TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Fazul Abdullah Mohammed
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »

Fazul Abdullah Mohammed

DEAD

almost 10 years and he eats it runnin like a little bitch.

thanx Ethiopia. you get it. Ted Kennedy doesn't.

Re: Fazul Abdullah Mohammed

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo DEAD almost 10 years and he eats it runnin like a little bitch. thanx Ethiopia. you get it. Ted Kennedy doesn't.

Haha, he hid in shithole somalia, and still got capped!! US NAVY STYLE!!!

Another CIA asset killed?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Another CIA asset killed?

CIA asset?

quote:

Originally posted by Krypton CIA asset?

You know, like Bin Laden. Ofcourse, I'm not making a statement, rather posing a queston, that many here wouldn't even consider, as they're not exactly open minded. No implications about you in that statement though, so don't take it the wrong way .

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Another CIA asset killed?

lol prolly

quote:

Originally posted by jonSun lol prolly

That's probably the funniest part about neocons and others jumping with joy once they wack someone,

"Yes.... Yes! Yes!!!!!! We got 'em! We fucking got 'em! Fuck Yeah!!!"

Yeah, congratulations . You just killed an ex-employee/false-flag op participant who the intelligence agencies spent atleast a few hundred thosands dollars training in most likelyhood, your tax dollars. Now they spend 10 times that just to get rid of him... again... using your tax dollars, not to mention with great finesse (i.e. extreme incompetence).

EDIT: Reminds me a bit of wrestling fans (think WWF, or whatever it's called now). "Did you see that Tombstone piledriver?!?!! Wow!" LOL

Man, I wish Bill Hicks was still alive. He'd have the funniest material and the balls to deliver it in todays political climate. I miss Bill.

EDIT: So in memory of a great man and comedian:



And the funniest Texan ever

haha, burn in hell. I was in recruit training at
Parris Island when our embassies which are guarded
by U.S. Marines were blown up killing hundreds of
civilians. Can't forget when we got word of it.

LOL

quote:

Originally posted by DevilDogUSMC haha, burn in hell. I was in recruit training at Parris Island when our embassies which are guarded by U.S. Marines were blown up killing hundreds of civilians. Can't forget when we got word of it.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z That's probably the funniest part about neocons and others jumping with joy once they wack someone, "Yes.... Yes! Yes!!!!!! We got 'em! We fucking got 'em! Fuck Yeah!!!" Yeah, congratulations . You just killed an ex-employee/false-flag op participant who the intelligence agencies spent atleast a few hundred thosands dollars training in most likelyhood, your tax dollars. Now they spend 10 times that just to get rid of him... again... using your tax dollars, not to mention with great finesse (i.e. extreme incompetence). EDIT: Reminds me a bit of wrestling fans (think WWF, or whatever it's called now). "Did you see that Tombstone piledriver?!?!! Wow!" LOL

only shaolin could turn this into a debate about CIA assets

even if he was, i really dont see the relevance. a government that isnt all-powerful or all-knowing will, time to time, have to find assets to use for their ends. it doesn't mean they create these people. i mean seriously, how bad must the training be if all these people suddenly turn against the US?

it also doesnt mean that a former asset cant be today's enemy, which this fella clearly was.

also, in regards to bin laden (and correct me if im wrong) didnt the CIA training involve helping the muhajadeen (sp?) against the soviets? werent the soviets invading a sovereign nation without any provocation? how is aiding the people there against such an attack a crime?

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN only shaolin could turn this into a debate about CIA assets even if he was, i really dont see the relevance. a government that isnt all-powerful or all-knowing will, time to time, have to find assets to use for their ends. it doesn't mean they create these people. i mean seriously, how bad must the training be if all these people suddenly turn against the US? it also doesnt mean that a former asset cant be today's enemy, which this fella clearly was. also, in regards to bin laden (and correct me if im wrong) didnt the CIA training involve helping the muhajadeen (sp?) against the soviets? werent the soviets invading a sovereign nation without any provocation? how is aiding the people there against such an attack a crime?

Heh, that's the beauty of of my statement, or question, really, it potentially holds true eigther way .

quote:

Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN also, in regards to bin laden (and correct me if im wrong) didnt the CIA training involve helping the muhajadeen (sp?) against the soviets? werent the soviets invading a sovereign nation without any provocation? how is aiding the people there against such an attack a crime?

Doesn't that sound familiar .

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Doesn't that sound familiar .

i just KNEW you were gonna say something like that!

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Another CIA asset killed?

the guy's been on the FBI's most wanted list for this entire century (read 1/3 of your entire life) for killing over 200 Africans and wiping out our Embassies and this is the best you can come up with? staggering...and you call me brainwashed. step back from the internet for a while.

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo the guy's been on the FBI's most wanted list for this entire century (read 1/3 of your entire life) for killing over 200 Africans and wiping out our Embassies and this is the best you can come up with? staggering...and you call me brainwashed. step back from the internet for a while.

LOL. So's Bin Laden. I posed a question rather than make a statement. Apprarently you can't differentiate between the two. And if it took the form of a statement in your head, you're not very good at differentiating between generalizations and absolutes, and your cetainly don't have the logical framework necessary for effective application of it to a given situation. Putting words in other people's mouth, is that the best you can do? Or did your military training (aka brainwashing) really compromise your ability to think that much?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z I posed a question rather than make a statement. Apprarently you can't differentiate between the two. And if it took the form of a statement in your head, you're not very good at differentiating between generalizations and absolutes, and your cetainly don't have the logical framework necessary for effective application of it to a given situation.

what is this, the Jeopardy defence? you can't hold your own water from a simple interogative and now you want to pretend you're Alex Trebec? brilliant. way to not defend your own words.

hundreds of law enforcement officials from who knows how many different countries look for this asshole for the last 10 years and you can't even defend yourself from your own myopic ideals.

a historically, very Christian nation decides to pre-emptively invade their neihgbor and drive out Radical Muslims and you have nothing to say about it? thats funny. they turn over a rock in the Somalie desert and out scurries this prick after 10 years and you think youve got the world figured out because you have the internet?

Keep babbling Q, still waiting for a real response... actually, I'm not, because I've never seen one from you and I certainly don't expect one to magically come out of nowhere. Get this book, it might help you:



It's a good starting point. Let me know when you're ready for your next step.

EDIT: But you might want to learn how to read before you attempt that:

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Another CIA asset killed?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z You know, like Bin Laden. Ofcourse, I'm not making a statement, rather posing a queston, that many here wouldn't even consider, as they're not exactly open minded. No implications about you in that statement though, so don't take it the wrong way .

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo what is this, the Jeopardy defence? you can't hold your own water from a simple interogative and now you want to pretend you're Alex Trebec? brilliant. way to not defend your own words.

Or do you also have bad memory when it's convenient?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z still waiting for a real response...

to what? you thinking he was a CIA operative and it was a waste of taxpayer dollars and was an incompetent effort? i guess you are entitled to you opinion as lame and myopic as it is.

tell me i'm wrong but that was your response right?

and i've never watched wrestling, i just don't like terrorists.

^^ Do you really like embarrasing yourself that much? In that case, try a little harder why don't you.

Originally posted by shaolin_Z
Another CIA asset killed?

ok... where do you come up with this? So he's responsible
for hundreds of deaths and he should get a free pass because
you think somehow someway in the past at sometime he must
have been on the CIAs payroll...

Wait you won't understand it unless I do what you do and
add LOLs and smilies. LOL

^^ You don't like reading eigther do you? Don't be afraid, give it a try .

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z ^^ You don't like reading eigther do you? Don't be afraid, give it a try .

I don't see a link to an article by a respectable source
supporting that Fazul Abdullah Mohammed was a CIA assest
and thus should not be targeted for killing hundreds of
civilians...

quote:

Originally posted by DevilDogUSMC I don't see a link to an article by a respectable source supporting that Fazul Abdullah Mohammed was a CIA assest and thus should not be targeted for killing hundreds of civilians...

Apparently you didn't understand my previous post. If you're going to argue with someone, atleast base it on something they actually said, instead of something they didn't.

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Apparently you didn't understand my previous post. If you're going to argue with someone, atleast base it on something they actually said, instead of something they didn't.

So what has been your point in this thread? That he was
a CIA assest and thus shouldn't have been killed? He
wasn't a murderer? Our taxpaying money was spent on training
him? I don't understand what your problem is...

You posted about a comedian and a book. But what about the
death of this individual has you all butt hurt over?

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.