TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Montreal
-- The Truth


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 19:29:

The Truth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSZG...related&search=

wow this comes from FOX news


Posted by Alex on Mar-25-2007 20:05:

................

Just cause one reporter interviewed one guy? That does not mean it's 100% true.


Posted by oldschool420 on Mar-25-2007 20:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Alex
................

Just cause one reporter interviewed one guy? That does not mean it's 100% true.


Especially coming from fox news. lol


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 20:32:

FOX news is supposed to be with the administration thats my point they are bias for the administration and if this guy was there and saw it with his own eyes on 9/11 why would he lie that he did see what he saw? doesnt make sense.


Posted by Alex on Mar-25-2007 20:45:

People lie all the time for publicity, some people even make their careers because of it.


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 20:51:

Do you really believe that this guy was going for publicity hours after the supposed plane crashed? His country was attacked but this guy was going for publicity come on man give me a break.


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 20:52:

Doesnt even look like theres a lot of people working on that plane crash site usually a big plane like that you would have tons of people recovering pieces and dead bodies? Am I wrong whats wrong with this picture...?


Posted by Alex on Mar-25-2007 21:11:

His country was attacked yet he was convinced it wasnt, hours after it was?

Contradictions don't exist.


Posted by yankeeBaby on Mar-25-2007 21:11:

Well even if, per se, there was "No plane crash" there.....I saw with my own eyes two planes run into the towers, and I saw people jumping out of buildings. Now that is the truth.


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 21:30:

OK so why would they lie about the other plane crash?


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 21:32:

Alex you re not making sense. The guy is interviewed on Fox news hours after the supposed plane crashed, the guy obvioulsy know by now that the planes hit the towers and according to authorities this was another plane that crashed, so why would he lie in those cirumstances? Fame?
I really dont think that Fame got to this guys head at that point in time.


Posted by Alex on Mar-25-2007 23:07:

I dunno why, if we're working under the assumption it was for personal gain...

Then I think you have way more faith in humanity than I do, since not so long after the towers collapsed there were scavengers stealing computer keyboards and what not.


Also, if it was made to look like a plane crash, but it wasnt actually a plane crash, then what's the big deal? The government was enhancing there cause for retaliation by making the crime of the day seem more heinous. If no plane actually crashed, then no people actually got hurt in that incident so we should all be grateful no?

There were conspiracies that Churchill knew Pearl Harbor was going to happen and didnt alert the US gov. because he knew it would rally them to the Allied cause, governments do these kinds of things man, or at least there are enough rumors to make it seem like they do. That being said though I cant very well believe an incident that was so widely publicized didnt actually happen just because one photographer said it didnt and because in a 1:00 long youtube video we didnt see authorities carrying dead bodies away from the scene.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Mar-25-2007 23:11:

If you believe anything that comes from FOX News, there is a bridge in Brooklyn i can sell you real cheap


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 23:15:

No I believe that the US government knew that this was going to happen but they just let it happen so that they have carte blanche on everything after.

ANF like I said in my previous reply this is FOX news so Im surprised that this got on air since they are very well known to defend 9/11 and everything related to conspiracy to it is shunned by FOX news.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Mar-25-2007 23:22:

you have no idea what you are talking about...Fox News is the national enquirer of TV. Do you know how many times they hyave been forced to retract stories for putting them on the air with absolutly no proof or facts to back up the story?What a joke.


Posted by DarV on Mar-25-2007 23:27:

This isnt a retraction this is a witness. This guy is describing what he saw how is that relevant to the stories that have been retracted. He is describing what he saw and if you look at those ambulances its not like they are carrying anything. He said it a big hole, so I wonder where the plane parts are.

I know FOX isnt a real news cast, they are vehement defenders of this administration its all so clear, but never the less the way hes describing it doesnt sound like a plance crash. Thats the point im trying to make.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Mar-25-2007 23:52:

a witness is sometimes only as credible as the medium he chooses to use to speak

Whats next....Is fox going to drag out the Protocols of The elders Of zion


Posted by DarV on Mar-26-2007 02:14:

So according to you this person would have been more credible on cbc or bbc.


Posted by Alex on Mar-26-2007 02:30:

Usually what makes something credible or significant is when multiple news agencies decide to take notice.


Posted by Tag on Mar-26-2007 05:23:

Since when has anything on YouTube been credible?


Posted by DarV on Mar-26-2007 05:53:

Are we talking about news credible or fact credible. Because if the news wants or not to report it doesnt make it less credible. Its up to the news media to report it if they dont report it, does that make it less credible even though that certain event happened.

Alex I dont understand what you re saying.
You re saying if other news media starts reporting on the same event then it becomes credible?
How does that work, usually if its fact credible or if witnesses reported something do you still need to media to report on that to make it credible.


Posted by Alex on Mar-26-2007 06:01:

Of course you dont need the media to make it credible, 1+1= a window despite whatever any news agency may say.

BUT

in regards to an event so highly analyzed, scrutinized and so heavily written about and talked about for 1 reported to interview 1 photographer and for someone like you to post a 1 minute long youtube video of this... AND NO OTHER Media/articles/photos/proof to support your statement, I cant very well believe you over Reuters/BBC/CBC/CNN/CBS/MSNBC/CTV that all tell me a plane crashed in that field.

Not to mention the people they interviewed that said they saw a plane flying very low over a highway and then vanishing all together, that testimony was made public the same day (sept 11) as well.

Also the testimony of the family members of 1 or more of the people on board that plane that allegedly were contacted by their loved ones right before the plane went down.



Of course there ALWAYS is the chance that it's all a big gov. conspiracy, I admit that, I actually do, but so far the evidence is stacked in the favor of the plane crashing.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.