TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- LOL the GREATEST POLICE FORCE IN THE WORLD
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:00:

LOL the GREATEST POLICE FORCE IN THE WORLD

man Chicago police rule!


Posted by RJT on Apr-27-2007 01:07:

Wow. Unbelievable.

Chicago PD... they just keep winning.

Edit: Is this new, I can't find any news on it?


Posted by jonSun on Apr-27-2007 01:14:

I didnt get the station. Was this on the south side? im assuming it was.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:16:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
Wow. Unbelievable.

Chicago PD... they just keep winning.

Edit: Is this new, I can't find any news on it?
It happened two years ago but the police let the video out recently.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:17:

quote:
Originally posted by jonSun
I didnt get the station. Was this on the south side? im assuming it was.
Yes.


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:21:

to me, it did look like it might have been an accident. He shouldn't have had his gun drawn in the first place, but it doesn't look like he just aimed & shot. Also, the narrator claiming that this is even moreso the fault of the officer, since his tardiness put him there at that time, is irrelevant. That would require the validity of the assumption that tardiness results in murder. In any case, it's unfortunate and looks like it got out of hand and could've been avoided, but to instantly claim that the guy's guilty of murder and that there's a huge cover-up is a bit of a stretch. The fact that they concealed the video isn't surprising. Sounds more like somebody wants to get on a charge against the police and, while they've come close, they haven't gotten ahold of that gem of a case with which to do it.


Posted by RJT on Apr-27-2007 01:23:

The cop is at the very least guilty of manslaughter and gross negligence.



The video is obviously narrated by someone with a pretty set agenda, but either way, I'd like the know what the consequences for the officer were.


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:29:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
The cop is at the very least guilty of manslaughter and gross negligence.



The video is obviously narrated by someone with a pretty set agenda, but either way, I'd like the know what the consequences for the officer were.


hmm...I'd need more to go on to tell just what his role/fault were in the case. Just going by the video and what was said, though, it certainly seems possible to me that it could have been an accident. Like I said, I don't know why he had his gun drawn to begin with (maybe someone else had a weapon), but it didn't seem necessary. Just jumping to a conclusion, when we can't even see the fight or tell what happened to cause the shot is a bit rash, though. The one thing in all of this that he's clearly guilty of, though, is falsifying his report about the event. That doesn't mean he's guilty of everything else--just meant he felt guilty about something. Shooting someone for any reason could cause that.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:31:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
The cop is at the very least guilty of manslaughter and gross negligence.



The video is obviously narrated by someone with a pretty set agenda, but either way, I'd like the know what the consequences for the officer were.
NO CONSEQUENCES. He was given a raise and praised for his bravery.


Posted by igottaknow on Apr-27-2007 01:32:

cor vers: pigs stick together


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:35:

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
NO CONSEQUENCES. He was given a raise and praised for his bravery.




I knew somebody was going to say that, since that's exactly the point that the narrator is trying to convey, despite the fact that it's [most likely] inaccurate.


Posted by wotyzoid on Apr-27-2007 01:37:

wow you cant even trust law enforcement these days, everybody is corrupt, i dont get how they were so casual about it, the guy was just shot in the head for god's sake.


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:39:

k since we're going to go to emotional and irrational knee-jerk responses, I'll take the cue and exit.


Posted by Clovis on Apr-27-2007 01:39:

Murder isn't murder if it was by accident?


Posted by igottaknow on Apr-27-2007 01:40:

quote:
Originally posted by wotyzoid
wow you cant even trust law enforcement these days, everybody is corrupt, i dont get how they were so casual about it, the guy was just shot in the head for god's sake.

i was thinking the same thing. the two of them continue their conversation as if nothing has happened.


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:42:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Murder isn't murder if it was by accident?


um, actually, no, it isn't.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:43:

quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous


I knew somebody was going to say that, since that's exactly the point that the narrator is trying to convey, despite the fact that it's [most likely] inaccurate.
No I live in the Chicago area. And I know for a fact that nothing happened to the police man who shot him.


Posted by igottaknow on Apr-27-2007 01:43:

btw if this was nyc the cop would have shot him 20 times before claiming self defense. i say chicago cops are pussies


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:45:

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
No I live in the Chicago area. And I know for a fact that nothing happened to the police man who shot him.


A: He lists consequences in the video.
B: You commented that he was raised due to his bravery--presumably for this incident--even though it was quite some time later, and the narrator gave no reason for the promotion. Since he didn't give the reason, you assumed that it was for this, or because they like him. That was the intent of the narrator, and you fell for it.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:47:

quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
A: He lists consequences in the video.
B: You commented that he was raised due to his bravery--presumably for this incident--even though it was quite some time later, and the narrator gave no reason for the promotion. Since he didn't give the reason, you assumed that it was for this, or because they like him. That was the intent of the narrator, and you fell for it.
I didn't fall for anything chuck. The police officer was tried later and received sentencing it just happened to be a couple of years later.

What is wrong is that our police chief sucks ass. He luckily resigned after an off duty cop beat the crap out of a waitress for no reason.


Posted by wotyzoid on Apr-27-2007 01:48:

quote:
Originally posted by igottaknow
btw if this was nyc the cop would have shot him 20 times before claiming self defense. i say chicago cops are pussies


+ F-ing 1


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:49:

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
I didn't fall for anything chuck. The police officer was tried later and received sentencing it just happened to be a couple of years later.

What is wrong is that our police chief sucks ass. He luckily resigned after an off duty cop beat the crap out of a waitress for no reason.


You didn't refute my point.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:51:

quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
You didn't refute my point.
Yes, I did. I said I wasn't pulled in I pulled myself out.


Posted by shaw on Apr-27-2007 01:53:

quote:
Originally posted by metalgearsolid
Yes, I did. I said I wasn't pulled in I pulled myself out.


. um...ok, I guess...? Enough arguing for me for the night.


Posted by metalgearsolid on Apr-27-2007 01:53:

quote:
Originally posted by inconspicuous
. um...ok, I guess...? Enough arguing for me for the night.
Hey...were are not done yet.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.