TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Flight ban for anti-Bush T-shirt
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by star-traveller on Jan-22-2007 10:54:

Flight ban for anti-Bush T-shirt

quote:
Flight ban for anti-Bush T-shirt

A passenger barred from a Qantas airlines flight for wearing a T-shirt depicting US President George Bush as a terrorist has threatened legal action.
Allen Jasson said he was sticking up for the principle of free speech by challenging the decision by the Australian flag carrier.

Mr Jasson was stopped as he was about to board the flight from Melbourne to London last Friday.

Qantas said the T-shirt had potential to offend other passengers.

The T-shift features an image of President George W Bush, along with the slogan "World's Number One Terrorist".

'Principle'

The 55-year-old computer specialist, who lives in London, had encountered difficulties with the same T-shirt on an earlier Qantas flight in December.

After clearing the international security checks at Melbourne Airport, he reportedly approached the gate manager to congratulate him on the company's new-found open-mindedness.

At that point, Mr Jasson was ordered to remove the T-shirt after being told it was a security threat and an item which might cause offence to other passengers.

He was offered the chance to board the flight wearing different clothing, but refused.

"I am not prepared to go without the t-shirt. I might forfeit the fare, but I have made up my mind that I would rather stand up for the principle of free speech," he told Australian media.

A Qantas spokesman defended the airline's decision, saying: "Whether made verbally or on a T-shirt, comments with the potential to offend other customers or threaten the security of a Qantas group aircraft will not be tolerated".


Flight ban for anti-Bush T-shirt

And depicting Muhamed as a stupid cartoon character CAN'T offend.
What a bunch of morons.


Posted by LazFX on Jan-22-2007 11:02:

No matter what he was wearing, the airline has the right to refuse service..... so no big deal, plus it did not happen in the US so whats your point??


Posted by Lilith on Jan-22-2007 12:50:

Don't have much love for airlines and anti-terrorism laws on airlines, but basically its their stuff and if you don't play by their weird rules you lump it.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Jan-22-2007 13:41:

Idiocy on airlines isn't tolerated.
Why not just have a picture of the burning towers while he's at it....


Posted by Lilith on Jan-22-2007 13:49:

Well he was obviously out to take the piss having done it once before, get his 15minutes of fame and get about as close as most 55year old computer science guys will get to being a 'rebel'.
Probably write about it in his 'blog' when he gets home and have other like minded nut jobs throwing their moral outrage in about how 'the man' stopped them from going into a night club with sneakers on once.


Posted by Fir3start3r on Jan-22-2007 13:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Well he was obviously out to take the piss having done it once before...


That's the part that got me, hence 'idiocy'...

...and you're probably right!
Must be hard living in the body of an old man when you're really a cool anti-social teen rebel.


Posted by Lilith on Jan-22-2007 14:04:

True, just buy a convertible when the willie stops working and stop trying to save the rest of us from weird airline policies.


Posted by star-traveller on Jan-22-2007 21:03:

I don't see you people defending the Freedom Of Speech here.
I recall seeing quite different opinions after Denmark's newspaper published Muhamed's cartoons.


Posted by MrSquirrel on Jan-22-2007 22:44:

Freedom of Speech has no real bearing on this. An airplane is, in effect, a private club. The owners of that plane have the right to deny anyone for just about any reason they want. No matter how much people don't like it.

As a customer of an airline, you are agreeing to follow their rules. When I was young, you could not wear a t-shirt at all on most airlines. Most airlines have loosened their dress codes for paying customers.

MrS


Posted by star-traveller on Jan-22-2007 22:57:

Hey, those 'private clubs' operates in a Democratic-like country, so they must obey its rules. If Australia allows people to express them self freely, they DON'T HAVE ANY RIGHT to forbid it.

Actially, I'm not suprised to see that kind of reaction at all.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jan-22-2007 23:02:

quote:
Originally posted by star-traveller
I don't see you people defending the Freedom Of Speech here.
I recall seeing quite different opinions after Denmark's newspaper published Muhamed's cartoons.


agreed...


Posted by Magnetonium on Jan-22-2007 23:05:



EDIT: Sadly, the airline can do things like that, its their "private club", as some say. They can consider that a "threat" to security. Following the 9/11 attacks I've heard of funnier things people got kicked out of airplanes for.

All I can recommend is never use that airline again. And tell the guy to go around with his story. Maybe the airline will stop being political, and start putting customers in priority view. Airlines for good part are known for shitty service, and poor treatment, especially since 9/11.


Posted by Sunsnail on Jan-23-2007 00:05:

Nothing surprising here. It's the same as a fancy restaurant enforcing dress code. Not allowing you into a fancy restaurant because of your dress would not be a violation of free speech.

quote:
Originally posted by Magnetonium


Maybe the airline will stop being political, and start putting customers in priority view.


That's what they're doing in the situation.


Posted by tubby on Jan-23-2007 00:50:

i found it quite funny seeing the OP mis-spell moron

you can call him an idiot for pushing the point by wearing a shirt he knew would cause trouble, but that was the whole purpose. To a great many people bush is a terrorist, how is that political statement a threat to security of the plane?
On it's own this issue is not a big deal, but with people being removed from planes for daring to speak in non-english languages, or looking non-anglo, this is all part of a dangerous precedent.
As for airlines being a law unto themselves, that's just rubbish. They do have a duty of care in regards to security, and we are accepting a lower level of freedom in many ways to achieve this, but they are not exempt from the laws of society.


Posted by Magnetonium on Jan-23-2007 01:44:

quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
Nothing surprising here. It's the same as a fancy restaurant enforcing dress code. Not allowing you into a fancy restaurant because you of your dress would not be a violation of free speech.



That's what they're doing in the situation.


They do let others wear shirts like "I hate hippies", or "Disco Sucks", for example, which will offend some people. But they do single out political views.


Posted by Lilith on Jan-23-2007 02:16:

Dozens of cases of people being denied flights due to something offensive and non-political on a tshirt, they do it all the time. Even for things like a 'Meet the Fockers' tshirt which was from the movie, heavy metal shirts, satirical tshirts with sexual innuendo and swearing.

They don't like your tshirt, you dont fly.


Posted by Magnetonium on Jan-23-2007 02:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Dozens of cases of people being denied flights due to something offensive and non-political on a tshirt, they do it all the time. Even for things like a 'Meet the Fockers' tshirt which was from the movie, heavy metal shirts, satirical tshirts with sexual innuendo and swearing.

They don't like your tshirt, you dont fly.


Dam ... if I wear all red they might think I'm a communist and kick me off the flight. EVERYONE, wear all white or black and smile at all times!!!


Posted by Q5echo on Jan-23-2007 03:21:

quote:
Originally posted by star-traveller
I don't see you people defending the Freedom Of Speech here.


some of us realize freedom of speech is irrelavent here. there is no 1st Amendment in an airport or airplane no matter what country youre in.

quote:
I recall seeing quite different opinions after Denmark's newspaper published Muhamed's cartoons.


you're waaayy generalizing to fit your flawed free speech argument.

apples and oranges. when was the last time someone was killed with a newspaper?


Posted by Fir3start3r on Jan-23-2007 03:40:

quote:
Originally posted by star-traveller
I don't see you people defending the Freedom Of Speech here.
I recall seeing quite different opinions after Denmark's newspaper published Muhamed's cartoons.


Really?
Try saying, "Hi Jack" or joke about a bomb and see where your Freedom of Speech gets you.
You conveniently forget that with freedom comes responsibility..


Posted by Zild on Jan-23-2007 03:58:

Sure it is stupid but they're a business and they have the right to refuse their services. It has nothing to do with the first amendment and the right of free speech.


Posted by MrSquirrel on Jan-23-2007 04:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
some of us realize freedom of speech is irrelavent here. there is no 1st Amendment in an airport or airplane no matter what country youre in.


This marks one of the few times in human history where I and Q have ever agreed on anything.

MrS


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jan-23-2007 04:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Really?
Try saying, "Hi Jack" or joke about a bomb and see where your Freedom of Speech gets you.
You conveniently forget that with freedom comes responsibility..


So...

What exactly does freedom mean?

Anyone know?


Posted by Lilith on Jan-23-2007 05:04:

quote:
Originally posted by Zild
Sure it is stupid but they're a business and they have the right to refuse their services. It has nothing to do with the first amendment and the right of free speech.


Also the fact it's fairly much endemic in all airlines all over the world and besides, who wants to spend 20+ hours locked in a plane with complete tossers out to irritate people?
Theres a number of psychological reasons why they don't want you being openly colourful about your opinions and letting everyone else know about it, because after 20hours, bored, probably sick of being locked up with strangers you don't know it's going to chafe on someones nerves and then it's going to turn into a circus.

Minds wander, tempers fray and people get pissed off at being stuck there and they're not going to pull over and kick someone out halfway through for being irritating or the source of irritation for anyone else. It might not even be deliberate, it might even be meant in jest but after spending enough time with them fairly much anything will set people off.
Just watch the movies
Listen to music
Eat the horrible food
Shut your mouth
Dont bother anyone else who doesnt want any interaction with you
Keep your opinion to yourself

I've probably got enough frequent flyer points to put my grandkids into orbit and I don't lose my temper too easily. But if you stuck me in a seat for a London to Sydney flight next to someone who's 55 years old wearing a tshirt a kid would wear, even I'm liable to shank him with a emryboard around the 16-18hr mark just on the principle of it


Posted by shaolin_Z on Jan-23-2007 05:49:

I can't believe everyone here's actually defending this crap. Pathetic.


Posted by shaolin_Z on Jan-23-2007 05:58:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
So...

What exactly does freedom mean?

Anyone know?


Apparently not.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.