TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Impossible? No.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by rabbitjoker on Aug-24-2007 19:10:

Exclamation Impossible? No.


Posted by Silky Johnson on Aug-24-2007 19:11:

I concur. Someone sticky this thread.


Posted by thesauce23 on Aug-24-2007 19:16:

whhhatt?


Posted by Jem_hadar on Aug-24-2007 19:26:

Unimpoossible? Yes.


Posted by malek on Aug-24-2007 19:27:

Impossible n'est pas fran�ais.


Posted by exstasie on Aug-24-2007 19:28:

quote:
Originally posted by Jem_hadar
Unimpoossible? Yes.


??





Posted by Dr. DAS on Aug-24-2007 19:28:

Un-possible?


Posted by rabbitjoker on Aug-24-2007 19:50:

quote:
Originally posted by Dr. DAS
Un-possible?


No.


Posted by Cro_Addict on Aug-24-2007 20:09:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/365143

once there click "Play this Game"

it is awesome!


Posted by malek on Aug-24-2007 20:34:

quote:
Originally posted by Cro_Addict
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/365143

once there click "Play this Game"

it is awesome!




Access Denied (policy_denied)

Your system policy has denied access to the requested URL.

For assistance, open a case at http://itwebds for network support team.

Your request was categorized by SmartFilter as 'Entertainment/Recreation/Hobbies;Streaming Media;Sexual Materials'.
If you wish to question or dispute this result, please click here.


Posted by CAKE on Aug-24-2007 20:43:

Nothing is Impossible!


Posted by Omega_M on Aug-24-2007 20:51:

Re: Impossible? No.

quote:
Originally posted by rabbitjoker


exceptions abound.


Posted by Al on Aug-24-2007 21:08:

quote:
Originally posted by Cro_Addict
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/365143

once there click "Play this Game"

it is awesome!



damn it!!
what's the answer to #4?


Posted by Adamo on Aug-24-2007 21:12:

Impossible is nothing.


Posted by Al on Aug-24-2007 21:24:



"Nothing is impossible; there are ways that lead to everything, and if we had sufficient will we should always have sufficient means. It is often merely for an excuse that we say things are impossible."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld


Posted by Abercrombie on Aug-25-2007 00:20:

quote:
Originally posted by jeeper_095
damn it!!
what's the answer to #4?



LMAO

click the answer

obvious


Posted by beefy k on Aug-25-2007 01:19:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
??






Figured out the second one, but the first one still has me going


Posted by Abercrombie on Aug-25-2007 01:41:

quote:
Originally posted by beefy k
Figured out the second one, but the first one still has me going


I wish I could have made that chop


Posted by Cro_Addict on Aug-25-2007 02:51:

quote:
Originally posted by beefy k
Figured out the second one, but the first one still has me going


you can't figure out either one..

they are just illusions...physically impossible


Posted by Cro_Addict on Aug-25-2007 02:52:

quote:
Originally posted by Abercrombie
LMAO

click the answer

obvious


haha yeah

i got to the one where it gives you the whole alphabet and u can click on any letter...so u have to guess which one it is...hahaha


Posted by DigitalMP on Aug-25-2007 02:55:

quote:
Originally posted by Cro_Addict
you can't figure out either one..

they are just illusions...physically impossible


Not really, since a floor or wall could actually be painted so you would think you're seeing what you're seeing in those illusions, the true objects could also be painted to create that illusion.

So, the object would not be impossible, but the illusion might be.

In other words...


Posted by jchung52 on Aug-25-2007 03:03:

im impossible


Posted by Cro_Addict on Aug-25-2007 03:15:

quote:
Originally posted by DigitalMP
Not really, since a floor or wall could actually be painted so you would think you're seeing what you're seeing in those illusions, the true objects could also be painted to create that illusion.

So, the object would not be impossible, but the illusion might be.

In other words...



i am not talking about painting the object...in that case yes it would be possible but only from that one view angle..

i am saying that PHYSICALLY it is not possible to BUILD those 2 things


Posted by LKD on Aug-25-2007 14:27:

quote:
Originally posted by exstasie
??






looks like M.C. Escher got some new fans


Posted by DigitalMP on Aug-25-2007 16:56:

quote:
Originally posted by Cro_Addict
i am not talking about painting the object...in that case yes it would be possible but only from that one view angle..

i am saying that PHYSICALLY it is not possible to BUILD those 2 things


but what if they are truly built, and just painted differently?

reality vs. perception

just because you're perceiving it in one fashion, doesn't mean it's not real.

*spins your head in circles*


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.