TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- why do dj's

why do dj's

why do djs put there faces on there album covers i thought its supposed to be about the music and not them?


like that new deep dish global underground the fuck is up with that cover?

Image sells. Most mainstream DJs are no different than pop-stars.

well is this the shortest topic ever question answered

thnx for starting such an intriguing and deep thread...

man i've always wondered the same thing...in fact i think about it all the time, i care so much. damn. thnx again. thnx.thnx dude.

"i'm hot cuz i'm fly, you aint cuz you not"

-MIMS

quote:

Originally posted by sleepydragon well is this the shortest topic ever question answered

And the shortest Spirit5 reply too!


But, yeah. That's about it, really. Marketing has shown folks are quicker to buy a disc if the DJ is the selling point, so might as well stick his mug on there to make sure we know who's the wo/man behind the decks/computer consule.

quote:

Originally posted by Sykonee And the shortest Spirit5 reply too!

Haha there's no need for me to always go on tangents because I don't need to explain myself/defend myself with something like this. It's pretty self explanatory. Usually threads that revolve around people trying to define what trance is and isn't and ones where Ishkur is usually involved. Hate it when he gets into his "you f**king piece of shit, you listen to tepid crap, it's NOT trance, it's bullshit!" rant..when he doesn't even know what you exactly listen to or trying to say (he just knows it's not what he likes/agrees with). I've learned not to respond when he says those kinds of things or carry on the debate/argument/flame war. They are usually lost causes, no matter how much I lay it out there (as simply as I can).

quote:

Originally posted by Sykonee And the shortest Spirit5 reply too!

Actually, his post was so long that it wrapped around the earth twice. You're only seeing the last line of it.

The reason I make long replies usually (not always) is because like I said, I try to defend myself and what I think, believe etc. I don't do it because I like to type long ass replies for the fun of it. Haha some people just don't like to be called a dumb-ass piece of shit who listens to crap music and whatever else, or for someone to mis-interpret or skew what I am saying (like straw-manning). Literally, people on here disect things I say. The whole post might be fine but one little thing I say often times gets blown out of porportion. And I sometimes get judged by people who've never really "talked to me", or even attempt to understand what I am saying or where I am coming from. It's not that I think people need to agree with me, it's usually the way that the person responds to what I am saying that irks me.

quote:

Originally posted by Spirit5 The reason I make long replies usually (not always) is because like I said, I try to defend myself and what I think, believe etc. I don't do it because I like to type long ass replies for the fun of it. Haha some people just don't like to be called a dumb-ass piece of shit who listens to crap music and whatever else, or for someone to mis-interpret or skew what I am saying (like straw-manning). Literally, people on here disect things I say. The whole post might be fine but one little thing I say often times gets blown out of porportion. And I sometimes get judged by people who've never really "talked to me", or even attempt to understand what I am saying or where I am coming from. It's not that I think people need to agree with me, it's usually the way that the person responds to what I am saying that irks me.

I've probaby said this before but I think people will understand your points and what you think much easier if you keep your posts shorter. That is a very basic rule here in every school in Sweden. The teacher or lecturers often gives a lower grade at an essay/exam if the answer is too long and doesn't contain much substance. I dunno about America but that should be a basic rule over there as well.

quote:

Originally posted by RebeL9 I've probaby said this before but I think people will understand your points and what you think much easier if you keep your posts shorter. That is a very basic rule here in every school in Sweden. The teacher or lecturers often gives a lower grade at an essay/exam if the answer is too long and doesn't contain much substance. I dunno about America but that should be a basic rule over there as well.

It was over here too. When we had to do an essay of say, 1000 words, we'd get points taken off for every 50 words over.

quote:

Originally posted by Project-K It was over here too. When we had to do an essay of say, 1000 words, we'd get points taken off for every 50 words over.

if americans knew how good Canada was, everyone would apply for citizenship there

quote:

Originally posted by RebeL9 I've probaby said this before but I think people will understand your points and what you think much easier if you keep your posts shorter. That is a very basic rule here in every school in Sweden. The teacher or lecturers often gives a lower grade at an essay/exam if the answer is too long and doesn't contain much substance. I dunno about America but that should be a basic rule over there as well.

Well not really. In America, it depends on the teacher and the assignment. I've had some teachers who wanted things really short and to the point, others who've not said anything to me about writing or doing more than expected. And I will go "to the point" however I think it's kind of frusturating, especially on here, when people disect things I say or mis-interpet what I say (not even attempt to at least understand my point of view) rather judge it, judge me, or like I said..disect something. Which kind of throws the whole thing off.

It's like I try to often find a middle ground in debates (like the on-going definition of "trance" debate) but I don't know if people on here even attempt to understand what I am saying and doing. I'm just the type of person that genuinely (not always) tries to take a middle ground approach (give me any issue and I can work to find a solution that could please both sides), and I agree that sometimes I can be a little dogmatic, or preachy about it. But i've stopped that largely..as best as I can. I will admit that I have trouble in real life getting to my points as well so maybe it's just the way I am, but it's also a defense mechanism.

See I don't like psy, no matter how hard i've tried to get into it, but I see why some people like it. And I understand the older trance as having a more hypnotic quality to it, but I find a middle ground and say that the newer trance is equally "trance" but maybe not as hypnotic sounding. That the term trance does mean more than just hypnotic states (it also means ecstatic states), and that there is plenty of music that isn't labeled "trance" that is hypnotic. So that's one way in which i've tried to reach a middle ground, I guess I don't feel I get respect for doing that (and I don't disrespect others). I am not debating this thing again, I am just using it as an example.

quote:

Originally posted by Spirit5 Well not really. In America, it depends on the teacher and the assignment. I've had some teachers who wanted things really short and to the point, others who've not said anything to me about writing or doing more than expected. And I will go "to the point" however I think it's kind of frusturating, especially on here, when people disect things I say or mis-interpet what I say (not even attempt to at least understand my point of view) rather judge it, judge me, or like I said..disect something. Which kind of throws the whole thing off.

The teachers who said nothing probably didn't do their job. That's for sure.

quote:

Originally posted by RebeL9 The teachers who said nothing probably didn't do their job. That's for sure.

Not true. Some feel that it's better to have something lengthier and more comprehensive than something so short that you don't go into detail..like on an essay. It depends on the teacher like I said, and the class. An english teacher may want you to make an essay longer, but say a science teacher may not. No english teacher (except maybe one) has told me to write shorter. But i've had science teachers tell me that (and my current one did for a paper I did). In science (or math) you either get it, or you don't, and the teacher can tell. English (or whatever is equivalent of a writing/literature class in Sweden) usually requires something more comprehensive than one or two sentences. Most English tests I had in High School were essay tests (minimum of a page) and or papers (minimum usuall was 3 pagers double spaced), not short answer or multiple choice (except maybe on a quiz).

quote:

Originally posted by Spirit5 Not true. Some feel that it's better to have something lengthier and more comprehensive than something so short that you don't go into detail..like on an essay. It depends on the teacher like I said, and the class. An english teacher may want you to make an essay longer, but say a science teacher may not.

you probably misunderstood my earlier post. I never said that the teacher wanted short essays. BUT every teacher I've came across, and others here can probably back this up themselves, prefers shorter texts with more substance rather than having long texts with little substance or which isn't giving much.
Every time I've written essays, and I've written tons of them during the last 5 years at the uni, the lecturer have often given comments such as "you could probably shorten this down and make it more comprehensive". Of course essays become longer at a higher level. But that still doesn't count in here since the higher you reach the more narrow is the subject and the more pressure is it on the writer to write with good analasys.

Jesus, lol at the progression of Spirit5 posts in this thread

quote:

Originally posted by RebeL9 you probably misunderstood my earlier post. I never said that the teacher wanted short essays. BUT every teacher I've came across, and others here can probably back this up themselves, prefers shorter texts with more substance rather than having long texts with little substance or which isn't giving much.

And that's true, esp with written essay-tests when you have a short period of time. You either get it, like I said, or you don't. In literature and papers, it's not quite the same. And I guess I am so used to writing papers vs. in class essay tests, and I've had more tests that were multiple choice vs. short answer or essay, that I am just used to writing more. And perhaps cause I don't talk to many people in real life (most of my social life outside of school and work has been on the net, esp in college) so I kind of use it as a means of communication. And this place has been literally the only place I could find people into the same type of music i'm into. Know coming in here, there will be someone i'll have something in common with. But that's it I have to say. This has become totally off topic.

Psytrance has some of the best album art

quote:

Originally posted by RebeL9 I've probaby said this before but I think people will understand your points and what you think much easier if you keep your posts shorter. That is a very basic rule here in every school in Sweden. The teacher or lecturers often gives a lower grade at an essay/exam if the answer is too long and doesn't contain much substance. I dunno about America but that should be a basic rule over there as well.

Here it's long useless answer that get rewarded. Effort is needed not talent.

quote:

Originally posted by Glassball Psytrance has some of the best album art

I guess something about the genre has to be interesting...

well djs to me are like rockstars, i really don't mind them showing their face sinse thats not why i would be buying an album, but at the same time one of the reasons i love daft is because they know that their faces are not important but their music is.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.