TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- Why The Democrats Can Enter The General Elections Divided
Why The Democrats Can Enter The General Elections Divided
Okay... As we all know on Super tuesday Obama surpassed the expectations of many analyst and performed well, maybe we can all agree that Obama was the true winner in Super tuesday.
Its too close to call the Dem race. Its a high possibility that Hillary and Barrack can go to the Dem convention without having the necessary delegates to win the nomination and it can all go down to the Super delegates.... that does that mean? All the high profile politicians and lawmakers will decided on who will be the nominee to represent their party for the general election. So we will see that both candidates, Obama and Clinton would need to compromise. This is truly bad news for the Dem party, because not democratic voters decide who will be the nominee, but politicians and lawmakers
We all know if it comes down to this, the loser will have a sour taste on their mouth because they really didnt "lose" and if it comes down to this I think Obama has an edge over Hillary. Many lawmakers are for Obama and certainly dont want a Clinton back in power. I think Keneddy, Kerry, Gore, Carter ( one of the most prominent voices of the party) will agree with me.
Re: Why The Democrats Can Enter The General Elections Divided
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LatinLover Okay... As we all know on Super tuesday Obama surpassed the expectations of many analyst and performed well, maybe we can all agree that Obama was the true winner in Super tuesday. Its too close to call the Dem race. Its a high possibility that Hillary and Barrack can go to the Dem convention without having the necessary delegates to win the nomination and it can all go down to the Super delegates.... that does that mean? All the high profile politicians and lawmakers will decided on who will be the nominee to represent their party for the general election. So we will see that both candidates, Obama and Clinton would need to compromise. This is truly bad news for the Dem party, because not democratic voters decide who will be the nominee, but politicians and lawmakers We all know if it comes down to this, the loser will have a sour taste on their mouth because they really didnt "lose" and if it comes down to this I think Obama has an edge over Hillary. Many lawmakers are for Obama and certainly dont want a Clinton back in power. I think Keneddy, Kerry, Gore, Carter ( one of the most prominent voices of the party) will agree with me. |
Re: Re: Why The Democrats Can Enter The General Elections Divided
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov A. Hillary has the edge in superdelegates as of right now. B. I'm not so sure we won't have a nominee by mid-March. C. How are the Dems in worse shape than the Republicans? McCain got boo'ed yesterday at the Conservative Political Action Convention, and James Dobson just endorsed Huckabee. You can write him off as a religious nut if you'd like, but he has a lot of sway among the 30 million evangelical voters that voted for Bush in '04. |
He is not going to win
Nor I expect him to be the VP, i could be worng. my sources tell me that the governor of florida, charlie crist is in the short list of candidates for VP. He is my governor, I think that well put it this way... not so good
but just notice that he has followed McCain all over after the FL primaries took place
Re: Re: Why The Democrats Can Enter The General Elections Divided
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov A. Hillary has the edge in superdelegates as of right now. B. I'm not so sure we won't have a nominee by mid-March. C. How are the Dems in worse shape than the Republicans? McCain got boo'ed yesterday at the Conservative Political Action Convention, and James Dobson just endorsed Huckabee. You can write him off as a religious nut if you'd like, but he has a lot of sway among the 30 million evangelical voters that voted for Bush in '04. |
Re: Re: Re: Why The Democrats Can Enter The General Elections Divided
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LatinLover 1. Please confirm your source that Hillary has an edge in superdelagates? (please not a phony article by some writer) |
| quote: |
| 2. I expect for hillary to win by the time she reaches the convention |
| quote: |
3. Did I ever say that the Dems are in a worse shape than the republicans? |
| quote: |
Clearly if you ACTUALLY understand political strategy you know that McCain has 1. enough time to win over conservatives 2. he will have IMO even Romney support McCain ( so we wont be portrait as a sore loser, since Romney presidential ambitions dont end in this election) 3. believe it or nor some people might not like him within his own party, but you would see many of them rallying up for him in the general, even the most conservatives |
| quote: |
So what if Huckabee has gotten endorse by this pastor? |
It's hard not to lol at this if you're a Dem:
| quote: |
| Ann Coulter wasn't officially invited to speak at this year's Conservative Political Action Conference -- many on the right were still upset at the bad publicity she brought last year after calling John Edwards a "******." But to no one's surprise, she showed up anyway, commandeering the spotlight. Speaking before the Young America's Foundation, who invited her over CPAC's objections, the conservative author spent most of her time viciously attacking her party's new presumptive presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain. No topic was out of bounds, including the five years McCain spent as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. "I know that [he was a POW]," Coulter declared, "because he mentions it more often than Kerry mentions he was in Vietnam. There were hundreds of POWs and we are not going to make all of them president. Can't we find a POW who doesn't want to shut down Guantanamo." That was mild. Take Coulter's rationale for supporting Sen. Hillary Clinton's candidacy over McCain's: "A serious case could be made to support Hillary Clinton," she declared, offering the analogy of Winston Churchill backing Stalin in the fight against Hitler in WWII. "I'm not equating Hillary Clinton to Stalin, and if I did I apologize to Stalin's decedents... I'm not comparing McCain to Hitler. Hitler had a coherent tax policy." Later, she added, "The only way I can promise that I won't vote for Hillary Clinton is if John McCain appoints her as his vice president." Remarkably, Coulter's comments reflected what conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh predicted would be the reception McCain would receive from the antagonistic mainstream media. "Once [McCain]'s got this sewn up you're going to see the Drive-By Media start doing stories on his age, and they're not going to be mean, they are not going to be vicious, they're going to be almost sorrowful," said Limbaugh. "I am telling you, if that doesn't work, they're going to go after this age business, and they'll do it almost regretfully." And indeed, Coulter speech contained repeated subtle and not so subtle digs at McCain's age. "He has been in the Senate for about 100 years," she said (he's actually 71), long enough "to vote on the Spanish-American War." She even declared, playing off the mutual admiration between McCain and the media, that "[he] is working for the New York Times obituary." Coulter ripped him over policy issues as well, taking on his signature legislation McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform, as well as his vote against President Bush's tax cuts, and his stance on climate change. In the process, she contrasted the Arizona Republican with the GOP candidates that he bested for the presidential nomination. "McCain and [Mitt] Romney are mirror opposites of one another," said Coulter. "Romney is a conservative who had to win votes from liberals in Massachusetts. McCain is a liberal who had to win votes from conservatives in Arizona." As for former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani: He "enthusiastically supported torturing terrorists," she said to great applause. "McCain hysterically opposes dripping water down the terrorist's noses." And what if the unthinkable happens, and President McCain is inaugurated? I've led an impeachment movement before, Coulter said, and "I can lead another one." |
Your future is deportation back to Mexico either way, so what's the difference which party gets precedence in this years publicity contest?
Obama is up in 6 of the next 7 contests:
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpo..._guide_to_3.php
He's up 19 in Maryland and an unexpected 20 in Virginia (most people figured VA would go to Hillary). And in DC... well, let's just say polling would be a waste of time.
This could give Obama a huge bump going into the high profile contests in Ohio and Pennsylvania, where conventional wisdom suggests Hillary holds an advantage.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Shibby Your future is deportation back to Mexico either way, so what's the difference which party gets precedence in this years publicity contest? |
But does that mean if they have to chose between McCain or Hillary or Obama they are going to vote for the democratic candidate?
NO! As I said McCain has more than enough time to win over the conservatives and people like Romney, Gingrich, Huckabee ( which basically he is out of the race) Paul, are going to rally up for him.
and NO! that is not going to help huckabee win the nomination. MATHEMATICALLY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, HE IS OUT!!!
That endorsement can just help up boost his VP nomination. Thats it! But for this primary it is irrelevant. I Think that Romney has a chance in taking the VP spot to please conservatives
| quote: |
| Originally posted by LatinLover Since when do American citizens get deported? Lebezniatnikov all i got to say is that you are wrong in everything you are saying. I mean all conservatives just hate the fact that McCain has reached out to the other side on controversial issues But does that mean if they have to chose between McCain or Hillary or Obama they are going to vote for the democratic candidate? NO! As I said McCain has more than enough time to win over the conservatives and people like Romney, Gingrich, Huckabee ( which basically he is out of the race) Paul, are going to rally up for him. Yes I know who that pastor is and NO! that is not going to help huckabee win the nomination. MATHEMATICALLY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, HE IS OUT!!! That endorsement can just help up boost his VP nomination. Thats it! But for this primary it is irrelevant. I Think that Romney has a chance in taking the VP spot to please conservatives |
Going for nine wins in a row... the tide is turning.
| quote: |
| Obama Wins Maine By Large Margin, Signaling Dark Stretch Ahead For Hillary Camp By Greg Sargent - February 10, 2008, 6:07PM CNN and MSNBC have just called Maine for Obama, giving him another sizable victory in a state that was supposed to act as a check on his momentum after yesterday's trio of landslide wins. Instead, tonight's outcome gave him another burst of forward motion in a month that's shaping up as a very dark one indeed for Hillary. With 70% reporting, Obama had 58% to Hillary's 41%. The surprisingly big victory for Obama came on the same day as the Hillary campaign signaled a recognition of its travails by announcing a shuffling of their inner circle, replacing campaign manager and longtime loyalist Patti Solis Doyle with longtime Hillary confidant Maggie Williams. Obama's victory effectively left Hillary advisers grappling with the possibility that the worst case scenario that they'd been anticipating for some time could come true: The prospect of no victories for the whole month of February. This coming Tuesday, Obama could very well sweep the Potomac Primary -- Virginia, Maryland, and Washington, D.C. Obama's prospects are also pretty good in Wisconsin a week later, because he can run especially well in two major Dem strongholds, the left-wing college town of Madison and the urban center of Milwaukee, as well as in other locales. That leaves the Hillary campaign potentially staring across a bleak February landscape all the way to March 4th for a real shot at turning the narrative of the race around -- a grim set of circumstances that Hillary advisers have been anticipating for some time. Time and again in this race, though, Hillary has had her back to the wall, only to find that the female vote, perhaps driven by the sight of Hillary on the verge of defeat, has rallied around her and changed the story-line of the race. Women helped drive her surprise victory in New Hampshire, and were an instrumental part of her winning coalition of female, Latino, working class and older voters that propelled her to key victories in big states on Feb. 5th. The question now is how strong Hillary's coalition will prove in March, in the face of whatever momentum Obama builds coming out of what are expected to be repeated victories throughout the rest of the month. Of course, it's perfectly possible that whatever momentum he has, the proportional system will ensure that this race grinds on all the way until the convention. Advisers from both campaigns have predicted this outcome. And super-delegates are another wild card. Which is to say, as big as Obama's victory was tonight and yesterday, and while he's in a strong position, it's still anyone's guess how this comes out. |
Ann Coulter should be sent to Guantanamo and locked up.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by Clovis Ann Coulter should be sent to Guantanamo and locked up. |
Because the Republicans helped galvanize our nation's new generation onto the idea of complete and utter division, and the Democrats sealed the deal.
We've made a weapon.
| quote: |
| Originally posted by DJ Shibby Because the Republicans helped galvanize our nation's new generation onto the idea of complete and utter division, and the Democrats sealed the deal. We've made a weapon. |
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.