TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Great news!!!! No link between Marijuana & Cancer!!!!!


Posted by Mortyman on May-13-2007 23:17:

Smoking ..umm..something Great news!!!! No link between Marijuana & Cancer!!!!!

Ah fuck it, I have the power to close my threads but not re-open them?? wtf?

Here it is agian, Cosmic Fur, noticed your hread was from last year... and this deserves another viewing

LINK

Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection

By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 26, 2006; A03



The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.

The new findings "were against our expectations," said Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years.

"We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use," he said. "What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect."

Federal health and drug enforcement officials have widely used Tashkin's previous work on marijuana to make the case that the drug is dangerous. Tashkin said that while he still believes marijuana is potentially harmful, its cancer-causing effects appear to be of less concern than previously thought.

Earlier work established that marijuana does contain cancer-causing chemicals as potentially harmful as those in tobacco, he said. However, marijuana also contains the chemical THC, which he said may kill aging cells and keep them from becoming cancerous.

Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people without cancer matched by age, sex and neighborhood.

They were all asked about their lifetime use of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol. The heaviest marijuana smokers had lighted up more than 22,000 times, while moderately heavy usage was defined as smoking 11,000 to 22,000 marijuana cigarettes. Tashkin found that even the very heavy marijuana smokers showed no increased incidence of the three cancers studied.

"This is the largest case-control study ever done, and everyone had to fill out a very extensive questionnaire about marijuana use," he said. "Bias can creep into any research, but we controlled for as many confounding factors as we could, and so I believe these results have real meaning."

Tashkin's group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had hypothesized that marijuana would raise the risk of cancer on the basis of earlier small human studies, lab studies of animals, and the fact that marijuana users inhale more deeply and generally hold smoke in their lungs longer than tobacco smokers -- exposing them to the dangerous chemicals for a longer time. In addition, Tashkin said, previous studies found that marijuana tar has 50 percent higher concentrations of chemicals linked to cancer than tobacco cigarette tar.

While no association between marijuana smoking and cancer was found, the study findings, presented to the American Thoracic Society International Conference this week, did find a 20-fold increase in lung cancer among people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.

The study was limited to people younger than 60 because those older than that were generally not exposed to marijuana in their youth, when it is most often tried.


SMOKE EM IF YOU GOT EM!!!


Posted by darouge11 on May-13-2007 23:36:

we can still view the other thread :P


Posted by Cosmic Fur on May-13-2007 23:48:

I'm going to get bump the old thread to add even more hilarity and confusion to this whole thing.


Posted by Mortyman on May-14-2007 00:15:

haha, the reason why I closed the first one cause I didn't see the date when you posted yours... is it even the same article???

Yes, peopel we are (probably) stoned


Posted by Vivid Boy on May-14-2007 00:41:

yeah thats great but did they test street weed? with the chemicals and roids they inject into the plant to get it as potent as it is off the streets? proly not


Posted by Adamo on May-14-2007 01:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Vivid Boy
yeah thats great but did they test street weed? with the chemicals and roids they inject into the plant to get it as potent as it is off the streets? proly not


man this statement is just filled with retardedness...


Posted by Ace_of_Spades on May-14-2007 02:07:

Re: Great news!!!! No link between Marijuana & Cancer!!!!!

quote:
Originally posted by Mortyman
Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people without cancer matched by age , sex and neighborhood.

They were all asked about their lifetime use of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol. The heaviest marijuana smokers had lighted up more than 22,000 times, while moderately heavy usage was defined as smoking 11,000 to 22,000 marijuana cigarettes. Tashkin found that even the very heavy marijuana smokers showed no increased incidence of the three cancers studied.


quote:
Originally posted by Vivid Boy
yeah thats great but did they test street weed? with the chemicals and roids they inject into the plant to get it as potent as it is off the streets? proly not


Dude i think you didn't read the whole thing. They did their research based on people ,not marijuana. So anyone who confessed of using could have used any kind of marijuana including the chemical induced ones.

P.S Good news! I'm going out to get some and smoke!

I would do the same regardless of the news,lol! PEACE.


Posted by Vivid Boy on May-14-2007 02:58:

Re: Re: Great news!!!! No link between Marijuana & Cancer!!!!!

quote:
Originally posted by extacy_bomb
Dude i think you didn't read the whole thing.



sorry my ADD wont allow me to read whole articles or full posts. what I've quoted out of ur post is all i have read. If the rest is necessary and makes my post now irrelevant, im sorry for that too.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.