TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- what are some edm artist that are respected by the underground and the mainstream.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by 16YearOlTerror on Feb-10-2008 13:02:

what are some edm artist that are respected by the underground and the mainstream.

i think thers only a few out there.

ill name 1..

pryda


Posted by sleepydragon on Feb-10-2008 13:06:

is that possible? people that like more underground tend to hate on mainstream stuff.


Posted by 16YearOlTerror on Feb-10-2008 13:09:

i think there is a few out there that are respected by both.


Posted by Ian on Feb-10-2008 13:20:

Re: what are some edm artist that are respected by the underground and the mainstream

quote:
Originally posted by 16YearOlTerror
i think thers only a few out there.

ill name 1..

pryda






quality thread again.

But, on topic it depends what you mean by underground, cos as a rule anything that is liked by a single person of the 'mainstream' is then hated by the 'underground' people who often aren't nearly as underground as they'd like to think they are.


Posted by GoSpeedGo! on Feb-10-2008 13:21:

Define underground/mainstream.


Posted by Jarvmeister on Feb-10-2008 13:37:

About 9 or 10 years ago, Paul van Dyk had massive respect across the board. There wasn't such a mainstream scene as such, so the extremes weren't so far apart anyway.

These days the mainstream might just as well be in the same league as your regular pop star. Those that remain 'underground' are so far apart in what they do, and more importantly WHY they do it, that you could pretty much say that they are part of something entirely different. In that respect I don't think you can really say one DJ can belong in both categories.

I saw it all going wrong when Pringles started giving away holidays to Ibiza on the back of their cans back in 2000. I knew it was all going down the pan then...............


Posted by Zak McKracken on Feb-10-2008 13:39:

oliver lieb, liam howlett, moby


Posted by rawbound on Feb-10-2008 14:02:

perhaps trentem�ller? i dunno.


Posted by a98 on Feb-10-2008 14:12:

oliver lieb ain't respected by the mainstream, but liam is a good example i think

also maybe aphex twin and massive attack, though they don't quite fall into the dance part in edm..


Posted by SMC on Feb-10-2008 14:37:

William Orbit, Jacques Lu Cont.


Posted by noikeee on Feb-10-2008 15:14:

Daft Punk and Underworld.


Posted by Zak McKracken on Feb-10-2008 15:37:

quote:
Originally posted by a98
oliver lieb ain't respected by the mainstream, but liam is a good example i think

depends on what mainstream we talk about, do we talk about mainstream edm (avb, tiesto etc) or just mainstream (mtv,viva). of course u dont hear oliver lieb on mtv but u find oliver lieb tracks in all djs playlist the last 10 years almost no mather what genre we talk about within edm and who can forget utah saints - last vaugness?

btw chemical brothers and fatboy slim


Posted by RJT on Feb-10-2008 17:01:

I hear Dubfire is pretty underground.


Posted by wotyzoid on Feb-10-2008 17:09:

quote:
Originally posted by noikeee
Daft Punk and Underworld.


perfect examples, imho.


Posted by Sykonee on Feb-10-2008 17:12:

quote:
Originally posted by RJT
I hear Dubfire is pretty underground.




Really, anyone who's produced a Madonna track.


Posted by maluco on Feb-10-2008 17:44:

Respected by who?

Because edm fans of mainstream generally don't knows fuck about whats good in underground, and fans of underground generally hates or don't cares about mainstream.

Obviously if you says, a bunch of underground and mainstream loves Daft Punk, but they're neither or totally, IMO.


Posted by SYSTEM-J on Feb-10-2008 18:02:

There used to be loads, such as Leftfield, Orbital, The FSOL... all 90s acts and a lot of them split up now. Most of the names mentioned here, such as Underworld, Daft Punk and the Chems, are also 90s acts still going. Back in the 90s it was quite common for electronic acts to have underground acclaim and still sell records.

These days I think there's a real dichotomy between "mainstream" and "underground". The music deliberately segregates itself, which I think is a fucking terrible thing. You won't be able to name many new acts that cross-over like the ones above.


Posted by RJT on Feb-10-2008 18:14:

quote:
Originally posted by SYSTEM-J

These days I think there's a real dichotomy between "mainstream" and "underground". The music deliberately segregates itself, which I think is a fucking terrible thing. You won't be able to name many new acts that cross-over like the ones above.


This is a great point indeed, it's very strange because it wasn't until very recently that I kind of began hearing a lot of kids out at clubs refer to music they hear out in terms that were in binary opposition with one another, specifically "commercial" vs. whichever adjective you want to use for "non-commercial" (underground, alternative, etc.).

Unfortunately I think a lot of that has to do with the snobby techno/"commercial EDM" dichotomy (at least here in the States), because you really do have parties where there's great music but it is a bunch of people just hanging out, listening to what usually amounts to little more than nice background music (a set I think I have to include myself in), and for some reason this crowd generally feels as though they "won't" have any fun at the more "commercial" events.

Conversely you have the set that is relatively unabashed about their tastes and genuinely enjoy going out and reaching for the lasers week in and week out - many of whom seem to feel that the kind of music you can relax out at a club and listen to while simultaneously having a conversation with your friends is nothing more than snobby techno, so boring that how could anyone enjoy hearing it at a club?

So neither set winds up going out to the others club nights for nothing more than being stubborn and the dickhead battle continues in a fashion similar (but much "wussier" and lame than) the 90's East Coast/West Coast hip hop battle.

I hate it.


Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Feb-10-2008 18:27:

Aphex Twin
Squarepusher
Boards of Canada
Autechre

I don't know how much "dance" applies to those guys, though.


Posted by humilis on Feb-10-2008 19:54:

KLF?


Posted by nefardec on Feb-10-2008 20:33:

i have to agree about daft punk and underworld


underground however is very relative


it seems to me that you (OP) haven't seen how deep underground can actually go



there are a lot of people who can't give a shit about pryda


Posted by iammesol on Feb-10-2008 20:33:

quote:
Originally posted by nefardec
there are a lot of people who can't give a shit about *insert music here*


Posted by Project-K on Feb-10-2008 20:39:

Fluke, Moby, The Prodigy, FSOL, Aphex Twin, Squarepusher, Amon Tobin, and probably a bunch of others I can't think of. I prefer to define them as "mainstream acts that don't suck".


Posted by hkaliher on Feb-10-2008 20:43:

well anyone who is underground and stays true to their roots would fit the bill i would say
the main reason underground fans lose their interest once an artist goes big is they tend to 'sell out'


Posted by TranceArmstrong on Feb-10-2008 21:05:

Boards of Canada, maybe LCD Soundsystem


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.