TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- worse than the loudness war..
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by mysticalninja on Feb-22-2007 09:26:

worse than the loudness war..

is the fucking war over filling up every last inch of headroom and space in a mix. jesus christ shit has so much percussion and whitenoise everyone tries to have no open space in their mix what so ever. ppl insist on filling every little inch of dead space up with shakers and crap! i dunno... just sounds too busy to me now days not enough atmosphere. i miss the simpler more minimal trance days. its really harder to make trance sound good with less...


Posted by camsr on Feb-22-2007 09:50:

Why do you think the virus is so popular? IT sounds like a wall of noise ffs


Posted by R.j. on Feb-22-2007 09:58:

quote:
Originally posted by camsr
Why do you think the virus is so popular? IT sounds like a wall of noise ffs


hah....


Posted by KilldaDJ on Feb-22-2007 11:19:

personally i dont bother filling up the dead space in my mix with shit i dont need (shakers wtf?), i use that space as wiggle room for the existing instruments/synths within the mix (room for reverb and such)


Posted by mysticalninja on Feb-22-2007 12:27:

yes and i admire and been a fan of your work for awhile.. since i heard your alice deejay remix lol


Posted by Storyteller on Feb-22-2007 13:41:

not everybody is a bad-ass professional....


Posted by Chronosis on Feb-22-2007 14:48:

quote:
Originally posted by KilldaDJ
(shakers wtf?)


Shakers are the best! I use them in every track.


Posted by Subtle on Feb-22-2007 17:40:

i see your point.

In the older days the tracks didnt have that much layers. and still sounds better than alot of tracks these day.. a simple sound can create just as much depth as 10 multilayered sounds all over.


Posted by Chronosis on Feb-22-2007 19:12:

Imo the problem with these days tracks is that people try to make every element dominant. This way the listeners focus is forced to spread on everything and one can't enjoy single beautiful things as much.

...still there's always room for shakers


Posted by Limit on Feb-22-2007 20:31:

ok now I'm gonna make a track with just shakers. LOL


Posted by thoughtlessjex on Feb-22-2007 20:41:

Shakers:

They're what Trance is all about.


Posted by daeus on Feb-22-2007 21:30:

Gotta Love those Meraccas percussion.

Just like in drum and bass when the triangle comes in, Just imagine Debt coming out with a triangle live on stage as he MC's.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Feb-22-2007 22:11:

when all else fails, add more cowbell.


Posted by DigiNut on Feb-22-2007 23:27:

Best thing to do is start with white noise at 0 dB and put a limiter on the master.


Posted by B_man on Feb-23-2007 01:43:

Shakers and Cowbells + triangles

Now I need some Farmer Brown Samples... gyyyahahahaaaa!

I'm feeling like I'm gonna produce a #1 hit with this diabolic combination.


Posted by Vizay on Feb-23-2007 03:16:

I'd say that this deffo is connected to the whole "loudness war".

As usual the general opinion seem to be that louder = better and what could be better for loudness than shitloads of layered instruments.

Even though I really hate that kind of thinking and reasoning I find myself quite often in the very same trap, filling up my headroom more and more.

I must say that in the end there's nothing as good as a simple track with nice dynamics!


Posted by camsr on Feb-23-2007 04:57:

quote:
Originally posted by DigiNut
Best thing to do is start with white noise at 0 dB and put a limiter on the master.


Not a bad idea actually


Posted by Allied Nations on Feb-23-2007 06:10:

I just put shakers in a track


Posted by Nemesis44 on Feb-23-2007 14:38:

If you listen to the best tracks (in my opinion) they still have that ability to breathe a little.

I find that may of the tracks that pile up on various frequencies actually lake melody and components that stick in your mind. In other words, you forget about the track as soon as you have heard it.

If you have a strong melody then you don't need to go apeshit with the shakers, cowbells or anything else.

In this particular instance we can actully take the lead from a lot of rock bands as they actually only need bass, two guitars, drums and a vocalist. Not a big fan of rock but you can always hear a well written track.

Sometimes less is definately more.

Cheers
Nem


Posted by flutlicht junky on Feb-23-2007 16:51:

shakers = MORE ANALOG

Its the modern way


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Feb-23-2007 22:53:

That is one temptation.

Can't do anything interesting with just a few elements? Then add more and everything will be too busy for most people to notice how boring the individual elements are.

Stupid.


Posted by zodiac9 on Feb-24-2007 00:30:

quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44

If you have a strong melody then you don't need to go apeshit with the shakers, cowbells or anything else.

In this particular instance we can actully take the lead from a lot of rock bands as they actually only need bass, two guitars, drums and a vocalist. Not a big fan of rock but you can always hear a well written track.


I come from the rock and metal world, so it seemed odd to me how much layering is expected in Trance and other forms of EDM. I agree, if you have a good melody, you don't need to have to have a ton of things going on. Progressive Trance tends to have less melodies, or no real melody line at all, so that is made up for by adding a lot of percussion lines and FX, ect. Some of it sounds good, some of it is pretty sterile and boring.

I use shakers and tambourines a lot, and I'm always experimenting with new percussion sounds. I try not to overdo it though, and my tracks always have strong melody lines. Nonetheless, I gave in to the pressure of trying to fill every space of my tracks. This is mainly due to feedback I've gotten from other producers, so I assumed it was expected. I guess that's just the way it is nowadays. DJs and the average listener seem to expect it too.

I switched over to Progressive House, I think out of rebellion. Prog House seems to be more about the music, and doesn't rely so much on percussion layering and having a ton of things going on at once. It's more pure musically, much like the way Trance used to be.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Feb-24-2007 01:39:

quote:
Originally posted by Nemesis44
In this particular instance we can actully take the lead from a lot of rock bands as they actually only need bass, two guitars, drums and a vocalist. Not a big fan of rock but you can always hear a well written track.


Modern rock bands fill up every inch of headroom, AND overcompress for loudness.

It's all about the "wall of sound".


Posted by Vizay on Feb-24-2007 23:41:

Well I guess it's not far from the truth to say that producing EDM theese days have become more usual since the access to software is so wide (with piracy and all that stuff).

Everyone want to do it but not everyone is equally suited for it. It takes a good ammount of creativeness to create a really good and mindblowing melody but in order to create something quite regular all you need is to listen to others work, copy and alter and then fill up the rest of the track with sound in order to mask that the rest of the track is actually quite mediocre.

Call me cynical but it's true for quite many productions...


Posted by blacknoizybox on Feb-25-2007 08:03:

Re: worse than the loudness war..

quote:
Originally posted by mysticalninja
is the fucking war over filling up every last inch of headroom and space in a mix. jesus christ shit has so much percussion and whitenoise everyone tries to have no open space in their mix what so ever. ppl insist on filling every little inch of dead space up with shakers and crap! i dunno... just sounds too busy to me now days not enough atmosphere. i miss the simpler more minimal trance days. its really harder to make trance sound good with less...



AGREED!!!

more to that I can say that this willing to fill up 101% of headroom makes me feel like one is trying to make it sound more "progressive" opposing to "ordinary" trance/house etc. which I personally find sad because for me music has gone way down qualitywise (corpared to 2003 and earlier)


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.