Electronic voting fraud...Hillary might have really lost NH.

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Electronic voting fraud...Hillary might have really lost NH.

Posted by Capitalizt on Jan-10-2008 04:03:

Electronic voting fraud...Hillary might have really lost NH.

I thought there was something fishy about Hillary's 16 point overnight swing...Early comparisons of the counties where hand counting took place vs machine counting show Hillary lost handily to Obama 38%-34%
It could be a statistical fluke...but certainly warrants further investigation.
__________________________________________________

Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results
By Lori Price, www.legitgov.org

2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results --Total Democratic Votes: 286,139 - Machine vs Hand 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 39.618%
Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.908%
Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 36.309%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.617%
Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 4.709% (13,475 votes)
Obama: -2.308% (-6,604 votes)

Democratic Primary Results: hand vs paper

Both party results:
http://www.legitgov.org/nh_machine_vs_paper.html

Video showing how easily fraud is done on one of the machines used in NH

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs <---

Posted by pkcRAISTLIN on Jan-10-2008 04:10:

machine voting is terrible.

Posted by Q5echo on Jan-10-2008 04:32:

the Daily Kossaks are eating their own over this one. sad.

DEIBOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i thought electronic voter fraud only applied to Republicans?

this is a polling pheonomenon, not a voting one. combine that with the way NH releases it's election results and this is what you get.

Posted by Krypton on Jan-10-2008 04:45:

Machines are too corruptible...

Posted by DJ Shibby on Jan-10-2008 06:48:

The media is keeping us riled up by imbeding this idea of a death match between Obama and Hillary to the forefront of everything "News". They created this and control it, airwaves are something else, and they don't even need air these days.

I do like how they've basically eliminated the republican competition from this election by creating the illusion that only Hillary and only Obama matter as if only they are running.

Of course, the whole thing is such a broken game at this point that I just don't know what to say anymore. I wish I could believe that it's a necessary evil to move toward the progression of better things, even if it requires the wrong methods... but its nothing more than a cop out, a way to relieve us of responsibility of what it means to be a democracy, or to be a human being.

We've got enough things to deal with, flying on this spinning rock through the cosmos and staring down the barrel of an entropic barrage of unknowns. I guess this is why we keep allowing these things to happen, backlashing only when we've been illuminated to just how badly our emotions are being puppeteered, and by masterless puppets no less.

Posted by Arbiter on Jan-10-2008 07:01:

The hand-counted votes are small in number and overrepresent small towns of less than 750 votes by an extreme margin. That's a specious accusation if I've ever seen one.