Pioneer SVM-1000....seriously??? - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- DJ Booth
-- Pioneer SVM-1000....seriously???
Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Posted by Brandon H. on Nov-14-2007 22:27:

Pioneer SVM-1000....seriously???

Is this real? Pinch me

Posted by stan229 on Nov-14-2007 22:53:

theres some really cool demo videos on youtube check those out

Posted by leph555 on Nov-15-2007 02:24:

i am about to cum all over

Posted by Saint John on Nov-15-2007 03:06:

looks pretty orgy..and probably cost the same amount as an orgy

Posted by Shini on Nov-15-2007 03:17:

This thing looks insane but holy shit its big and is going to cost a fortune I bet, any one know the price tag yet?

Just out of curiosity as well, how many people here are VJs as well?

Posted by Ted Promo on Nov-15-2007 03:28:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ssvu5P1AH-I

eh, I still don't see video becoming that big in the mixing world. I tend to like it darker in a club and focusing on the music, not a video. Who knows, maybe it'll get big, the effects this thing can do to videos seems intriguing.

Posted by DjWoody on Nov-15-2007 03:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Ted Promo
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ssvu5P1AH-I

eh, I still don't see video becoming that big in the mixing world. I tend to like it darker in a club and focusing on the music, not a video. Who knows, maybe it'll get big, the effects this thing can do to videos seems intriguing.

Hahaha Video is HUGE!!!! In the mainstream clubs. I get asked for video all the time and promoters are willing to pay way more if you do video. It's only going to get bigger.

Posted by Ted Promo on Nov-15-2007 03:42:

quote:
Originally posted by DjWoody
Hahaha Video is HUGE!!!! In the mainstream clubs. I get asked for video all the time and promoters are willing to pay way more if you do video. It's only going to get bigger.

lame. I like my dark and dingy club nights. Video seems to be something you'd do when you're tripping on acid with a couple of friends.

Posted by stan229 on Nov-15-2007 04:21:

i think the MSRP is around $7000

Posted by a.chan on Nov-15-2007 04:39:

quote:
Originally posted by stan229
i think the MSRP is around $7000

Thats more than my whole setup!!

Posted by aLviNx80 on Nov-15-2007 04:50:

no thx... i would rather spend the money on something else.

Posted by Fledz on Nov-15-2007 05:34:

I've known about it for a while but never actually seen it in action until now. Looks wicked!

I'd love to play around with it.

Posted by �JD� on Nov-15-2007 06:41:

damn.. that looks sick!

Posted by nefardec on Nov-15-2007 09:46:

quote:
Originally posted by Ted Promo
lame. I like my dark and dingy club nights. Video seems to be something you'd do when you're tripping on acid with a couple of friends.

i go to a ton of dark and dingy clubs with sick video work.

but it's not really a new thing. check this out

Posted by Ryan0751 on Nov-15-2007 15:41:

Sander Kleinenberg is doing is sets with DVJ's, has custom visuals made for tracks. Adds something to the show I suppose.

Posted by DJ Manuel C on Nov-15-2007 15:44:

All I can really say to that is HOLY SHIT!!!! lol just when you think these people couldnt possibly over achieve any further, they slap you in the face with this monster. It looks very expensive (then again all their gear is pricy as hell), but you do get what you pay for! In really big venues video is a big portion of the show. But usually it is not controlled by the dj @ all! They usually just have a dvd player hooked up to some huge projector. If you're a dj who can simultaneously do both, more power to you buddy!

Posted by miamitranceman on Nov-15-2007 17:45:

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...ghlight=SVM1000

Posted by the_gamemaster on Nov-15-2007 22:12:

I still can't see the point of video DJing at all. Surely lasers are far better??

Posted by Clovis on Nov-16-2007 00:17:

This is a gimmick if there ever was one...

Posted by Ryan0751 on Nov-16-2007 00:27:

It's not for everyone, but it's not a gimmick. Think outside the (edm) box.

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
This is a gimmick if there ever was one...

Posted by Clovis on Nov-16-2007 01:36:

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan0751
It's not for everyone, but it's not a gimmick. Think outside the (edm) box.

Yes, I can't wait to see DJs putting even less effort into their mixing because they're too busy blending two shit pre-made visuals together and pretending to be that much more creative.

There are professional VJs out there who invest thousands of dollars in high-end visual mixing gear, and take their craft very seriously, who must be absolutely livid at the sight of this thing. DJ's should mix music, leave the visuals to the people who actually know what the hell they're doing...

Case in point, Tommy Lee is using/promoting this POS...

Posted by miamitranceman on Nov-16-2007 04:47:

Posted by Clovis on Nov-16-2007 06:34:

quote:
Originally posted by miamitranceman
I'd bet good money if it was A&H you would not be so opposed to a piece of gear like this.

Nah, my argument clearly doesn't have anything to do with that, and everything to do with what it is.

It detracts more than it adds imo.

Posted by aLviNx80 on Nov-16-2007 08:25:

Posted by 4clubber on Nov-16-2007 17:37:

quote:
Originally posted by Clovis
Yes, I can't wait to see DJs putting even less effort into their mixing because they're too busy blending two shit pre-made visuals together and pretending to be that much more creative.

There are professional VJs out there who invest thousands of dollars in high-end visual mixing gear, and take their craft very seriously, who must be absolutely livid at the sight of this thing. DJ's should mix music, leave the visuals to the people who actually know what the hell they're doing...

Case in point, Tommy Lee is using/promoting this POS...

I see your point that there's gonna be DJ's who think they can actually do both (mix audio and mix video) effectively at the same time but suck at it, and that can ruin some clubbing experiences. But so what. Just don't go and see those DJ's if that's the case. But what if there really are some incredibly talented people out there who can actually do both at the same time and enhance one with the other? Surely it would be better if one person with one vision for a specific mood controls the whole setting rather than one person controlling sounds and another controlling video, and the two being not really connected since the 2 people don't think alike.

I say it's good that the option is here for those people. I'm not really worried about people who will waste their money on this only to do a horrible job.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »