TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- The Plame Lawsuit


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-20-2007 05:28:

The Plame Lawsuit



TOSSED.


Posted by Omega_M on Jul-20-2007 05:40:

well they were expecting it.

...

This really irritated me.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290060,00.html


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-20-2007 06:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
well they were expecting it.


what?

...

quote:
This really irritated me.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,290060,00.html


what did you expect him to say? it's John Gibson's editorial.

do you even know what an editorial is?


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jul-20-2007 08:19:

Do a short background check on the judge.

Then ask yourself if you're comfortable living in such illegit conditions.


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Jul-20-2007 17:21:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
Do a short background check on the judge.

Then ask yourself if you're comfortable living in such illegit conditions.


Is that a rhetorical question for our dear Bush apologist who's never disagreed with the mighty leader once in his life?


Posted by Omega_M on Jul-20-2007 17:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
what?

Her lawyer and most people knew before hand this was going to be a very difficult case to win. It's there in the papers. Read it.

quote:
do you even know what an editorial is?

No I don't. And what does the fact that it's an editorial got to do with my irritation over his views ?


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-21-2007 02:17:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
Do a short background check on the judge.

Then ask yourself if you're comfortable living in such illegit conditions.


what? that he's a conservative jurist? GOOD!

i rather have someone base his judgement on the letter of the law and not stretch the means to fit his political ends.

see this is where you liberals lose so much of your intellectual credibility (as if you, DJShibster, had any to begin with). you applaud conservative jurists when it suits your political motivations but the second they hand a verdict to you that doesn't jive with those motivations youre off to the races with allegations of a vast right-wing conspiracy, having very little knowledge, yourself, of the laws that had just been applied.


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-21-2007 02:25:

quote:
Originally posted by Omega_M
Her lawyer and most people knew before hand this was going to be a very difficult case to win.



ok, then what does that immediately tell you about this whole charade?

the Wilson's aren't media whores are they? the Dems never had a dog in this fight did they? noooooo


quote:
No I don't. And what does the fact that it's an editorial got to do with my irritation over his views ?


don't lie dude, you thought that was a straight FoxNews article reporting on the Plame Lawsuit. and because it was on FoxNews you were crying bias. c'mon.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jul-21-2007 03:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
what? that he's a conservative jurist? GOOD!

i rather have someone base his judgement on the letter of the law and not stretch the means to fit his political ends.

see this is where you liberals lose so much of your intellectual credibility (as if you, DJShibster, had any to begin with). you applaud conservative jurists when it suits your political motivations but the second they hand a verdict to you that doesn't jive with those motivations youre off to the races with allegations of a vast right-wing conspiracy, having very little knowledge, yourself, of the laws that had just been applied.


lol

The craziest part is that you actually believe the reality you've created for yourself.


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-21-2007 03:32:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
lol

The craziest part is that you actually believe the reality you've created for yourself.


really? you acknowledge no reality...and you embrace that. thats f**king crazy.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jul-21-2007 03:48:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
really? you acknowledge no reality...and you embrace that. thats f**king crazy.


That's because I'm comfortable with existence as it is.

I don't think there's anything crazy about questioning everything there is to question; that's human.

I do, however, find such blind allegiance (even to the point of memory swapping) to meager political ends or religions an avenue for future mental illness.


Posted by Q5echo on Jul-21-2007 04:16:

quote:
Originally posted by DJ Shibby
That's because I'm comfortable with existence as it is.


no you're not. wtf is that? you are far from apolitical...at least the reality you've created for yourself here in this forum anyway.

quote:
I don't think there's anything crazy about questioning everything there is to question; that's human.

I do, however, find such blind allegiance (even to the point of memory swapping) to meager political ends or religions an avenue for future mental illness.


OBFUSCATION.

this thread is very simple. it's not that complicated.

...as if you're relieved from any "blind allegiances" yourself. please dude.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Jul-22-2007 10:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
no you're not. wtf is that? you are far from apolitical...at least the reality you've created for yourself here in this forum anyway.



OBFUSCATION.

this thread is very simple. it's not that complicated.

...as if you're relieved from any "blind allegiances" yourself. please dude.


Question...

Do you wish the best for yourself first? Or do you wish the best for the world first?

Answer as you will.


Posted by Omega_M on Jul-22-2007 16:20:

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
ok, then what does that immediately tell you about this whole charade?
the Wilson's aren't media whores are they? the Dems never had a dog in this fight did they? noooooo


So you want them to accept everything quietly and move on with their lives ? Let Ms. Plame get back to work as an undercover spy.

Oh wait, now she can't.

quote:
don't lie dude, you thought that was a straight FoxNews article reporting on the Plame Lawsuit. and because it was on FoxNews you were crying bias. c'mon.


Psshh..no such thing. That was just his editorial from the radio show. It's mentioned right there on the top of the article. Wht's not to see in it ?

What was more irritating was the fact that it got featured prominently on Google News, as if it was a Faux News article.



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.