O.O.Q." 1919 Which stands for "elle chaud au cul" or "She is Hot in the Ass".


Posted by infinity HiGH on Dec-07-2006 22:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Time2Burn
Andres Serrano "Piss Christ" : Photo of a crucifix in his own piss and blood.


i wonder what would happen if i showed this one to my grandmother.


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-07-2006 22:46:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH
i wonder what would happen if i showed this one to my grandmother.


She'd prolly like it until you told her what it was. Then you'd have to repent.


Posted by psiico111 on Dec-07-2006 22:55:

I like art as much as the next guy and I understand that sometimes art is about pushing boundries and making people re-examine the world they live in but stuff like the Piss Christ to me is cheap, sensationalist crap. There's pushing boundries for the sake of art and then there's pushing boundries for the sake of controversy and free publicity. How does a painting of Christ in piss and blood further anything other then the artist's career? It's seems unnecessarily offensive to me. It's not personally offensive to me, I'm a very fallen catholic, but certainly to others who haven't fallen as far as I have. I'm sensitive enough to other people's feelings to not make art like that were I an artist. I don't know, maybe I'm just not enlightened enough to understand art like that.


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Dec-08-2006 03:17:

quote:
Originally posted by Time2Burn
Andres Serrano "Piss Christ" : Photo of a crucifix in his own piss and blood.


For being made out of piss and blood that's a pretty good painting. I'm impressed.


Posted by English Rachel on Dec-08-2006 03:19:

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
For being made out of piss and blood that's a pretty good painting. I'm impressed.


I<3Lisa


Posted by petro on Dec-08-2006 03:20:

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
For being made out of piss and blood that's a pretty good painting. I'm impressed.


quote:
Photo of a crucifix in his own piss and blood.


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Dec-08-2006 03:35:

quote:
Originally posted by English Rachel
I<3Lisa


I <3 Rachel...b/c you're English.


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Dec-08-2006 03:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Tb.


I don't understand though...is it a photo of his painting?

Or he covered a crucifix in piss and there's blood around it and he took a shot?


Posted by FunkyCrew on Dec-08-2006 03:37:

Re: Shock Art [Offensive Material?]

quote:
Originally posted by Time2Burn
Time to dumb the boards down a bit. I can't take the deep intellectualism of the newest popping candy or amazing lightshows that make me remember the days when drugs formed a hole in my brain.


<3! end thread.


Posted by devnull on Dec-08-2006 03:37:

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
For being made out of piss and blood that's a pretty good painting. I'm impressed.


lol i never knew piss could be artsy!


Posted by Gypsy on Dec-08-2006 04:07:

quote:
Originally posted by Time2Burn
Marcel Duchamp: "L.H.O.O.Q." 1919 Which stands for "elle chaud au cul" or "She is Hot in the Ass".



oh look...they gave the mona lisa a mustache...the true mark of any artist..
this isn't 'art'. in what way does this comment on anything significant or invite any intellectual consideration? i could flip through the pages of Mad magazine and find more thought provoking images.


Posted by MarkT on Dec-08-2006 05:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Time2Burn
Marcel Duchamp: "L.H.O.O.Q." 1919 Which stands for "elle chaud au cul" or "She is Hot in the Ass".


LMAO

wow, how had I never heard/seen that before...awesome.


Posted by zokissima on Dec-08-2006 13:44:

quote:
Originally posted by psiico111
I like art as much as the next guy and I understand that sometimes art is about pushing boundries and making people re-examine the world they live in but stuff like the Piss Christ to me is cheap, sensationalist crap. There's pushing boundries for the sake of art and then there's pushing boundries for the sake of controversy and free publicity. How does a painting of Christ in piss and blood further anything other then the artist's career?

+1

Personally I find absolutely nothing innovative in shock art. Images and symbolism are being re-portrayed in a futile attempt to overexamine the original or currently perceived intent.

As for Vulcan girls....very striking, and beautiful photographs...but that's about it.


The ak-47 cross...wow really creative...definitely gets his point accross
Personally I see it as tacky...


Posted by Chris Allen on Dec-08-2006 14:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Gypsy
oh look...they gave the mona lisa a mustache...the true mark of any artist..
this isn't 'art'. in what way does this comment on anything significant or invite any intellectual consideration? i could flip through the pages of Mad magazine and find more thought provoking images.

Because this was in 1919, before MAD, before people decided they were going to do this. Consider this a reason on why MAD magazine actually does the same thing.

Remember years ago, and again in social thoughts today, the Statue of David, as it is nude, was once (and now again) considered Shock-Art.

'Most' art is some form of a statement, so it's of course debatable as to what would be considered 'shock' art.

An example of a form of 'shock' art could also be attributed to a political standpoint on a certain event in time. Guernica (one of my personal favorites) is a painting by Pablo Picasso, inspired by Picasso's horror at the Nazi German bombing of Guernica, Spain on April 26, 1937 during the Spanish Civil War. The air raid destroyed the city, killing a number of people variously estimated between 300 and 1,600, and injuring many more.

quote:
The huge mural was produced under a commission by the Spanish Republican government to decorate the Spanish Pavilion at the Paris International Exposition (the 1937 World's Fair in Paris). Picasso said as he worked on the mural:

quote:
The Spanish struggle is the fight of reaction against the people, against freedom. My whole life as an artist has been nothing more than a continuous struggle against reaction and the death of art. How could anybody think for a moment that I could be in agreement with reaction and death? ... In the panel on which I am working, which I shall call Guernica, and in all my recent works of art, I clearly express my abhorrence of the military caste which has sunk Spain in an ocean of pain and death.




In its final form, Guernica is an immense black and white, eleven-and-one-half-foot tall and almost twenty-six feet wide mural painted in oil. In creating Guernica, Picasso had no interest in painting the non-representational abstraction typical of some of his contemporaries, such as Malevich. The mural presents a scene of death, violence, brutality, suffering, and helplessness without portraying their immediate causes. The choice to paint in black and white contrasts with the intensity of the scene depicted and invokes the immediacy of a newspaper photograph.

Hidden images in Guernica. This de-contrasting of the lower portion of the horse makes it easier to discern the hidden skull-in-profille in the painting. The bull's head is formed mostly by the bent front leg. The head's nose is formed by the leg's knee cap.



Guernica depicts suffering people, animals, and buildings wrenched by violence and chaos.



Source:
Wikipedia


Posted by infinity HiGH on Dec-08-2006 14:18:

quote:
Originally posted by *~LiSa-LoO~*
I don't understand though...is it a photo of his painting?

Or he covered a crucifix in piss and there's blood around it and he took a shot?




its a painting...depicting jesus on a crucifix in his own piss and blood...


Posted by *~LiSa-LoO~* on Dec-08-2006 15:05:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH


its a painting...depicting jesus on a crucifix in his own piss and blood...


omg...I'm slow...thanks Peter


Posted by psiico111 on Dec-08-2006 15:54:

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Allen
An example of a form of 'shock' art could also be attributed to a political standpoint on a certain event in time.


I don't think shocking Nazis is on par with shocking Christians or Muslims, but I get your point. What shocks is a matter of personal point of view.


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-08-2006 16:05:

quote:
Originally posted by infinity HiGH


its a painting...depicting jesus on a crucifix in his own piss and blood...


Let me clear this up. He put his piss and blood in a jar and put a small crucifix inside and took a photo.

Source (Wikipedia)

His work "Blood and Piss III" was used as a Metalica Album cover:

Photo is too large to post here


Posted by Misanthrope on Dec-08-2006 19:33:

this thread rocks.
thanks Burn


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-08-2006 19:48:

quote:
Originally posted by psiico111
I like art as much as the next guy and I understand that sometimes art is about pushing boundries and making people re-examine the world they live in but stuff like the Piss Christ to me is cheap, sensationalist crap. There's pushing boundries for the sake of art and then there's pushing boundries for the sake of controversy and free publicity.


This is pretty much exactly how I feel too, well said. Art is such a subjective thing though and people react differently. However sensationalism exists in all facets of media and people eat it up. I think a true artist is in it for the love of art.


Posted by psiico111 on Dec-08-2006 20:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Time2Burn
Let me clear this up. He put his piss and blood in a jar and put a small crucifix inside and took a photo.

Source (Wikipedia)

His work "Blood and Piss III" was used as a Metalica Album cover:

Photo is too large to post here


I heard it was another bodily fluid besides piss that comes from the same place on the Metallica album cover. Gross either way.


Posted by Time2Burn on Dec-08-2006 20:11:

quote:
Originally posted by psiico111
I heard it was another bodily fluid besides piss that comes from the same place on the Metallica album cover. Gross either way.


Ya that too. I mean come on the Album is called "LOAD".


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.