TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- soooooooooo what happened to all the GOOD trance??
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »


Posted by Snarcher! on Dec-14-2006 04:44:

soooooooooo what happened to all the GOOD trance??

i used to listen to sets from oaky back in 99, pvd in 2000, armin in 2001.. great songs back to back!

now i hear a state of trance and its just one big blur of non-catchy crap..

are there any good artists left??


Posted by Spirit5 on Dec-14-2006 04:47:

Uh these threads are getting a bit ridiculous but I will say..Kamil Polner, if you want really catchy stuff. David West is another.
Go to Beatport, search around, you'll find some stuff you'll like. You will find some crap too, plenty of it, but you just have to sort through it, just like at a CD or vinyl shop.


Posted by spc on Dec-14-2006 05:02:

of course there are still good trance artists out there (not as much as there used to be imo) , but i know exactly where you're coming from... i haven't listened to ASOT lately, but the last ASOTs ive listened to haven't caught my attention. i don't really feel like sifting thru all the crap to find some decent trance releases, so i've moved onto other genres. whenever i need my trance fixes i usually listen to some old oakey cds, his 99 and 94 essentials, or make my own mixes of personal faves.


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Dec-14-2006 05:43:

These threads always give me odd experiences. There's something odd about someone complaining about the disappearance of a style that has been complained about for years.


Posted by jupiterone on Dec-14-2006 06:15:

What happened to all the good music from the 90's leading up to the year 2000? Trance isn't the only music genre affected by the this.


Posted by SMC on Dec-14-2006 08:09:

What happened to the 80s?


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Dec-14-2006 08:11:

Nah, the '70s, maaaaaaaan.


Posted by Cobalt on Dec-14-2006 08:44:

Trance has been dead since 2002. Sadly, this is something that any new listener to the genre must come to grips with. Progressive used to be a viable alternative, but it shed what was left of its tranciness in 2005, with all the "electro" shenanigans. There are a few patches of progressive left here and there, like the stuff Satoshi Tomiie is spinning as of late.

Today's techno, especially from Cologne and Canada, sounds closer to trance than anything now sold under that genre. For example:

Tom Pooks - Pablo Assan's
Mathew Jonson - Marionette


Posted by Cobalt on Dec-14-2006 08:50:

Oh, and I'm sure the progpsy members will chime in here, but the genre just doesn't do anything for me like classic Frankfurt or progressive trance did. Beats me.


Posted by Nik Novo on Dec-14-2006 09:19:

There is still good trance around, you just don't hear it anymore where you used to hear it 3 or 4 years ago

People like Paul van Dyk or Armin van Buuren that used to play great trance tunes that 3 or 4 years ago have developed in another direction that you probably want to hear. For me trance is anything but crap like "Selu Vibra - Divine" or "CJ Stone - Shine (Heart of Stone Mix)". That's why i don't listen to those two DJs very much anymore
Or let's rather say: Especially Paul has disappointed me just too much in the last 2 years. From about 10 times I've seen him, 8 times were just a horrific waste of time.


Posted by sherifyosti on Dec-14-2006 09:22:

Yeah sure 96 - 2004

the best era performance


Posted by kr00t0n on Dec-14-2006 09:23:

quote:
Originally posted by spc
of course there are still good trance artists out there (not as much as there used to be imo) , but i know exactly where you're coming from... i haven't listened to ASOT lately, but the last ASOTs ive listened to haven't caught my attention. i don't really feel like sifting thru all the crap to find some decent trance releases, so i've moved onto other genres. whenever i need my trance fixes i usually listen to some old oakey cds, his 99 and 94 essentials, or make my own mixes of personal faves.


I think it's actually more a case of the same number of decent tracks being about, much more shit ones, and a person's tastes evolving since they first started listening.

I found more tracks this year that I like than I did in 2002


Posted by Lilith on Dec-14-2006 09:37:

Late 90's and early 00's where full of junk too, tons of stuff that really didnt do very much for me at all and I'd end up trawling through tons of artists looking for a couple of good songs or looking at other genres for something interesting.

Essentially the way I figure it, if youre just going to be going to the one resteraunt for dinner youre going to end up jaded with the menu eventually even if the chef changes a few things.


Posted by Cobalt on Dec-14-2006 09:38:

quote:
Originally posted by Nik Novo
Or let's rather say: Especially Paul has disappointed me just too much in the last 2 years. From about 10 times I've seen him, 8 times were just a horrific waste of time.

I don't know what the hell happened to Paul. It's like some evil clone killed the man in 2002 and took his place. He had enough reputation that people excused Reflections as a major career misstep, that he would surely correct given the critical panning. But he didn't. He just kept throwing every scrap of credibility he had left into the fire, and keeps on going. Closing every set with the same old shit, pushing substandard vocals in every release, the SF Love Parade debacle, and on and on. I just don't even want to look anymore, because the state of the Vandit camp has become so ugly.


Posted by Cobalt on Dec-14-2006 09:41:

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Late 90's and early 00's where full of junk too, tons of stuff that really didnt do very much for me at all and I'd end up trawling through tons of artists looking for a couple of good songs or looking at other genres for something interesting.

Essentially the way I figure it, if youre just going to be going to the one resteraunt for dinner youre going to end up jaded with the menu eventually even if the chef changes a few things.

Not really. All you had to do was pick up a Global Underground or any halfway decent progressive trance compilation. Even though there was eurotrance shit on the market, good trance had just as high a profile, and was just as easy to find.

Not so today. In fact, good trance hardly even exists, much less gains a popular profile.


Posted by DJ_Eternal on Dec-14-2006 10:14:

I agree that there was just as much junk trance back in the so called golden era of trance as there is just now. Only problem now is the moajority of well produced junk is signed up to digital labels and more accessible to people browsing and listening online on the off chance that they might catch some of this. The more crap there is around, the more evidence there to support that above notion.

Any junk that managed to make it onto vinyl back then was discarded and forgotten about and never seen or heard of again, giving people the distorted perception that producers only churned out classics.

Of course, software production has become the norm now meaning there are a lot more artists vying for the same target market. You maybe get a gem of a producer from this but the majority will have a couple of tracks and fade off.


Posted by Arraias on Dec-14-2006 12:34:

quote:
Originally posted by kr00t0n
I think it's actually more a case of the same number of decent tracks being about, much more shit ones, and a person's tastes evolving since they first started listening.

I found more tracks this year that I like than I did in 2002


+ 1


Posted by gizzymcg on Dec-14-2006 12:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Cobalt
Trance has been dead since 2002.


Hmmm stil is the style of EDM that packs out the most clubs and festivals in compairson to the rest. Dead? No chance. A buit stagnant maybe for people who have been in the scene for a very long time (like myself). But there are shining lights out there both in the Djing bracket and production wise


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Dec-14-2006 12:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Cobalt
I don't know what the hell happened to Paul. It's like some evil clone killed the man in 2002 and took his place. He had enough reputation that people excused Reflections as a major career misstep, that he would surely correct given the critical panning. But he didn't. He just kept throwing every scrap of credibility he had left into the fire, and keeps on going. Closing every set with the same old shit, pushing substandard vocals in every release, the SF Love Parade debacle, and on and on. I just don't even want to look anymore, because the state of the Vandit camp has become so ugly.


Everything you've said in this thread has been spot on (as usual), and this is especially true. I know a lot of the purists think he went to shit when he re-released For An Angel, but he was still good quality right through the turn of the millenium. Then around 2002 he completely fell off the pace and he's kept on falling ever since.

To me Paul Van Dyk has always been a good sample of what the trance scene is like as a whole. Nascent and promising in the early 90s, majestic in the mid 90s, consistently excellent around the millenium and then ever more shit since.


Posted by Sykonee on Dec-14-2006 13:45:

quote:
Originally posted by gizzymcg
Hmmm stil is the style of EDM that packs out the most clubs and festivals in compairson to the rest. Dead? No chance. A buit stagnant maybe for people who have been in the scene for a very long time (like myself). But there are shining lights out there both in the Djing bracket and production wise

A lot of those packed clubs go for the DJ, not the actual music.


Posted by gizzymcg on Dec-14-2006 14:02:

quote:
Originally posted by Sykonee
A lot of those packed clubs go for the DJ, not the actual music.


Bollocks. Take Inside Out here in Glasgow people go for the reputation of the NIGHT and the music that it plays. Nites like Godskitchen, Crasher & The Gallery are exactly the same so your point is pointless


Posted by Camwin on Dec-14-2006 14:10:

It's not the DJ, it's the music he plays.

In this case it's the music to blame.


Posted by Sykonee on Dec-14-2006 14:20:

quote:
Originally posted by gizzymcg
Bollocks. Take Inside Out here in Glasgow people go for the reputation of the NIGHT and the music that it plays. Nites like Godskitchen, Crasher & The Gallery are exactly the same so your point is pointless

Ah, heh. My mistake. Going on the perspective we get way out here in Vancouver on the other side of the world.


Posted by gizzymcg on Dec-14-2006 14:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Sykonee
Ah, heh. My mistake. Going on the perspective we get way out here in Vancouver on the other side of the world.


I can see how its easy to think that way especially if you live in a place where the scene is bare on the ground. People tend to only come out for big names but thats in all forms of dance music not just trance imo.


Posted by Snarcher! on Dec-14-2006 15:39:

well it seems like all the big trance DJ's are terrified of playing something like AYLA - AYLA veracocha mix or something becuase it might offend the cheese gods or something, so they try to spin real "mature" trance but its just not fun/uplifting/interesting to hear the same boring shit the whole way thru a 3 hours ASOT,


Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.