Back to the Future Part 3. - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Chill Out Room
-- Back to the Future Part 3.

Posted by trewqy on Aug-30-2007 15:07:

Back to the Future Part 3.

Great trilogy imo..but part 3 was totally redundant imo.

In 1885 there were 2 deloreans. One was the "zapped by lightning delorean" in 1955 which happened in part 2.This delorean had the time machine computer all wacked and is faulty.

The other was the one marty brought back from 1955 which had the gas tank punctured.

Now why not just skip the whole train thingy and just patch up the gas tank and just siphon filter the gas from the "lightning delorean" and get on with it.

Time Paradox.

Posted by _Nut_ on Aug-30-2007 15:18:

too many "imo's" imo.

Posted by trewqy on Aug-30-2007 15:20:

I guess ur right.imo.

Posted by stren on Aug-30-2007 15:21:

there are more inconsistencies in the series, still its fun and I don't care

Posted by david.michael on Aug-30-2007 15:22:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
there are more inconsistencies in the series, still its fun and I don't care

+1... much of it is like that, but who cares... it's cheesy 80's fun and I love 'em.

Posted by montana on Aug-30-2007 15:46:

i always liked how the schoolteacher got all her luggage into the canyon, and in the next scene Marty & Doc is carrying them

Posted by capricorn15 on Aug-30-2007 17:11:

quote:
Originally posted by montana
i always liked how the schoolteacher got all her luggage into the canyon, and in the next scene Marty & Doc is carrying them
haha, i was watching it on tv on saturday and i only saw that part.

Posted by nchs09 on Aug-30-2007 18:01:

Re: Back to the Future Part 3.

quote:
Originally posted by trewqy
Great trilogy imo..but part 3 was totally redundant imo.

In 1885 there were 2 deloreans. One was the "zapped by lightning delorean" in 1955 which happened in part 2.This delorean had the time machine computer all wacked and is faulty.

The other was the one marty brought back from 1955 which had the gas tank punctured.

Now why not just skip the whole train thingy and just patch up the gas tank and just siphon filter the gas from the "lightning delorean" and get on with it.

Time Paradox.
yes as mentioned above, "imo" is redundancy at its best.

i must say though, how back to the future 2 ended was fantastic. when they give him the letter right after doc gets sent back into the past... and then he goes and finds the young doc who just sent him back into the future....

they dont make them like that anymore. so in conclusion 3 was the worst out of the 3, but i still find it to be worth my 2 hours of viewing.

Posted by SuspicionVandit on Aug-31-2007 00:36:

1. The OP makes sense.
2. BTTF3 was horrible.
3. Time for a prequel

Posted by tubularbills on Aug-31-2007 01:26:

quote:
Originally posted by SuspicionVandit

3. Time for a prequel

FORWARD TO THE PAST?!?!?!?!?!

Posted by yujie__ on Aug-31-2007 02:26:

Zoolander > Back to the future 3

Posted by PatMcGroin on Aug-31-2007 02:32:

LMAO! true i guess. but the reason i laugh is the fact that i was bored in class today and i saw the word "flux" on an overhead slide and instead of listening to my professor, i ran through the 3 movies in my head cuz i was so fuckin bored.

Posted by lievez on Aug-31-2007 06:23:

just finished watching them yesterday, great movies. But idd, the 3rd one is the most boring one, altough i still enjoyed it .

Also those movies were produced when no-one ask himself: "what if they do this or that...". Just take the movies as they are and enjoy them

Posted by Zharen on Aug-31-2007 08:01:

Re: Back to the Future Part 3.

Posted by stren on Aug-31-2007 08:35:

I ended up watching most of it last night too.