TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- What came first, the chicken or the egg?
What came first, the chicken or the egg?

I came first...because I'm a guy, and that's what we do.

So all things being equal; The guy chicken obviously came first...and the lady chicken finished herself off with an egg-beater.......get it? Egg-"beater"?
Damn, I'm good. 
You need to further define your terms.
If by egg you mean egg in general or any type of egg then without question egg came first as there were many aquatic species that produced eggs millions of years priort to the evolution of the chicken.
If by egg you mean specifically a Chicken Egg then the chicken came first. An egg is catagorized by what produced the egg, rather than what the egg produced. This is why the eggs we generally purchase are classified as chicken/emu/duck even though they are normally unfertalized and have no potential to produce any life. Given that an egg is named for what produced the egg then a chicken egg could not exist until such time as the first chicken laid it's first egg. Since the existance of a chicken egg is impossible without the prior existance of a chicken then clearly the chicken came first.
The egg, obviously
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Capitalizt http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/ |
I would imagine that something programmed all of this craziness to be nothing but new all the time.
An algorithm that constantly pumps out ridiculous and awesome dynamic newness.
Change.
The Change Cycle. The Life Conundrum. The WTF=42 Quantum Equation.
I just took a huge hit. Rock on.
The funniest part is that the only thing that we actually know to be true is that we experience whatever it is we experience the way we experience it.
And even that breaks down with the slightest touch of random arrays of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and other goodies that might not be real at all, but sure kick a hell of a punch in the punch at the company christmas party. Whoo!!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Capitalizt http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/ |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton That article actually made me start this thread.. So where did the first chicken egg come from if there were no chickens? |
My ultimate questions...
When was the first cell split?
When was the first egg ever laid?
When was the first mammalian birth?
When did the first piece of an animal like a starfish spring forth an identical specimen?
Add a what, who, how, and why to those questions too..
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton That article actually made me start this thread.. So where did the first chicken egg come from if there were no chickens? |
How about this one?
Because an egg is nothing more than a giant single celled organism, it would have been around much longer than the chicken, since single celled organisms were the first lifeforms on the planet, and the chicken sadly only came along later.
Then again, the chicken is made up of many different types of cells, each of which is its own organism.
So I'd have to conclude that they're the same thing, so differentiation is futile.

| quote: |
| Originally posted by George Smiley Of course. What we know as chickens today must have evolved from something. When an animal evolves, it means that it has been born with some kind of mutation that its parents did not have. Therefore, when chickens were evolving, an egg must have been laid with some kind of mutation in it, and therefore, the egg was not the same animal, genetically, as its parents. Yet the eggs that the mutant chicken lays will be the same |
The test tube? 
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Krypton That article actually made me start this thread.. So where did the first chicken egg come from if there were no chickens? |
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Let me go get a quarter. We can settle this over a coin flip.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Renegade Pick a hen at random, then put it next to her mother, put the mother next to her mother and so on until you have several million consecutive chicken generations lined up. If you were to walk down that line, you would not be able to point to a definitive spot in the series where all birds after that spot are chickens and all birds before it aren't - the changes from generation to generation are far too small to allow that. The rate of genetic change between a hen and her chick are probably hundreds of times greater, on average, than the genetic changes that are actually preserved (i.e. positively selected) over time in the active germ-line. We can talk apprehensibly about "genetic trees" or "common ancestors" in the context of phylogeny, but to talk about "species" - particularly in the fixed sense that we usually use the word - makes no sense. What we could do, however, is walk down that line of chickens and identify the most recent bird to be related to every surviving chicken on the planet. For humans, this "Eve" probably lived about 60,000-100,000 years ago, but for chickens - given the shorter generational spans and the higher birth rates - this chicken "Eve" probably lived much more recently. If we say that this chicken - from which all other chickens are decended - marks the point at which chickens first came into existence (which wouldn't make a great deal of sense because as chicken generations go by that point will keep on moving further and further forward - but we'll ignore that for now) then we can say confidently that "the egg" came first, as that chicken was undoubtedly hatched from an egg. It all makes sense when you think about it: what is a chicken, after all, if not simply the disposable vessel an egg uses to produce more eggs? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Moral Hazard You need to further define your terms. If by egg you mean egg in general or any type of egg then without question egg came first as there were many aquatic species that produced eggs millions of years priort to the evolution of the chicken. If by egg you mean specifically a Chicken Egg then the chicken came first. An egg is catagorized by what produced the egg, rather than what the egg produced. This is why the eggs we generally purchase are classified as chicken/emu/duck even though they are normally unfertalized and have no potential to produce any life. Given that an egg is named for what produced the egg then a chicken egg could not exist until such time as the first chicken laid it's first egg. Since the existance of a chicken egg is impossible without the prior existance of a chicken then clearly the chicken came first. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.