TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Mixed in Key - Any Good?iews about thi
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Nikolas Vaughn on Jul-16-2007 07:31:

Mixed in Key - Any Good?iews about thi

Reviews about this product? looking into purchasing, does it work... worth the cash... easy to navigate etc?

cheers


Posted by Allayla on Jul-16-2007 07:38:

i have the free trial and its wrong seriously every time, maybe because its the free trial..

mixmiester is right about 60% of the time and its free

mixshare works the best and free as well


Posted by Allied Nations on Jul-16-2007 07:52:

mixmeister is free? where?


Posted by Nikolas Vaughn on Jul-16-2007 07:53:

yeh...

ive heard good reports about this, then bad ones.... really hard to gauge whether to purchase it or not


Posted by agentdansmith on Jul-16-2007 08:11:

quote:
Originally posted by Allied Nations
mixmeister is free? where?


The free trial doesn't expire and wont let you save/export any mixes, but you use the program to find your tracks key/bpm and keep them all in a library


Posted by skip on Jul-16-2007 08:12:

there have been a few topics on this before.
and it's not worth your money, it's the most inaccurate of all the three:
mixmeister, rapidevolution and mixedinkey
rapid evolution was the most accurate while still only getting about 70% or so right.


Posted by nefardec on Jul-16-2007 14:54:

seriously. download a free software keyboard and use your ears.

you might become a better dj and learn something about music!


Posted by Nemesis44 on Jul-16-2007 15:18:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
seriously. download a free software keyboard and use your ears.

you might become a better dj and learn something about music!


I second this.

Cheers
Nem


Posted by DiscoStew on Jul-16-2007 16:10:

quote:
Originally posted by starboy
its wrong seriously every time



+1 I trust my ears more than this piece.

Besides, not all tracks need to be perfectly in key. Avoid major key clashes, but if you're really mixing on the fly (and not making a pre-arranged set) there are going to be some slight imperfections -- that's the nature of a live performance.


Posted by Allayla on Jul-16-2007 16:46:

quote:
Originally posted by DJChrisB
+1 I trust my ears more than this piece.

Besides, not all tracks need to be perfectly in key. Avoid major key clashes, but if you're really mixing on the fly (and not making a pre-arranged set) there are going to be some slight imperfections -- that's the nature of a live performance.

Right on the money.


Posted by Nikolas Vaughn on Jul-17-2007 04:16:

pre-arranged sets.... wouldnt you classify that as cheating.

reason why im looking for a program (used to key all my trance when i played it), is now that i play a range of house styles, im buying 10-15 tracks a week on average, and its pretty hard to remember how they all go and sound and will go with what etc


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-17-2007 04:55:

ears

i think you can get them for free.


Posted by Beatflux on Jul-17-2007 05:17:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec


you might become a better dj and learn something about music!


Leern?


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jul-17-2007 09:10:

mixed in key has been a tool i use to label the tracks keys, and then organize my cd binders that way. I don't live and die by those keys when mixing, but always find it handy to know that 2 or 3 pages of my cd's are somewhat compatible and am able to get to them quickly when in a pinch. It is really limiting if you only attempt to use the system in terms of track selection, but i think we all know not every track has to be "in key" to sound good...there are quite a few exceptions to do this rule if you pop them in properly. When you are playing a "freestyle set..ie no set plan", it can come in handy when you really have a stutter and not sure what to play. Doesn't happen ofen, but sometimes that beer is mighty tasty and you forget the track playing needs to be attended to and quick. (ya i do jesus poses too)

overall it isnt a nescesity, but has some useful fuctions...
DO NOT TAKE THE BPM'S IT GIVES AS FACT BECAUSE YOU WILL BE SURPRISED...im not bad now hearing the keys by ear, but can be slightly off at times due to a slight loss of hearing in one of my ears....oh well frankie wilde and hummus biznitches.


Posted by Allayla on Jul-17-2007 16:14:

mixed in key program is terrible, the end.


Posted by basilisk on Jul-17-2007 17:31:

Yeah, don't waste your money. Get Rapid Evolution 2 from mixshare.com and learn how to use it properly. It analyzes the key for you (but you'll probably want to get your BPM information elsehwere)... however, it is smartly designed--it includes a piano, as well as an "accuracy" reading of how well it feels the key has been analyzed. This means you can work from the bottom up and refine your results while still enjoying the time-saving benefits of automation. It's the best solution, and trust me, I've looked into this.

All the people screaming "ears" are right on one level, but unless your name is Muad'dib you're not certain to be picking out a properly keyed track from your bin, wallet, or directory. Why waste the time sorting it out on the fly when you can do your research and know in advance?


Posted by Allayla on Jul-17-2007 17:40:

quote:
Originally posted by basilisk
Yeah, don't waste your money. Get Rapid Evolution 2 from mixshare.com and learn how to use it properly. It analyzes the key for you (but you'll probably want to get your BPM information elsehwere)... however, it is smartly designed--it includes a piano, as well as an "accuracy" reading of how well it feels the key has been analyzed. This means you can work from the bottom up and refine your results while still enjoying the time-saving benefits of automation. It's the best solution, and trust me, I've looked into this.

All the people screaming "ears" are right on one level, but unless your name is Muad'dib you're not certain to be picking out a properly keyed track from your bin, wallet, or directory. Why waste the time sorting it out on the fly when you can do your research and know in advance?

very well said and 100% acurate on both both points.

if you want 100% acuracy for bpm's use mixmeister

i also agree with what your saying about people who "use their ears"


Posted by Ryan0751 on Jul-17-2007 17:50:

Well I think what people are saying by "using your ears" is figuring out the key yourself using a keyboard, not really knowing every key by just hearing a track. Most musicians can't do that.

I think it's important to learn a little bit of music theory if you are going to go this route.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jul-17-2007 17:51:

quote:
Originally posted by starboy
very well said and 100% acurate on both both points.

if you want 100% acuracy for bpm's use mixmeister

i also agree with what your saying about people who "use their ears"


why? If you actually become able to pick out the key by ear, it will go a long way if you decide to produce quality music. You don't need to know hoe to read sheet musci either to produce or dj, but if you have some music theory down it puts you ahead of the rest. Everyone has their own software,techniques,ways they have learned, and thats the thin...when you dj you use what works best for you so long as it works.Not everyone uses the .8 technique to mix, but yet they can still do it effectively. Use NONE of these programs as a selector of tracks to mix with, but as just an extra "cheat" to help you learn better. After awhile of using these you actually start to hear the keys on your own.I have a little more trouble due to hearing loss sometimes but it can still happen quite a bit.
Starboy this isn't a quip on you, i just didnt know you mixed...can i have a link to one of your sets?


Use any technique or program you feel comfortable in so long as it works for you and gets the results you want.

and i trust me head more than mixmeister for bpm's they aren't always accurate...and im not saying that because i dislike that program.


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jul-17-2007 18:00:

god if only mixmeister could type for me


Posted by nefardec on Jul-17-2007 18:05:

the best track-track mixes i've ever done have always been those where i am just getting into the track that's currently playing and suddenly in my mind's ear i 'hear' another sound and then when i catch that sound in my head i think "where did that come from" and then i realize it's part of another track and then the more I think of it the better it will sound.

even before 'key matching', i would stress 'sound matching' or 'tone matching', where you're mixing tracks with similar tonal, sonic, and rhythmic concepts. the key is just sort of a basic metric that doesn't tell you much about anything. just because two songs are in related keys doesn't mean anything


Problem is this sort of creative flash doesn't come ALL the time, and sometimes the intuition is just wrong, so when you have your tracks keyed it gives you an affirmation of what you already knew


Posted by all-nite-freak on Jul-17-2007 18:17:

thats what i was almost trying to say, but yeah..you said it better. Once in awhile when on the fly i get a "stutter"(just) a wtf should i play feeling...it really is paractical to have a few pages of cd to help chose on those occasions.This happens mostly when playing a spanking new track with me.


Posted by Allayla on Jul-17-2007 21:32:

let me just put it into perspective on how i feel about the whole thing. a lot of the big producers and dj's pay close attention to key clashes and key tagging etc simply because they want to sound good just like the most of us here do. also by figuring out what keys your music is in will save so much time why would you not want to do it? by knowing the musical aspects of your tracks and productions, you eliminate the guesswork (ejecting cd's etc) and even can organize your library this way.

and that whole "monotonous" argument is bs.. there are so many ways you can pull off harmonic mixes +1-1+4-3+7+2 and even other combo's you can get away with if you know your music, just have to watch out for overlaping melodies and high's and low's clashing.

im sick of people saying that they mix harmonicly with their ears, im sorry sorry but that is very rare. songs with compatable keys will accept each other rather than fight against each other. in other words as we all know the bass kick and high hats will sound great together rather than clash if they are compatable, so i suppose you could do it this way, or overlap the meat of the tracks to see if you get a sour response.. but why would you want to go throught the trouble?

i don't believe anybody here that says they can ID the key of a track just by listening to it, sorry. why not use a GOOD program like RE (or even better a keyboard) and tag your music and get creative.

mixed in key is garbage btw & mixmeister is indeed pretty much 100% correct with bpm's its never been wrong for me.


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jul-17-2007 23:07:

quote:
Originally posted by basilisk
All the people screaming "ears" are right on one level, but unless your name is Muad'dib you're not certain to be picking out a properly keyed track from your bin, wallet, or directory. Why waste the time sorting it out on the fly when you can do your research and know in advance?


um, which is why we write the key on our tracks perhaps?? "doing your research" does not equate with using ripoff software like mixed in key. my ears are cheaper and far more accurate.


Posted by Ryan0751 on Jul-17-2007 23:49:

Sadly though... lots of bedroom DJ's heard the phrase "harmonic mixing" and "the big DJ's do it..." and don't really want to be bothered with learning scales and keys.

quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
um, which is why we write the key on our tracks perhaps?? "doing your research" does not equate with using ripoff software like mixed in key. my ears are cheaper and far more accurate.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.