TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Technology & Gadget Zone
-- LCD monitor 4:3 vs wide screen


Posted by stren on Dec-17-2007 19:57:

LCD monitor 4:3 vs wide screen

I'm not sure what to get, i was thinking 4:3 19', cause its more convenient for games. How is widescreen with games ?
i got about 480 $ to spend


Posted by Spirit5 on Dec-18-2007 00:07:

Re: LCD monitor 4:3 vs wide screen

quote:
Originally posted by stren
I'm not sure what to get, i was thinking 4:3 19', cause its more convenient for games. How is widescreen with games ?
i got about 480 $ to spend


4:3 would be ideal for games for scaling reasons, but 16:9 and 16:10 are more common (16:9 being the most common). Widescreen is not the best for games, due to scaling reasons and some don't display resolutions that are not it's native resolution....very well. Many games aren't made for widescreen, and even the newer ones that offer the resolutions offered in widescreen don't scale right (i.e. you can't see the whole screen, part of it is cut off. In FPS it's usually part of the gun/character's arm).


Posted by XaNaX on Dec-21-2007 14:32:

I would get the widescreen, $480 will get you a huge one. Another option would be dual 19" 4:3s. It wouldn't really help much for games but I have it at work and its great for everything else.


Posted by TigerClaw on Dec-22-2007 00:47:

Go with Widescreen, Many of the latest PC games right now support widescreen resolutions.


Posted by factory81 on Dec-22-2007 19:10:

No one has mentioned this but PC widescreen is actually 16:10 resolution in comparison to a T.V.'s 16:9 resolution.

Now the debate is yours as to weather you like 4:3 or 16:10 in this case.

Your 1600x1200 is now 1680x1050...how do you like 80 more pixels going left to right if you will on your monitor, and 150 less going up and down. Thus making it "wide".


It is easier to cascade windows vertically with a widescreen monitor, and you could fit ableton/reason for instance all on one screen.
If I was you I would spend $480 on (2) 22" monitors for $199 a piece.

Most everything supports 16:10 resolution for computers, but here is a drawback of purchasing anything larger then a 22" (that runs 1920x1080 that is or larger). If you play video games you tend to play in your native resolution. My 22" monitor has a native resolution of 1680x1050. Games look best at this resolution. My 8800GTS only plays the latest games (maxed visual settings) at 1680x1050 and struggles in a game or two even with that. If I was to run 1920x1080 as my native resolution (or have a 24" monitor or bigger), then I would be forced to turn down the eye candy in able to support the larger resolutions.

It is something to consider.


Posted by Spirit5 on Dec-22-2007 20:07:

quote:
Originally posted by TigerClaw
Go with Widescreen, Many of the latest PC games right now support widescreen resolutions.


They support it, but I wouldn't say they support it properly. There's still part of the screen cut off. Bioshock has this problem, UT 3 has this problem..I don't think Crysis does though.


Posted by XaNaX on Dec-23-2007 04:15:

quote:
Originally posted by factory81
If I was you I would spend $480 on (2) 22" monitors for $199 a piece.


i'd probably go this route too


Posted by stren on Dec-23-2007 16:58:

i'm sure I don't want 2 monitors, don't have that much space on my desk.
What about playing older games on wide screen ? does it stretch everything to wide screen ? or does it cut it off not displaying the sides ?


Posted by mattW on Jan-07-2008 23:43:

I suggest a 24" widescreen. I hope you have a good videocard...


Posted by stren on Jan-08-2008 08:41:

i decided on a samsung's 22' widescreen. 24 is a bit too expensive. I don't have a good video card but i will in a few months


Posted by _Nut_ on Jan-08-2008 15:11:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
i decided on a samsung's 22' widescreen. 24 is a bit too expensive. I don't have a good video card but i will in a few months


Is it the SyncMaster 226BW? I am using 2 of those at work and one at home. It is an amazing monitor


Posted by Lira on Jan-08-2008 19:05:

This thing about dual monitors is very interesting to me...

I want to get an extra monitor for this computer, but I don't know how expensive that would be =/

(I'm already using a SyncMaster 750s)


Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-08-2008 22:54:

get the widescreen. i have yet to see a modern game have issues. i read about bioshock having problems, but it looked perfect on my 16:9 television. crysis is perfect. forged alliance is perfect.


Posted by stren on Jan-08-2008 23:09:

quote:
Originally posted by _Nut_
Is it the SyncMaster 226BW? I am using 2 of those at work and one at home. It is an amazing monitor


that's the one


Posted by Blahzaay on Jan-22-2008 01:04:

I have dual 19" Widescreens. Work flow for my music makin' has increased massively but wish I had gone for dual 22".


Posted by cmay119 on Jan-27-2008 10:18:

I have a 20" widescreen monitor. Love it to death, and if a game doesn't naturally support you widescreen resolution, you can hack the game to make it support is (along with field of view as well so it's not just a stretched image to 1680x1050).

I personally wouldn't go with a 22" version of a widescreen monitor. As it is 2 more inches. However, you're still stuck with the 1680x1050 resolution. The clarity of the picture degrades expanding that resolution out 2 more inches.

I'd personally stick with 20" or move upto 24" and get 1920x1200. Full 1080p is then supported (however you'll have little black bars at the top and bottom of the screen due to the horizontal resolution being larger then 1,080 pixels.


Posted by stren on Jan-27-2008 12:49:

quote:
Originally posted by cmay119
I have a 20" widescreen monitor. Love it to death, and if a game doesn't naturally support you widescreen resolution, you can hack the game to make it support is (along with field of view as well so it's not just a stretched image to 1680x1050).


how would one do that ?

Thanks for all the info about 20' and 24' , I think i'll stick to 22' though. 24 is too expensive, and i'd rather have a bigger screen for movies


Posted by cmay119 on Feb-02-2008 03:32:

quote:
Originally posted by stren
how would one do that ?

Thanks for all the info about 20' and 24' , I think i'll stick to 22' though. 24 is too expensive, and i'd rather have a bigger screen for movies


Depends on the game actually. Some games just naturally support WS resolutions and some are really finicky about it.

A really good website to check out for that is:

www.widescreengamingforum.com

Pretty much the most dedicated site that I know of for Widescreen gaming.

Enjoy your new monitor.


Posted by stren on Feb-02-2008 09:14:

thanks a lot


Posted by archaudio on Feb-14-2008 02:18:

I have a 19" Samsung SyncMaster 940bw which is a wide screen and i love it. I also have an older crt monitor as a secondary monitor in my dual monitor set up. For gaming I don't know what would be the problem with a widescreen for gaming. I run some multimedia apps. and i screw around on the computer and i love the wide screen. It seems more natural in my line of vision. I would recommend 2 of these or bigger for doing media applications



Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.