
TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Finally it’s here .... AMD - PHENOM (QUAD CORE)
Posted by E2EK1EL on Nov-26-2007 09:00:
Finally it’s here .... AMD - PHENOM (QUAD CORE)
AMD PHENOM 9700 QUAD CORE 2.4GHZ 4MB CACHE AM2+ 125W

http://www.pcvonline.com/productDetails.aspx?id=6456
INCREDIBLE PERFORMANCE
The ultimate megatasking experience. Featuring true multi-core design and award-winning AMD64 technology with Direct Connect Architecture, AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series processors deliver the ultimate megatasking experience by providing direct and rapid information flow between processor cores, main memory, and graphics and video accelerators. AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series processors have the technology to break through the most challenging processing loads. AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series processors feature low latency access to main memory for amazingly rapid response and phenomenal system performance. AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series processors were designed for megatasking—running multiple, multi-threaded applications. Surge through the most demanding processing loads, including advanced multitasking, critical business productivity, advanced visual design and modeling, serious gaming, and visually stunning digital media and entertainment.
Phenomenal performance with advanced processor design. The AMD Phenom™ 9000 series processors are the most advanced processors for true multitasking with true quad-core design. Don’t get bogged down by non-native quad-core processors and obsolete front side bus architectures. With an integrated memory controller and shared L3 cache, AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series processors have low-latency access to main memory for amazingly rapid system response and phenomenal system performance.
Blast through performance bottlenecks. All AMD Phenom™ 9000 series processors feature AMD64 with Direct Connect Architecture to blast through performance bottlenecks. Award winning HyperTransport™ 3.0 technology just got faster, providing support for full 1080p high-definition video and extreme total system bandwidth.
Shatter the memory barrier. Superior AMD64 architecture offers direct access to DDR2 memory. Enjoy virtually unlimited memory options with AMD64 technology and 64-bit Windows Vista.® Shatter the memory barrier with AMD Phenom™ 9000 series processors and 64-bit Windows Vista.®
INTENSELY VISUAL
Experience Windows Vista.® Harness the power of Windows Vista® with the AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series quad-core processor. The AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series quad-core processor divides and conquers the most complex tasks with true multi-core design. Enjoy the ultimate megatasking experience on Windows Vista.® Enjoy virtually unlimited memory options with AMD64 technology and 64-bit Windows Vista.® Shatter the memory barrier with AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series quad-core processors and Windows Vista.®
STRIKINGLY EFFICIENT
Strikingly efficient Cool‘n’Quiet™ 2.0 technology.With the next generation of award-winning Cool‘n’Quiet™ technology, Cool‘n’Quiet™ 2.0 technology reduces heat and noise so you can experience amazing performance without distraction. Combined with core enhancements that can improve overall power savings, the AMD Phenom™ 9000 Series quad-core processor delivers seamless multitasking and optimum energy efficiency. Work, play, talk, and share a PC that’s seen, not heard.
Purchase with Confidence
Founded in 1969, AMD has shipped more than 240 million PC processors worldwide. Customers can depend on AMD64 processors and AMD for compatibility and reliability. AMD processors undergo extensive testing to help ensure compatibility with Microsoft Windows XP, Vista, Windows NT®, Windows 2000, as well as Linux and other PC operating systems. AMD works collaboratively with Microsoft and other ecosystem partners to achieve compatibility of AMD processors and to expand the capability of software and hardware products leveraging AMD64 technology. AMD conducts rigorous research, development, and validation to help ensure the continued integrity and performance of its products.
Posted by Playa24_7 on Nov-26-2007 12:27:
Apparently it doesn't out perform Intel's chips at all, so Intel has nothing to worry about I'm sure
Posted by acid-flux on Nov-26-2007 12:32:
If you are going to get it, get the AN78. switchable bios.. 
Posted by smuncky on Nov-26-2007 13:47:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Playa24_7
Apparently it doesn't out perform Intel's chips at all, so Intel has nothing to worry about I'm sure |
exactly. intel ftw.
Posted by Orko on Nov-26-2007 15:17:
Yawn.
I am still on single core, and see no reason to change. If I want to get more work done, I'll just use two computers.
Posted by Dave Akermanis on Nov-26-2007 15:46:
| quote: |
Originally posted by smuncky
exactly. intel ftw. |
AMD Procs are better for audio production, not so much gaming though...
Posted by Orko on Nov-26-2007 15:52:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dave Akermanis
AMD Procs are better for audio production, not so much gaming though... |
How so?
Posted by SgtFoo on Nov-26-2007 17:33:
because AMD processors have been quoted to be better for floating point logic while Intels are not as good with floating point numbers.
The differences are probably so negligible though..
Posted by djbruuen on Nov-26-2007 18:06:
looks to be more expensive than the intel q6600 chip...
the whole reason why i switched to AMD 6 years back, was because they offered equivalent quality to intel for a far cheaper price. Sadly that seems to be over and i've gone back to intel.
Posted by Ozmozis on Nov-26-2007 18:11:
I have an AMD XP +2200, still works like a champ!! I've had it for 4 years...
Posted by Dave Akermanis on Nov-26-2007 18:22:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Orko
How so? |
What DeJong said...
Posted by Yohan on Nov-26-2007 18:32:
Man, I've been wondering where I've heard the term phenom before and it just hit me.
The Phenom... The Undertaker...

Posted by Jem_hadar on Nov-26-2007 19:35:
| quote: |
Originally posted by djbruuen
looks to be more expensive than the intel q6600 chip...
the whole reason why i switched to AMD 6 years back, was because they offered equivalent quality to intel for a far cheaper price. Sadly that seems to be over and i've gone back to intel. |
Ditto. Always been an AMD guy whenever I've bough a PC for this very reason, but likley with my latest to come purchase, I'll be switching over to Intel now.
Alas.
| quote: |
Originally posted by ÖZmözis
I have an AMD XP +2200, still works like a champ!! I've had it for 4 years... |
Aww. *Jealous*
The new compy I want is replacing my current AMD XP 3000+
It just isnt cutting it. Its about 3-4 years old. I last reformatted it 6-8 months ago, I defrag it at least once a month, usually ever week or 2 depending.
But shes just TOO fucking slow. My frustration point has reach a level ive decided its time to re-invest in a new, better, faster compy!
Posted by Orko on Nov-26-2007 21:25:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Jem_hadar
The new compy I want is replacing my current AMD XP 3000+
It just isnt cutting it. Its about 3-4 years old. I last reformatted it 6-8 months ago, I defrag it at least once a month, usually ever week or 2 depending.
But shes just TOO fucking slow. My frustration point has reach a level ive decided its time to re-invest in a new, better, faster compy! |
What are you doing that its so slow? How much memory do you have, and what OS are you using?
I am running an Athlon XP 2800, and I find its just fine for almost any use. Really the only thing I do not do with it now, is play games.
Posted by mnemonic. on Nov-26-2007 21:27:
yeah, wtf?
i'm on a Athlon XP 2700+ @2.16Ghz 1GB of ram, and mine runs beautifully.
Posted by zoogla on Nov-26-2007 21:35:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Jem_hadar
But shes just TOO fucking slow. |
Must be all the pr0n.
Posted by E2EK1EL on Nov-26-2007 22:53:
oh no ... seems like AMD didn't top Intel this time. (So far)
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/19/...m-intel-shrugs/
Posted by DigiNut on Nov-27-2007 01:36:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Dave Akermanis
AMD Procs are better for audio production |
No.
| quote: |
Originally posted by SgtFoo
AMD processors have been quoted to be better for floating point logic while Intels are not as good with floating point numbers. |
No.
Well, yes - they have been "quoted to be" better, but those assertions were always completely unsubstantiated.
I was an AMD fanboy for many years, but there's just no denying that the Athlon is an inferior design to the Intel Core in almost every respect. Sometimes the Athlons can keep up, but they never see more than a marginal gain over the Cores. Plus, they're much higher power, shitty if you're trying to ditch the fans.
Posted by Engine9 on Nov-27-2007 01:42:
omg fap fap fap
memory > processor speed
Posted by Surreal JRS on Nov-27-2007 01:47:
| quote: |
Originally posted by E2EK1EL
oh no ... seems like AMD didn't top Intel this time. (So far)
|
"Jochen Polster emphasised that the Phenom quad-core processor does not represent a high-end model for now. AMD plans to price the Phenom models markedly lower than Intel's quad-core models."
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11...weaves_its_web/
Posted by AustralianGQ on Nov-27-2007 03:00:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Playa24_7
Apparently it doesn't out perform Intel's chips at all, so Intel has nothing to worry about I'm sure |
ive already seen comparison charts and reviews between amd and intel. and intel still easily beats amd.
pretty sad that its a year or 2 later and amd comes out with new cpus that still fall short of intels lineup. if amd keeps this up, they will be bankrupt.
Posted by Jem_hadar on Nov-27-2007 03:07:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Orko
What are you doing that its so slow? How much memory do you have, and what OS are you using?
I am running an Athlon XP 2800, and I find its just fine for almost any use. Really the only thing I do not do with it now, is play games. |
1GB of ram
XP is the op system.
Posted by Surreal JRS on Nov-27-2007 04:15:
| quote: |
Originally posted by AustralianGQ
ive already seen comparison charts and reviews between amd and intel. and intel still easily beats amd.
pretty sad that its a year or 2 later and amd comes out with new cpus that still fall short of intels lineup. if amd keeps this up, they will be bankrupt. |
Dude, read the comment above you! 
AMD never intended nor stipulated that this chip is to compete with Intel's high end offering, and have priced it accordingly. Value wise, AMD is a good choice for a mid-range system.
Also it's worth mentioning that AMD's current offering, as well as future CPUs planned for 2009 will work on your existing AM2 or AM2+ based motherboards. Intel seems to be releasing a zillion non-forwards compatible chipsets, and even their x38 platform will be incompatible with their next gen CPUs (codename Nehalem) to be released 2nd half of next year.
Take from this what you will... If you want the most performance and have money to spend on future component upgrades, then you currently will want to go with Intel. If you are building a low to midrange system and want the most value for your money and the ability the simply pop in future CPUs into your existing AM2/AM2+ based motherboard, then go with AMD.
Posted by E2EK1EL on Nov-27-2007 05:35:
| quote: |
Originally posted by Surreal JRS
"Jochen Polster emphasised that the Phenom quad-core processor does not represent a high-end model for now. AMD plans to price the Phenom models markedly lower than Intel's quad-core models."
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11...weaves_its_web/ |
that is true ... the top of the line ver is not out. Very good point.
Posted by zoogla on Nov-27-2007 13:43:
| quote: |
Originally posted by E2EK1EL
that is true ... the top of the line ver is not out. Very good point. |
The Pope always speaks teh truth!
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.