TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Does It Bother You? 1200/1210Mk2 Owners...
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by ZeJayMan on Jan-08-2007 01:04:

Does It Bother You? 1200/1210Mk2 Owners...

I'm talking about the pitch slider on the 1200/1210 Mk2 Technics turntables.

For those who don't know, on the Mk2 Turntable slightly "locks in", for lack of a better term, when set at 0%. When they released the Mk3 and Mk5 they solved this issue. The purpose of this was to remove the 'click' at the 0 point of the fader to improve the accuracy of the pitch fader.

What I'm asking is, basically to the 1210/1200 owners, do you find that the "click" hinders you enough to make you wish you had spent the extra dosh on the Mk3 or Mk5 or Mk5G, or is it something I really shouldn't worry about?

Cheers In Advance

J


Posted by TaylorR on Jan-08-2007 01:28:

lock doesn't bother me


Posted by razzi on Jan-08-2007 01:30:

more annoying than anything, especially on old mk2s when the pitch can vary quite alot around that little click. just have to pitch up or down a little more to avoid


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-08-2007 02:02:

never been an issue. if it slips around the 0 mark at all, i just speed the other tune up a tiny bit. problem solved.


Posted by tubby on Jan-08-2007 02:03:

gently shift the other deck 1/2% in either direction and the problem is solved. Sure it's be nice not to have to deal with it, but it's not problem I'd pay all that much to remove.


Posted by DannyO on Jan-08-2007 03:41:

Doesn't bother me, you just get used to it, I'd rather not have it, but I just do what has been said above, move the pitch on the other track.


Posted by Chris Allen on Jan-08-2007 04:44:

Never had a problem. Just move the other track around a bit to solve the issue as others mentioned.


Posted by i got big pants on Jan-08-2007 06:36:

the actual feel of the click bothers me...but other than that...nope


Posted by skot_e on Jan-08-2007 06:40:

The click itself doesn't do anything and can be removed - it's just a ball bearing sitting in a hole with a spring.
The variation that occurs around zero is due to the quartz lock. This can also be removed, tho I have not done it. I'm not sure if I really want to mess with the electronics that much - I'm still deciding. Apparently this fix will resolve your pet hate (second half of page):


http://www.deepattitude.com/turntable_modifications.htm


Posted by T-Soma on Jan-08-2007 07:17:

I set mine so that they are zeroed correctly. So the 0 lock does nothing.


Posted by skot_e on Jan-08-2007 08:18:

When I say variation, I mean touchy adjustment. Since my dex were new, they have had a quite inaccurate spot between -1/2 and +1/2 in that it is hard to spot it right, requiring the other deck to be moved (as previously stated above). The mod I linked to is supposed to make the transition around that point smoother meaning that the other deck need not be altered, but as I said I have not done it myself.


Posted by blacknoizybox on Jan-08-2007 08:36:

technics hehee *cough..T.120C..cough*


Posted by Jarvmeister on Jan-08-2007 11:42:

My opinion: What the hell were Technics thinking?!?!?!

Although it makes much less differemce, why did Pioneer decide to put a notch at 0% on the CDJ800 and leave it out on the CDJ1000? Odd behaviour.

Jarv


Posted by ZeJayMan on Jan-08-2007 15:21:

Thanks for all the replies. Keep em' coming.


Posted by djkoolaide on Jan-08-2007 15:35:

quote:
Originally posted by blacknoizybox
technics hehee *cough..T.120C..cough*


Piss off.


Posted by blacknoizybox on Jan-08-2007 18:54:

quote:
Originally posted by djkoolaide
Piss off.


do the clickedy click


Posted by skot_e on Jan-09-2007 06:01:

quote:
Originally posted by Jarvmeister
My opinion: What the hell were Technics thinking?!?!?!

Although it makes much less differemce, why did Pioneer decide to put a notch at 0% on the CDJ800 and leave it out on the CDJ1000? Odd behaviour.

Jarv


I can understand Technics early models since originally it was designed for a different use, but as the CDJ is strictly DJ minded, that is odd.


Posted by veezee on Jan-10-2007 09:23:

never play around the zero mark anyhow.. meh.

Jay


Posted by OMNIFEX on Jan-12-2007 16:05:

Not at all.

I'm not sure if you are complaining on the slider locking at zero, or the initial click heard once locked.

As skot_e pointed out, you can remove the ball bearing if it bothers you, but it will still quartz lock when it reaches zero.


Posted by nefardec on Jan-12-2007 17:24:

i used an mk2 and an mk3 and the mk2 fucking annoyed me because of that, yes


Posted by Rubenz on Jan-12-2007 21:52:

You can ajust the point of 0% pitch on a sl1200mk2 so that it�s at the same point as the quarts lock. This way it isn�t nescesary to remove the ball in the fader or to cut wires inside your tt etc.


Posted by undersound80 on Jan-13-2007 12:07:

doesnt make a difference. adapt. overcome.


Posted by ZeJayMan on Jan-14-2007 03:21:

Cheers for the replies once again.


Posted by jmix on Jan-21-2007 09:28:

I reckon you can just swap in a replacement pitch slider for the M3D into your MK2's


Posted by tintin11 on Jan-21-2007 21:30:

no bother at all...


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.