TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Producers Promotion
-- Rinster - Euphoric Journey Through Mind And Body [Trance] - [LOOKING FOR LABEL!!]
Rinster - Euphoric Journey Through Mind And Body [Trance] - [LOOKING FOR LABEL!!]
Rinster - Euphoric Journey Through Mind And Body (Original Mix)
Hey all, 
I havent posted a tune in quite a while.. here i proudly present my new trance tune. have been working on it for days/weeks and would really like to hear some feedback on this one! feedback will be returned. soon coming up a "Chris Crossland Remix" of "Euphoric Journey Through Mind And Body".
The original mix is looking for a label at the moment. so if there are any labels interested in signing this tune please contact me.
here by enclosed a 128Kbps version of the tune.
[[ LINK REMOVED ]]
Thanks everybody!
greetings,
Rinster. 
64 kbps? are you having a laugh?
i wouldnt even waste my time downloading this.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sterilis 64 kbps? are you having a laugh? i wouldnt even waste my time downloading this. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nightshift thats not very nice... |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sterilis have you ever listened to something at that bitrate? |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nightshift of course i have. but its not like it sends you deaf man. all im tryna say is u coulda been a lil more polite about it and asked him to post up a higher bitrate version. I understand what he's doing. He doesnt want someone to steal the track and try and demo it so he uses lower bitrates. You act like his track is worthless jsut because of the bitrate. But to Rinster: could you post please up at least a 128kbps version? I am quite the audiophile myself and dont like really hearing anything below 192kbps |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Nightshift of course i have. but its not like it sends you deaf man. all im tryna say is u coulda been a lil more polite about it and asked him to post up a higher bitrate version. I understand what he's doing. He doesnt want someone to steal the track and try and demo it so he uses lower bitrates. You act like his track is worthless jsut because of the bitrate. But to Rinster: could you post please up at least a 128kbps version? I am quite the audiophile myself and dont like really hearing anything below 192kbps |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sterilis anyone who produces or dj's knows you cant analyze a track that low in bitrate. you wouldnt even be able to hear most of the sounds never mind try and find a suitable label. i post samples on here at 192 or full tracks at 128. tracks get stole regardless whether you post them on a forum or not. so many tracks have been imitated after release. and besides i dont really think there are that many people out there ready to pounce and steal a track from an unknown producer. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rinster well not really "Unknown".. Armin Van Buuren played my track "Out The Water" on ASOT 307.. and so did Markus Schulze & Dj Amps from Amplified Digital etc.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sterilis still unknown mate. your not known cus armin plays your tune. you dont become properly known until your releasing cracking tunes consistently. can take years. i mean id stay 99.9% of people who heard your name would say nah never heard of him. im not being a **** its just the way it is. and how many people do you know on this forum who post their tracks here have had them stole? how do you steal it anyway by copying the melody? happens all the time. its part and partial of the industry. |
has a good arrangment and nice sounds going on. im listening in headphones but it sounds like it needs more low end. lacks some warmth.
im not liking the progression when it kicks in at 0:54. id have a look at that and change it. i would even have the same chord playing for 3 bars then mix it up on the fourth. again it lacks something when it kicks in after the breakdown.
im not feeling the melody. it isnt catchy enough. the track is definately missing a hook.
the kick and percussion all sounds fine. the bass needs more low end. melody needs improvement. sounds are nice but a bit more work is needed before a label will consider it.
good luck!
| quote: |
| Originally posted by sterilis has a good arrangment and nice sounds going on. im listening in headphones but it sounds like it needs more low end. lacks some warmth. im not liking the progression when it kicks in at 0:54. id have a look at that and change it. i would even have the same chord playing for 3 bars then mix it up on the fourth. again it lacks something when it kicks in after the breakdown. im not feeling the melody. it isnt catchy enough. the track is definately missing a hook. the kick and percussion all sounds fine. the bass needs more low end. melody needs improvement. sounds are nice but a bit more work is needed before a label will consider it. good luck! |
has about 4 in it.. what kind of melody improvement would you suggest, and please tell me what lacks at your mentioned 0:54. cheers man.
0:54 you have the bass chord progression which sounds quite amatuerish and not catchy at all. i like the track how it starts. i mean carry that on until 0:30 then id like the kick come in. at 0:54 id have a ripping arped bassline similar to marcel woods. would make the track much catchier and rocking.
melody at 2:30 sounds ok id try and develop that further. turn it into something emotional then add your pads etc.
im not feeling the melodies after the breakdown either. just isnt doing anything for me. once the track is over i cant remember much about it apart from the bassy synth.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rinster well not really "Unknown".. Armin Van Buuren played my track "Out The Water" on ASOT 307.. and so did Markus Schulze & Dj Amps from Amplified Digital etc.. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Mr.Mystery The original mix? As for the track itself: Being a percussion freak I couldn't help but to notice most of your percs sound like they're loops. There are no fills/variations and they sound very... processed (for a lack of a better word, I can't really describe it). The track seems to have some sort of an identity crisis. The opening and the drum/perc section make it seem like it wants to be a techy/harder track but then the break comes and that fluffy riff combined to the ugly saw pretty much ruins all that. You really need to get rid of that saw and focus more on that fluffy riff thing. I would also have to agree on the lack of low-end other people mentioned, the kick in particular seems to get lost in the mix. Also, some of the hihats are just way too loud... and I really doubt that's an encoding issue. All in all, this track kinda left me confused. The opening suggests this could actually be something but then it doesn't really go anywhere. While not being bad, it doesn't really have anything that would make you remember it either. It just kinda goes past you unnoticed. |
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rinster really appreciate you for posting a review like this. ill see what i can do about that saw in the breakdown.. maybe i should make a whole new intro? i actually quite like it like this.. what else could i do to the track to give it more low end? a 2nd bassline? or maybe just a bass boost? i think maybe the background melodies in the climax are a bit to soft maybe i should turn them up a bit. really interesting post man. tnx |
Not really my style but will comment anyway.
I'm not too fond of the beginning. the bass sounds a little muddy and boomy.
i like the second part of the song a bit more though
keep working
Rinster, diggin' the beats. Needs some percussion fills, as has been stated already.
Some low-mid range fast-attack fast-decay would be nice to have dancing around in the mix.
But man, that lead. It hits that blue note and throws me off a bit. The sound you're using for it is a bit lonely. Perhaps some longer notes and toying around with filters to give it some motion might be nice.
Adios.
Rinster you're wrong about that btw..
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Takkra Rinster you're wrong about that btw.. |
I'm not feeling it man, sorry. The arrangement works mechanically imo, but for me, nothing sticks out.
My ears are wanting to hear something from the low end for this song also.
It's pretty good, I think the breakdown should do something a bit different as it just plays the same melody that goes throughout?!
ps i like the start its cool!
Cool Suff mann, i like it hehe, ure getting better and better, i see that in your tunes - as long as youre progressing further its good hehehe - i would try improve your buildup a little after the break ends and i know i listened 128 quality, but still i can hear some leads too weak, try boost them a bit so they can be felt in the track properly cause they are good! nice job mann
Crawer
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Rinster About what? .. |
It does hit a dodgy note just one semi tone off. It doesn't fit the key. All round good tune but like Mystery said, nothing stands out. I think after the break, the main lead should come back super distorted with automated filters and verb compression and it'll just blow everyone away. The first few seconds I believe promises a much techier development.
Professional sounding
Cheers
-K
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.