TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Police doing a good job or Tyrannts abusing their powers that be? You Deciede.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Police doing a good job or Tyrannts abusing their powers that be? You Deciede.
| quote: |
| "All mass movements, as one might expect, slip with the greatest ease down an inclined plane represented by large numbers. Where the many are, there is security; what the many believe must of course be true; what the many want must be worth striving for, and necessary, and therefore good. In the clamor of the many there lies the power to snatch wish fulfillments by force; sweetest of all, however, is that gentle and painless slipping back into the kingdom of childhood, into the paradise of parental care, into happy-go-luckiness and irresponsibility. All the thinking and looking after are done from the top; to all questions there is an answer; and for all needs the necessary provision is made. The infantile dream state of the mass man is so unrealistic that he never thinks to ask who is paying for this paradise. The balancing of accounts is left to a higher political or social authority, which welcomes the task, for its power is thereby increased; and more helpless the individual becomes. Wherever social conditions of this type develop on a large scale the road to tyranny lies open and the freedom of the individual turns into spiritual and physical slavery." - Carl G. Jung, The Undiscovered Self |
To tell you the truth, by law, they didn't do anything wrong. The law stipulates that police officers can use force if they fear for their life. After having shot a police officer point blank in the face, I would think they would make sure he was not able to assault anyone else. It might have been slightly excessive, but considering that in that situation they could have legally shot him, he got off easy.
no, its not police doing a good job, but that's the chance you take when you shoot someone in the face. im not going to lose any sleep over it.
cop took two bullets to the face for nothing but doing his job, dies
Carpio took some punches to the face for being a homocidal maniac, lives to tell his boys in the yard about it.
what's to think about?
question. who stabbed the 85 year old lady?
| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN but that's the chance you take when you shoot someone in the face. |
In most cases, if you have a gun at all, or injure a cop or his dog in any way, they'll probably kill you. Being roughed up is the least of your worries.
Props for shooting the piggie in the face!
This is kinda like the first murder trial my father had which he won. A security guard was confronting the unarmed client. Client felt threatened took his gun from him and blasted him in the face. Self defense not guilty! But I wish it had been a cop.
I did cringe when I saw how bad his face was,,,, but he did shoot a human in the face.........but this guy is lucky to be alive...and the fact that he killed a cop goes to show you that he is pure evil...no regards for law or human life.... he got what he deserved.
To the OP,
Are you trying to make a point here about how much authority the police has in the states? Because there are better videos to go with the quote you posted. In fact it is on youtube it is a video of an off duty police officer killing an unarmed individual in Chicago and the police officer was not guilty for manslaughter.
I think I should be able to vote for all of the first three choices. Since they were committing police brutality while torturing a murder and failing to uphold the law.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ams.rld To the OP, Are you trying to make a point here about how much authority the police has in the states? Because there are better videos to go with the quote you posted. In fact it is on youtube it is a video of an off duty police officer killing an unarmed individual in Chicago and the police officer was not guilty for manslaughter. |
Seriously if they killed him nothing would have happened to them. But yeah I still don't think that would have been right. That would simply be the way the corrupt justUS system works.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Seriously if they killed him nothing would have happened to them. But yeah I still don't think that would have been right. That would simply be the way the corrupt justUS system works. |
hispanic causing panic 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNQnqwxy9Vc
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LazFX your right, and I am always on the look out for corrupt cops man, grew up being hassled all the time and shit.... and now that this mesican gots a job, shit.. hispanic causing panic ![]() but in this case even I found no fault.. on the cops... I mean shit, in any society; that kind of aggression by a criminal in a court of law would be death. No? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Probably but I don't believe in the death penalty. Neither do I believe in the cops taking justice into their own hands. I have been physically abused by law officers before, so it is hard for me to give an unbiased opinion. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by ams.rld http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNQnqwxy9Vc |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by ams.rld What did you go? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild Probably but I don't believe in the death penalty. Neither do I believe in the cops taking justice into their own hands. I have been physically abused by law officers before, so it is hard for me to give an unbiased opinion. |
Me too. I had a guy in my house who refused to leave. I pushed him out the door and locked it. He still refused to leave and was banging on the door yelling to be let back in so I called the cops. They arrested me for assault. OH yeah and let that guy go back into my apartment and lock me out from the inside. I later had to go back with group of people and break the door down forcibly which I had to pay for.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Zild What did I do? Nothing and they don't like that. They prefer if you cooperate and acknowledge their questions etc... |
Actually I do. It is called having money and a lawyer. The only thing you are legally required to do is identify yourself. The only reason they ask you questions is to garner evidence against you.
Drug prohibition (which is technically illegal...) has now given excuse to the authorities to arm themselves with semi-automatic weapons.
You really know something BAD is on the horizon when the uneducated dope cops in your hometown are being armed with AK-47s... how the fuck does this shit keep happening?
Does no one in whatever approval process exists, if any, see how this would very easily become a dangerous thing?
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/05/cops.guns/index.html
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Shibby Does no one in whatever approval process exists, if any, see how this would very easily become a dangerous thing? |

| quote: |
| Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN yeah, i love the irony. if the second amendment was to allow for militia's to defend against the oppressor, what's really happened is given the potential oppressor more reason to oppress ![]() im sorry, but whilst i can appreciate the beauty of a constitution in the american tradition, i really think the right to bear arms has right royally fucked america. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.