TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Production Studio
-- Open Vs. Closed For Mixing/Monitoring?
Open Vs. Closed For Mixing/Monitoring?
So I've researched headphones for the purpose of monitoring/mixing and there's a few things I'm not clear on:
-Which is better for mixing and monitoring your productions, closed or open ear? Because i was under the impression closed are meant for recording and open for mixing.
-The MDR-7506 and V-6 are overly "hot"?
-The HD280s have exaggerated bass?
-Anyone have input on the AKG 240s? I haven't been able to find much critique on them.
i saw someone answer this with Wikipedia the other day... thought it was better said than i could put it.
| quote: |
Open Open headphones (sometimes marketed as "open air" headphones) have an open grille on the back of the driver, exposing the driver to the outside, and allowing the soundwaves to propagate away from the ear freely. This backing type does not isolate the listener from outside sounds; in addition, sound through open headphones can be easily heard by others in the vicinity of the user (not always a desirable quality). They, however, usually have less sound distortion (due to the lack of resonance) and tighter controlled sound reproduction. Most audiophile-quality headphones, such as the AKG K-501, Grado GS1000, Sennheiser HD 650, Koss UR-5, are open headphones. Closed headphones have a sealed backing, which attenuates soundwaves propagating in the direction away from the ear. As a result, listeners away from the headphones cannot hear the produced sound easily. In addition, sound from outside is attenuated by the sealed backing, providing a level of isolation to the listener (typically a 10 dB decrease in outside sounds). A sealed chamber generally has the added negative effect of distorting sound in certain instances and providing "boomier", less controlled bass, making them lower in price and high-end quality than open headphones. |
open
I've got the AKG K271S and they are superb. They're closed.
Open is best.
However, are you sitting right next to a noisy computer/sibling? :P
You need to take environment into account too.
Re: Open Vs. Closed For Mixing/Monitoring?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by cocaine white -Anyone have input on the AKG 270s? I haven't been able to find much critique on them. |
Well based on what I'd read and you recommendations I just ordered a pair of k240s's for $99. thanks a lot guys 
Ditto on the AKGs. They're semi-open and are quite good for that purpose. There's no comparison at all to the HD280 or Sony MDR - those are both fine, but they're DJ headphones, not production cans.
P.S. Where on earth did you find them for $99?
They're sold by some third-party vendor via amazon, i don't remember who, and by zzounds for i think 110.
I say open.
I love how people say "HD-25 are great hp's for mixing" and then you tell them that they are sealed and not suitable so they show you that on the box it says "studio headphones" or something like that... hahaha... I always laugh at them...
It says "For Professional Monitoring", and being that their sound isolation is fantastic I think that's spot on. The HD25s are quite obviously designed for DJ monitoring though, and not flat sound reproduction.
9 times out of 10 theres at least one person on the bus in to College Green Dublin who is listening to their iPod using open backed headphones.
You can here the sound of Coldplay - Clocks from the other end of the bus. 
had a set of senheiser open cups for about 4 years and do the job pretty well.
I bet people on the bus hate you though. 
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.