TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- 28 weeks later
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »


Posted by nchs09 on Apr-10-2007 18:22:

28 weeks later

i really liked 28 days later, perhaps the lsat scary, thriller i saw

if there is such a movie genera as thirrler/scary

anyhow thisone i dunno, looks good but im not shure. what are your thoughts on it? im def gonna go see it


Posted by Frenchie on Apr-10-2007 18:26:

Um..thrillers are supposed to be scary so I don't think you 'd call it "thriller/scary"

And wow.. 28 days later came out 5 years ago...


Posted by Marc Summers on Apr-10-2007 18:27:

Re: 28 weeks later

quote:
Originally posted by nchs09
i really liked 28 days later, perhaps the lsat scary, thriller i saw

if there is such a movie genera as thirrler/scary

anyhow thisone i dunno, looks good but im not shure. what are your thoughts on it? im def gonna go see it


I liked this very much. Zombie movies kick ass. And these zombies ran around like Olympic athletes, you don't fuck around with that. They weren't zombies though, right? Just a virus that made them crazy, yes?

And wtf? Robert Carlyle? No thanks. I'll see it, but he better not ruin the fucking movie.


Posted by nchs09 on Apr-10-2007 18:30:

i guess its a thriller only. and i dunno about directors so i dunno what else he has done, but i know im exited about this

ya i think it was a virus. i like how the kid is rocking the real madrid shirt... he clearly wont die or lose


Posted by Boomer187 on Apr-10-2007 18:34:

Isn't this that sandra bullock rehab movie?


Posted by Frenchie on Apr-10-2007 18:40:

Where were you 5 years ago when it came out?


Posted by nchs09 on Apr-10-2007 18:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Frenchie
Where were you 5 years ago when it came out?
in the movie theater watching it


Posted by Trancefxs on Apr-10-2007 19:26:

I guess the director of 28 days later is most known to the large public for Trainspotting, but he is not anymore the director of this sequel and this is usually not a really good sign.


Posted by Yan on Apr-10-2007 19:32:

quote:
Originally posted by nchs09
in the movie theater watching it


Same here.

Great flick.

I felt really bad for the dad, though.


Posted by jonSun on Apr-10-2007 19:32:

Loved the first one. I really wanna see this.


Posted by Saka on Apr-10-2007 20:49:

Love the first one, although Alex Garland didn't write this sequel and Danny Boyle isn't directing it. Therefore, since the original ties have been cut, the advertisers are trying desperately to make it seem like it's the same people responsible by saying "from the producer's of 28 days later", even though this movie could end up very different indeed.

The trailer makes it look good, but i think the reason the original was so brilliant was solely because of Garland's script, without which, it would've been just another zombie movie. And that's what worries me about this one.

I'll still go watch like...


Posted by denys envy on Apr-10-2007 23:59:

damn... i was gonna use that movie title for my script about genital warts...


Posted by Dj O'Callaghan on Apr-11-2007 08:46:

I haven't seen this yet but I liked 28 days later. I like how everywhere is abandoned and he walks around central London, and how the soldiers lured anyone who survived into a false sense of security.

quote:
I liked this very much. Zombie movies kick ass. And these zombies ran around like Olympic athletes, you don't fuck around with that. They weren't zombies though, right? Just a virus that made them crazy, yes?


The rage virus or something along them lines. It took something like a minute to 30 seconds I remember for the virus to totally over run a human so it spread like wildfire. Them things could give Carl Lewis a run for his money.

quote:
I felt really bad for the dad, though.


He was well unlucky, if it wasn't for them crows.


Posted by trewqy on Apr-11-2007 14:02:

28 days later was just a classic. It was so well directed and it showed how england can be so beautiful if there werent anyone around.

The whole scene where they were travelling to Manchester and looking and the horses and brian eno's- an ascent was used as background music =

GENIUS!


Posted by basd on Apr-11-2007 14:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Boomer187
Isn't this that sandra bullock rehab movie?

That was 28 Days


Posted by Dj O'Callaghan on Apr-11-2007 14:35:

quote:
Originally posted by trewqy
28 days later was just a classic. It was so well directed and it showed how england can be so beautiful if there werent anyone around.

The whole scene where they were travelling to Manchester and looking and the horses and brian eno's- an ascent was used as background music =

GENIUS!


The best bit imagery wise was when his woken up from the coma exited the hospital all the once packed streets of London are deserted, it's so eerie it's untrue.








Will certainly check out this sequel. I'm not expecting much as a lot sequels especially when it comes to horror films tend to be pants.


Posted by Lilith on Apr-11-2007 14:43:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj O'Callaghan
Will certainly check out this sequel. I'm not expecting much as a lot sequels especially when it comes to horror films tend to be pants.

Don't have real high hopes for this one, the 1st was an absolute classic and will be hard to even just equal.


Posted by kush paintings on May-16-2007 06:05:

To both the last posts... I heard someone say that 28 Weeks Later is to 28 Days Later as Aliens was to Alien, and I think that is a great parallel. Both sequels take a low-budget, distinct concept and amp the hell out of it. However, the 28 Weeks Later director (Fresnadillo) really seems to simply be mimicking Danny Boyle's style whereas James Cameron truly brought his own style to Aliens. That said, Fresnadillo does a hell of a job parading as Danny Boyle. He incorporates many of the same short, chaotic shots during the violent scenes with indie-rock expertly blended in. And, to be perfectly honest, the character's stories for the first half or so is really well written, much better than anything written into 28 Days Later IMO. I would be shocked if someone enjoyed 28 Days Later and did not enjoy 28 Weeks Later.


Posted by shaw on May-16-2007 06:08:

If you don't go in expecting 28 Days Later 2, it's alright, but it's not in the same spirit as the first one, so if that's what you have in your head, it'll ruin the movie, 'cuz it's more Holywooded up, less isolated, and less gritty than the first. It's not terrible, but it's definitely not groundbreaking. It's a very good 'meh' in my books. A solid 3/5.


Posted by bas on May-16-2007 06:17:

Three threads on the same movie? Wow.


Posted by shaw on May-16-2007 06:20:

quote:
Originally posted by bas
Three threads on the same movie? Wow.


you quiet.


Posted by Intellekshual on May-16-2007 06:51:

Go see it, it's good. Despite everything you know about sequels - and horror movie sequels - it's very good.

Don't expect the exact same things you love about 28 Days Later. Expect it to take what you loved about the first, and take them in new directions.

Expect to see a whole lot more of the infected.

Expect to see the military in new ways.

Expect to see some brutal gore, and some brutal moments, character-wise.


Posted by LazFX on May-16-2007 06:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Don't have real high hopes for this one, the 1st was an absolute classic and will be hard to even just equal.


Saw it, it was really good. Not like the Days, but Weeks holds its own. Its a keeper!


Posted by Intellekshual on May-16-2007 06:59:

The next one's going to be called: 28 months later.


Posted by shaw on May-16-2007 07:00:

quote:
Originally posted by Enigmatik
The next one's going to be called: 28 months later.


there is no next one. The world dies.


Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.