100 x 100 - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- 100 x 100
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by gtron on Dec-14-2006 16:48:

100 x 100

THAT'S FVGGIN WEAK ASS, FVCKFACE!!!

who the hell uses images that small for avatars?!

loosen up the restraints on this b!tch a bit... damn.

oh and hi and stuffs.

Posted by gtron on Dec-14-2006 16:48:

oh sh!t... sigs are fvcked too!

Posted by denys envy on Dec-14-2006 16:48:

inb4daban.

Posted by tubularbills on Dec-14-2006 16:49:

inb4thestupid.

oh wait....

Posted by wienerschnitzel on Dec-14-2006 16:50:

this thread is as awesome as the 'christmas with kenny G' cd she's been playing all week

Posted by Omega_M on Dec-14-2006 16:50:

is that you vivid ?

Posted by KilldaDJ on Dec-14-2006 16:51:

wtflol?

Posted by stren on Dec-14-2006 16:51:

Re: 100 x 100

quote:
Originally posted by gtron
THAT'S FVGGIN WEAK ASS, FVCKFACE!!!

who the hell uses images that small for avatars?!

loosen up the restraints on this b!tch a bit... damn.

oh and hi and stuffs.

this forum is not about gigantic avatars or sigs

Posted by jonSun on Dec-14-2006 16:53:

lol wazzup Gtron

Posted by Frenchie on Dec-14-2006 16:54:

Inb4daswampban!

Posted by ZeJayMan on Dec-14-2006 16:54:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
lol wazzup Gtron

your sig wins my vote JonSun.

Posted by Lira on Dec-14-2006 16:55:

Posted by Frenchie on Dec-14-2006 16:58:

ummmm?

"...let this thread continue as a roll call"

Posted by DarkAngel on Dec-14-2006 16:58:

Que?

Posted by stren on Dec-14-2006 16:59:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
ummmm?

"...let this thread continue as a roll call"

i'm in

Posted by david.michael on Dec-14-2006 17:01:

Re: 100 x 100

Posted by _Nut_ on Dec-14-2006 17:04:

Re: Re: 100 x 100

quote:
Originally posted by stren
this forum is not about gigantic avatars or sigs

Just because you get pissy over sigs that are out of bounds does not qualify you for judgment.

Those were put into effect ages ago when internet bandwidth was much less. IMO setting should be changed and more should be allowed.

Your turn to counter.

Posted by Ivand on Dec-14-2006 17:06:

lol

Posted by david.michael on Dec-14-2006 17:11:

Has little to do with bandwidth, and much to do with people such as the original poster in this thread wanting to promote his homosexual agenda using unnecessary amounts of pixels. Some of us like to actually read the words on a semi-organized platform.

Posted by stren on Dec-14-2006 17:13:

Re: Re: Re: 100 x 100

quote:
Originally posted by _Nut_
Just because you get pissy over sigs that are out of bounds does not qualify you for judgment.

my judgement has nothing to do with the fact that there are restrictions. Maybe Swamper will change them someday , but i'm sure the number of users has something to do with it. I don't know about others, but i enjoy it if the sig is not bigger then the post, which rarely happens in this forum anyway

Posted by _Nut_ on Dec-14-2006 17:13:

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
Has little to do with bandwidth, and much to do with people such as the original poster in this thread wanting to promote his homosexual agenda using unnecessary amounts of pixels. Some of us like to actually read the words on a semi-organized platform.

There is a wonderful feature to not display sigs.

Here is your diploma for failing FAQ's.

Posted by david.michael on Dec-14-2006 17:15:

quote:
Originally posted by _Nut_
There is a wonderful feature to not display sigs.

Here is your diploma for failing FAQ's.

There is also a feature of not having to read the forums at all.

All things within reason.... removing all size restrictions would make people have page-long signatures, ruining it for the rest of the people who just want to put a link to their latest mix in their sig. I've seen it happen. It's dumb.

Edit- Was unaware that I could receive a diploma for failing something. Did you get your actual diploma?

Posted by _Nut_ on Dec-14-2006 17:21:

quote:
Originally posted by david.michael
There is also a feature of not having to read the forums at all.

All things within reason.... removing all size restrictions would make people have page-long signatures, ruining it for the rest of the people who just want to put a link to their latest mix in their sig. I've seen it happen. It's dumb.

Edit- Was unaware that I could receive a diploma for failing something. Did you get your actual diploma?

Did you read my post?

quote:
Originally posted by _Nut_
IMO setting should be changed and more should be allowed.

Where did I say they should be removed? Changed and more allowed does not mean no restrictions. Where are your analytical skills?

And yes, I have a diploma from my high school, one from college, and in the near future one for a graduate degree.

Posted by david.michael on Dec-14-2006 17:22:

What would you consider to be an acceptable size for an avatar or signature? What is the necessity for increasing these restrictions?

They just seem plenty forgiving to me.

Edit:

quote:
Changed and more allowed does not mean no restrictions.

Point being, they are unnecessary as-is, and already take up plenty of room... to what point does it leave the realm of either "fun" or "helpful" and just become bothersome?

Posted by EXTREMUM on Dec-14-2006 17:31:

100x100 is sufficient - quit bitching. This is a music forum, not an art gallery.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »