TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Your Favorites for the Primary
Pages (6): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »


Posted by Krypton on Oct-16-2007 16:26:

Exclamation Your Favorites for the Primary

Who is your favorite to win the 2008 Primary and Presidential Election?

For simplicities sake, I will only be listing the Republican and Democratic candidates. If you have any third party picks, by all means share it with us...

The poll will end Tuesday, March 4th, around the date when most primaries would have been voted on. After we know our final presidential candidates, we'll have a presidential poll...


Posted by ResonantDrag on Oct-16-2007 17:19:

but my primaries aren't until may!

trying to ruin the surprise?


Posted by Krypton on Oct-16-2007 17:52:

quote:
Originally posted by ResonantDrag
but my primaries aren't until may!

trying to ruin the surprise?


Ugh, well, at least half the country will have voted


Posted by ResonantDrag on Oct-16-2007 17:58:

eh... my state (NC) always goes with whatever candidate seems the most flavorless frontrunner. definitely hillary for the dems.

the repubs are a little harder to call. we won't elect a morman... or the guy with more wives than the morman. and what happened to McCain? he should be having a blast with that crap opposition. (I just don't see 'ol Ron doing anything, but he'll still have my vote)


Posted by atbell on Oct-17-2007 00:18:

My prediction is that Clinton takes down Guliani.

What I'd rather see is Obama take down Ron Paul.


Posted by Krypton on Oct-17-2007 00:21:

If Ron Paul doesn't win, my next choice would be Barack Obama.


Posted by Kapedano on Oct-17-2007 01:50:

I'm going with Ron Paul, since Republicans are weak in all sides, and plus he can challenge Hillary Clinton. Clinton will win though.


Posted by Krypton on Oct-17-2007 02:08:

LOL, libertarians representn!!


Posted by hardcore trancer on Oct-17-2007 02:10:

Ron Paul for sure.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Oct-17-2007 05:43:

Biden, Edwards, Richardson, in that order of preference.


Posted by DJ Shibby on Oct-17-2007 19:40:

Colbert.


Posted by LatinLover on Oct-18-2007 03:05:

quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
If Ron Paul doesn't win, my next choice would be Barack Obama.



WOW! How the hell can you go from Paul to Osama I mean Obama... distinctive political views there buddy Are you confused?


Posted by LatinLover on Oct-18-2007 03:06:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Biden, Edwards, Richardson, in that order of preference.


You are entitled to chose whom ever you want, but I think thats a bad decision


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Oct-18-2007 03:08:

quote:
Originally posted by LatinLover
You are entitled to chose whom ever you want, but I think thats a bad decision


And aside from their political affiliation, what do you know about any of those three?


Posted by LatinLover on Oct-18-2007 03:15:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
And aside from their political affiliation, what do you know about any of those three?


Dude they are fatally flawed IMO. Dont think only because they are democrats I have something against them To be honest with you not even the Republican candidates are convincing me at this moment.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Oct-18-2007 16:56:

quote:
Originally posted by LatinLover
Dude they are fatally flawed IMO. Dont think only because they are democrats I have something against them To be honest with you not even the Republican candidates are convincing me at this moment.



I'm just curious as to how they are "fatally flawed" in your opinion.


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Oct-18-2007 21:43:

Undecided up until today.

But thanks to Senator Dodd for standing up and putting a hold on the disgusting FISA bill that would have granted amnesty to Bush and the telecom industry for their warrantless wiretaps, he just won my vote for good.

And a little campaign donation to go with it:

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/...munity_bill.php


Posted by LatinLover on Oct-19-2007 00:44:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Undecided up until today.



Hope it stays that way


Posted by LatinLover on Oct-19-2007 00:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
I'm just curious as to how they are "fatally flawed" in your opinion.


I mean it dosent take a rocket scientist to figured that out.... Edawards? Richardson? I mean these individuals are in lala land. I mean it dosent even matter because afterall they arent going to win


Posted by Marc Summers on Oct-19-2007 00:52:

lol ron paul

just lol

I chose barack obama because he wants to reduce our nuclear stockpile, and get us out of iraq. Brave man. And, so what if he's less experienced, that just means he's less corrupt, lol. Or maybe this is just my NJ mind again.


Posted by josh4 on Oct-19-2007 01:10:

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Undecided up until today.

But thanks to Senator Dodd for standing up and putting a hold on the disgusting FISA bill that would have granted amnesty to Bush and the telecom industry for their warrantless wiretaps, he just won my vote for good.

And a little campaign donation to go with it:

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/...munity_bill.php

oh thank god, and dodd


Posted by MisterOpus1 on Oct-19-2007 04:27:

quote:
Originally posted by LatinLover
Hope it stays that way


It will. No other candidate in the Democratic party has shown 1/2 a spine as Dodd did today. Whether or not he wins the primary isn't the crux of the issue to me. His principled stance on this illegal surveillance issue won my vote, and I will hold to that vote for him as a result.

quote:
I mean it dosent take a rocket scientist to figured that out.... Edawards? Richardson? I mean these individuals are in lala land. I mean it dosent even matter because afterall they arent going to win


So because they aren't higher in the polls they are therefore "fatally flawed?" Last I checked, Edwards is still running pretty good in Iowa (1st or 2nd I believe). He's got a good shot at S. Carolina as well. I'll agree that Biden and Richardson are longshots, but I'd hardly characterize them as "fatally flawed" as a consequence.

Added in Edit: I was wrong about S. Carolina. Edwards is getting creamed there:

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/south-carolina.html

The only place he's doing okay in is Iowa:

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/iowa.html

Everywhere else he's a distant third, occasionally second.


Posted by atbell on Oct-19-2007 04:34:

quote:
Originally posted by LatinLover
I mean it dosent take a rocket scientist to figured that out.... Edawards? Richardson? I mean these individuals are in lala land. I mean it dosent even matter because afterall they arent going to win



More with the facts. "Lala land" is not specific. Give us more juicy things to talk about.

There's clearly some motivation that you've got for dismising these candidates. If you can put it down in writing you might be able to convince others to with draw thier support.

Give it a shot, even complaints about the way they dress or that they have bad breath are valid.


Posted by Lebezniatnikov on Oct-19-2007 04:37:

quote:
Originally posted by LatinLover
I mean it dosent take a rocket scientist to figured that out.... Edawards? Richardson? I mean these individuals are in lala land. I mean it dosent even matter because afterall they arent going to win



Simply because they are not frontrunners means I shouldn't support them? Tell that to everyone cheering for Ron Paul too.

I'm being honest here, I want to hear why you think Edwards and Richardson are in "lala land" as you say. If you can convince me, I will change my vote.

However, I do think it is interesting that you had nothing to say about Biden, who I would argue has shown at least as much courage as Dodd (though regretably not on FISA).


Posted by LatinLover on Oct-19-2007 23:48:

Dodd is the one that wants to grant amnesty to all illegal aliens Yeah! We should all be proud of him


Pages (6): [1] 2 3 4 5 6 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.