TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Why Make A Track Difficult to Mix??
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Jarvmeister on Jun-28-2007 18:06:

Why Make A Track Difficult to Mix??

Two examples:

Kris Menace: Lumberjack
Kris Menace: Fairlight

These tracks are incredibly difficult to mix because they either have an irregular/short intro or a quick fading outro or both.

Why would you produce a track like that and deliberately decrease the chances of people playing it? I can mix it - it just doesn't sound great and I'd never do it in a risky situation.

Jarv


Posted by BOOsTER on Jun-28-2007 18:09:

might be a try to sound unique...not enough experience...sometimes some sequencers have timing issues...can be whatever you name...

some track just are difficult to mix...get used to it...


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-28-2007 18:37:

Because all tracks aren't supposed to be mixed.


Posted by DiscoStew on Jun-28-2007 18:49:

Re: Why Make A Track Difficult to Mix??

quote:
Originally posted by Jarvmeister
Two examples:

Kris Menace: Lumberjack
Kris Menace: Fairlight

These tracks are incredibly difficult to mix because they either have an irregular/short intro or a quick fading outro or both.

Why would you produce a track like that and deliberately decrease the chances of people playing it? I can mix it - it just doesn't sound great and I'd never do it in a risky situation.

Jarv


Why not add your own touch by re-editing the track. Or simply open an editor, loop the intro and outro for a while, save, and voila.


Posted by s3nate on Jun-28-2007 18:53:

This is what separates the decent dj's from the GOOD dj's. Go have a listen to some classic trance stuff. Almost none of them are really DJ friendly.


Posted by nefardec on Jun-28-2007 18:57:

and listen to old school dj mixes and you'll see it's hardly necessary to have perfectly matching track segments for cookie cutter transitions


Posted by sr126 on Jun-28-2007 19:27:

i have always been resentful of people who make tracks that fade out. now that i have a small studio set up, i can fix that for some songs...

to me, trance, house, techno, jungle, etc is dj music, pure and simple.

what is the point of fading out tracks anyways? i put money down on a record, i want to play it how ever i want to hear it. fading out the track at then places a restriction on that freedom. nothing kills my horny faster than using the end of track to build up the next track, then first tracks dies out (fades out) and takes that energy away with it.

someone needs to remind these jerks that fade out their tracks that every dj mixer in the world has faders, we don't need them to do it for us. i don't care about their production style... -that's up to the producer, and has nothing to do w/me... what ever they do, how ever they start, or end a track, i can deal with it... just leave the fading to me, the dj. thx


Posted by DiscoStew on Jun-28-2007 19:31:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
and listen to old school dj mixes and you'll see it's hardly necessary to have perfectly matching track segments for cookie cutter transitions


Totally true. Personally, i prefer mixes with slight imperfections. It makes it more of a real live performance. Rock bands never sound as good in concert as on CD, but their performances are great because they go up there full of energy and jam their asses off. The same thing goes for DJ's. So many Ableton mixes sound so cold and have completely cookie-cutter mixing.


Posted by Pinokio on Jun-28-2007 20:18:

Actually I don't like senseless intros and outros.
It feels like it's not part of the song.
I've been listening to a lot of Psy-trance lately and you can listen songs from the begining to the end. That is awesome, they create complete songs without the "Obvious senseless bum bum at the beginning and at the end"

I knwo the music it's supposed to be mixable, but still you are creating a song, if you wan to create a masterpiece, then you should forget about the senseless bum-bum. It should be a "song" from the beginning 'till the end.


Posted by Zild on Jun-28-2007 20:27:

I usually don't let much of the intro/outro play anyway. I even like cueing tracks with two breakdowns on the phrase after the first breakdown.


Posted by sleepydragon on Jun-28-2007 20:45:

quote:
Originally posted by Pinokio

I knwo the music it's supposed to be mixable, but still you are creating a song, if you wan to create a masterpiece, then you should forget about the senseless bum-bum. It should be a "song" from the beginning 'till the end.


yes but u still want to make a track that the big djs will want to play to give u exposure


Posted by Alex on Jun-28-2007 20:58:

What a retarded question.

The guy is an artist, first and foremost artists make tracks for people to LISTEN to!

In our line of work, secondly, they make them to play/be played out by themselves and other DJs, ultimately though, to gain recognition for their track.


Posted by Stu Cox on Jun-28-2007 21:00:

"Why make a track difficult to mix?"

I doubt that was the aim - it's just a by-product of wanting it to sound good if it's just played on its own, you have to be a bit more creative with the intro which then means DJs who don't know how to deal with anything other than a standard 32 bar kick & bass intro get confused.

Surely it's your job to work around the way the producer makes the track rather than the other way round?

Loads of tracks have irregular lengthed intros - just learn to work out where to position it so that it works. I remember when I used to drop Dave McCullen - 'Bitch' at the commercial house nights at our uni I'd skip forward to the point where the bassline drops in, whack the CDJ into reverse and play it backwards for 16 bars of the other tune cos that was the only way I could work out where to start it to make it drop in time lol


Posted by RJT on Jun-28-2007 21:01:

Re: Why Make A Track Difficult to Mix??

quote:
Originally posted by Jarvmeister
Whay make a track difficult to mix?


To make me a better DJ.


Posted by miamitranceman on Jun-28-2007 21:17:

I wouldn't call "Fairlight" a very difficult track to mix into, out of IMO.


Posted by Nemesis44 on Jun-28-2007 21:23:

quote:
Originally posted by Stu Cox
"Why make a track difficult to mix?"

Surely it's your job to work around the way the producer makes the track rather than the other way round?


Amen.

This is also where harmonic mixing can help a lot because it allows you to overlay stuff differently.
Unless something has irregular BPMs you can pretty much mix anything. Just have to know how to.

People these days are also so hell bent on mix intro/outro whilst there are so many other ways to do it.

Cheers
Nem


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-28-2007 21:25:

quote:
Originally posted by sleepydragon
yes but u still want to make a track that the big djs will want to play to give u exposure

How do you know what the producer wants to achieve with the track?


Posted by FreqNasty2 on Jun-29-2007 03:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
Because all tracks aren't supposed to be mixed.


no anything with a sine wave can be mixed with perfection


Posted by Project-K on Jun-29-2007 05:33:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
and listen to old school dj mixes and you'll see it's hardly necessary to have perfectly matching track segments for cookie cutter transitions


I find that for that reason, old mixes are far more interresting. It's not always a smooth transition between one 'unn-tss-unn-tss-unn-tss' to another 'unn-tss-unn-tss-unn-tss', sometimes you have quick fades, tempo changes, beatless transitions, beatless outtros being layered over riffs from an incoming song, etc.


Posted by Domesticated on Jun-29-2007 05:40:

Speaking of, what are the tracks you guys find hard to mix?

I have always found Rex The Dog's tracks to be a bitch, as well as Rui da Silva - Lixuneanos.


Posted by CashMoneyHoes on Jun-29-2007 07:32:

quote:
Originally posted by Beat Blog
Speaking of, what are the tracks you guys find hard to mix?

I have always found Rex The Dog's tracks to be a bitch, as well as Rui da Silva - Lixuneanos.


depends what your using, there could be many factors involved when you mix for months and can't get it flawless like in the old days


Posted by Mr.Mystery on Jun-29-2007 09:09:

quote:
Originally posted by Beat Blog
Speaking of, what are the tracks you guys find hard to mix?

No tracks as such, but I have a couple of bad vinyl pressings where the beats drift and they just won't stay aligned no matter what I do.


Posted by bamski on Jun-29-2007 09:21:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
No tracks as such, but I have a couple of bad vinyl pressings where the beats drift and they just won't stay aligned no matter what I do.


+1

I have a release of Hawtin's Minus Orange and the A2 version instafucks at about a minute, the 12" doesn't have the slightest flaw on it so i thought back in the day that it was made intentionally

Still haven't mixed it right


Posted by Mmanu on Jun-29-2007 09:34:

"Why make a track difficult to mix?"

1. practise more.

2. make your own edits.

[/thread]


Posted by Beatflux on Jun-29-2007 13:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Stu Cox
Loads of tracks have irregular lengthed intros - just learn to work out where to position it so that it works. I remember when I used to drop Dave McCullen - 'Bitch' at the commercial house nights at our uni I'd skip forward to the point where the bassline drops in, whack the CDJ into reverse and play it backwards for 16 bars of the other tune cos that was the only way I could work out where to start it to make it drop in time lol


Nice.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.