TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Pioneer CDJ-800 MK2 vs. Denon DNS-3500
Pioneer CDJ-800 MK2 vs. Denon DNS-3500
I've had a pair of Numark Axis 4s and a BCD2000 hooked up to my Event TR8s for about three months now. I've outgrown that setup. It's time for an upgrade. (To the decks and mixer, not the speakers, obviously.)
I'm stuck, though. I've been reading reviews for weeks and I just can't make a decision on which CDJs to buy.
I've ruled out the c314s, the Axis 9s, and the CDJ200s. Each seems to be missing something critical. However, I need to keep the total cost of the CDJs and a good mixer to around $1600 US... so that knocks me out of grabbing a pair of CDJ1000s or DNS-5000s.
It seems like I'm left with a choice of either the Pioneer CDJ800s or the Denon DNS-3500s. The DNS-3500s look cool because of the motorized platters. But are they better than the 800s? Are there more features on the 3500s? Is the vinyl emulation more convincing? Is the spinning platter even worth a damn? I don't scratch much. I mix trance, house, and the occasional electro set.
I'm thinking that the CDJ800s are the way to go. But that leaves me with another huge question: which mixer? I've looked at both the DJM400 and the Numark 5000FX. I like the 5000FX because of the number of channels but I don't know about the quality of the FX. I've heard that the DJM400 is damn good in that department.
Thoughts, anyone? A pair of 3500s will run me $1210 brand new and the CDJ800s will run me $1232. I can get either mixer for right around the $400 mark new. So, it's really a question of quality.
Any input would be appreciated.
I would say Djm800, for the reliability, though I like the spinning platter on the denon
I've heard that anyone who owns the Denons switches off the spinning platter to mix cos it's horrible to work with.
Which means the pio's are the solid choice here......
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Jarvmeister I've heard that anyone who owns the Denons switches off the spinning platter to mix cos it's horrible to work with. Which means the pio's are the solid choice here...... |
id go with the CDJ800s and maybe if you cant afford a DJM800, try maybe a 600? definately dont get a Numark 500FX
A DJM600 is way out of my price range... and I don't think I'd ever use four channels to be honest.
How about a 400?
Are you going to be using effects? If not, check out Vestax Mixers. I use a VMC-004 and its built like a tank and solid as hell
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancematic A DJM600 is way out of my price range... and I don't think I'd ever use four channels to be honest. How about a 400? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by wotyzoid the 400 is just fine, you wont regret it. |
Hehe, you couldn't have had the DJM-400 that long... resist the upgrade bug!
Within my first year of DJ'ing... I went from:
1. Software only
2. 2 Denon DN-S1000's and a numark DXM-01.
3. Upgraded mixer to a DN-X1500
4. Added Numark TT-200's
5. Upgraded CD decks to CDJ-1000's
6. Upgraded TT-200's to 1200 MK5's
7. Upgraded mixer to a Xone 92
It's an expensive addiction to get better gear 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by miamitranceman +1...I've got 800 mk2s and a DJM-400. It is a great setup. I love the mixer but I'm actually looking to upgrade to a DJM 800. PM if you're interested in the 400 or just have any general questions about it. |
Re: Pioneer CDJ-800 MK2 vs. Denon DNS-3500
| quote: |
| Originally posted by trancematic I need to keep the total cost of the CDJs and a good mixer to around $1600 US... so that knocks me out of grabbing a pair of CDJ1000s or DNS-5000s. |
the 5000's are cheaper than the 3500
What are the CDJ-200s missing for you, just out of curiosity?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by david.michael What are the CDJ-200s missing for you, just out of curiosity? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by nutsan yeah i was just gonna ask the same question? i love mine |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by agentdansmith Vinyl mode? |
just wondered if there was anything else.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by agentdansmith Vinyl mode? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by david.michael That's what I thought, until he said he doesn't really scratch, so that indicated it was probably a non-issue to me. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by agentdansmith I don't scratch but I can't stand using CDJ mode - I hate the stutter and I like to cue my tracks manually by hand. Just a personal preference of course. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by agentdansmith I don't scratch but I can't stand using CDJ mode - I hate the stutter and I like to cue my tracks manually by hand. Just a personal preference of course. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by agentdansmith I don't scratch but I can't stand using CDJ mode - I hate the stutter and I like to cue my tracks manually by hand. Just a personal preference of course. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sterilis thats why i prefer the 800s. that stutter is aggravating and hurts my ears. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Ryan0751 Hehe, you couldn't have had the DJM-400 that long... resist the upgrade bug! Within my first year of DJ'ing... I went from: 1. Software only 2. 2 Denon DN-S1000's and a numark DXM-01. 3. Upgraded mixer to a DN-X1500 4. Added Numark TT-200's 5. Upgraded CD decks to CDJ-1000's 6. Upgraded TT-200's to 1200 MK5's 7. Upgraded mixer to a Xone 92 It's an expensive addiction to get better gear |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.