Xone 62 and DJM-400 - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Xone 62 and DJM-400

Posted by cassa.de.x on Apr-13-2007 22:02:

Xone 62 and DJM-400

Question for those who've recorded mixes on both a 62 and a DJM-8/400:

I own a DJM-400 but wanted something with a few more channels. I know the 62 is years-old in comparison, but will I be taking a hit in sound fidelity when I record mixes?

Posted by Yohan on Apr-13-2007 22:35:

In terms of sound quality, xone > pioneer

Posted by idoru on Apr-13-2007 22:46:

quote:
Originally posted by EvilTree
In terms of sound quality, xone > pioneer

End of thread, really.

Posted by cassa.de.x on Apr-13-2007 22:59:

quote:
Originally posted by idoru
End of thread, really.

In the words of Bill Paxton as Pvt. Hudson,

"Game over, man! Game over."

Posted by Allen Mueller on Apr-13-2007 23:00:

You wont be taking a hit you'll be upgrading in sound quality.

Posted by miamitranceman on Apr-14-2007 00:19:

Unless you are using digital cables into CDJs from the 400. Then you have the digital/analog debate.

Posted by nutsan on Apr-14-2007 00:31:

quote:
Originally posted by miamitranceman
Unless you are using digital cables into CDJs from the 400. Then you have the digital/analog debate.

the djm400 doesn't have digital connections

Posted by miamitranceman on Apr-14-2007 01:17:

quote:
Originally posted by nutsan
the djm400 doesn't have digital connections

Oops yeah, meant the 800.

Posted by Marcus007 on Apr-15-2007 20:07:

It depends what kind of music you want to play. If you're going for a proggy-house sound than go with the 62. If you wanna fool around with FXs and play trance go with the 400.