TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Canada - Toronto & Southern Ont.
-- Help with new dSLR
Pages (2): [1] 2 »


Posted by Oldman1313 on Feb-14-2008 21:25:

Help with new dSLR

I am taking two extensive trips to Hawaii and Europe over the next couple of months so I decided to go ahead and purchase a new dSLR (Olypmus Evolt E-510 with 14-42mm and 40-150mm lens) without knowing much at all about these types of cameras. Part from about a week of reading reviews and reasons why or why not to buy one, I have no prior knowledge. I leave in a week and plan on trying to accomplish as much learning as I can. I know there are some people with photography knowledge on these boards, so Im just looking for some help with a nice place to start. Any recommended literature that I should be reading or beginner websites to check out, any things you would like to tell me, should I buy a MACRO lens before I leave, etc. Im looking forward to a fun future with my new camera,Thanks for any help!


Posted by eRRaTiK on Feb-14-2008 21:30:

Don't waste your money on a macro lens unless you intend on doing something with your shots. It's added weight and unnecessary if you're not a real hardcore photography addict or making some cash out of your shots.

I suggest you read up on the following topics:

- exposure
- ISO
- aperture / f-stop
- depth of field
- lighting

If you have a firm understanding on those topics I think you'll be able to maximise the shots you take, and actually take less because you're thinking about your shots beforehand.

I think http://www.dpreview.com/ has some of this info. There are websites for a lot of this stuff. Just google. No need to waste money on a book, as they go out of date pretty much before they get printed anyway.

Oh and really familiarise yourself with your camera manual. I'm still working through the functions on my own camera (Canon EOS 400D).

oh yeah, get yourself a flickr.com account. It's free, you can upload your pics to share with friends/family, and you'll find community boards on there with lots of info. If you use facebook there are photography groups there too.


Posted by djbruuen on Feb-14-2008 21:46:

Buy THIS book!

If you have enough time to read it through (and its an enjoyable read as well) you'll definitely be taking better pictures on your trip with a much better understanding of how everything works.

edit: i wouldn't bother with a macro lens either, for a good one it'll be a lot of money for a very specific form of photography, so unless you're rich, don't bother. Look into a Prime lens. Although it doesn't have zoom, the quality of your photos will we far superior to one with a large range.


Posted by chinamon on Feb-14-2008 21:47:

i wouldnt spend the extra money on a macro lens if i wasnt planning on doing any macro photography. a standard zoom will do the job just fine.


Posted by mnemonic. on Feb-15-2008 03:54:

basically listen to chinamon, djbruuen, and malek, and you'll be fine.

oh and the guy on here who uses an olympus DSLR, forget his name though.


Posted by malek on Feb-15-2008 04:04:

start by returning your olympus and get yourself a real dslr--> canon

/end of canon fan boi


are you planning to shoot insects and flowers? or hot chicks on the sand?

if the later, you don't need a macro lense, but only rubbers.


Posted by jchung52 on Feb-15-2008 04:26:

quote:
Originally posted by MikeyN

oh and the guy on here who uses an olympus DSLR, forget his name though.


otis


Posted by djbruuen on Feb-15-2008 14:07:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
start by returning your olympus and get yourself a real dslr--> canon

/end of canon fan boi


are you planning to shoot insects and flowers? or hot chicks on the sand?

if the later, you don't need a macro lense, but only rubbers.


I'm still hoping to make an upgrade soon. The choices: Rebel XTi, (the new) Rebel XSi, or 40D. (i'm most curious how the XSi will stack up to the 40D)


Posted by Oldman1313 on Feb-15-2008 18:34:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
start by returning your olympus and get yourself a real dslr--> canon

/end of canon fan boi


are you planning to shoot insects and flowers? or hot chicks on the sand?

if the later, you don't need a macro lense, but only rubbers.


well I bought the olypmus because I got a great deal and even though I dont know to much about it, the Live View caught my eye.

Anyone know the pros/cons about this 4/3 system?


Posted by Shaya007 on Feb-15-2008 23:38:

quote:
Originally posted by malek
start by returning your olympus and get yourself a real dslr--> canon



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Posted by zack3082 on Feb-19-2008 21:36:


Posted by chinamon on Feb-19-2008 21:47:

quote:
Originally posted by zack3082


cool shot. starlight filter?


Posted by zack3082 on Feb-19-2008 22:22:

no filter, no photoshop


tripod and my head


Posted by chinamon on Feb-19-2008 22:44:

quote:
Originally posted by zack3082
no filter, no photoshop


tripod and my head


interesting. so that photo is 100% untouched? thats how the photo looked when it was still on your flash memory?


Posted by zack3082 on Feb-19-2008 23:54:

110% straight off the camera.

im good at night photography


Posted by Shaya007 on Feb-20-2008 01:43:

good or no good that has got to be a filter..lol!


Posted by jchung52 on Feb-20-2008 02:58:

or its realllllllyy realllllllly slow moving water


Posted by djbruuen on Feb-20-2008 02:58:

quote:
Originally posted by Shaya007
good or no good that has got to be a filter..lol!


not necessarily, with a long exposure, that effect on the water can naturally be created, and the surrounding lighting could provide additional effects to the photo.


Posted by Shaya007 on Feb-20-2008 03:01:

quote:
Originally posted by djbruuen
not necessarily, with a long exposure, that effect on the water can naturally be created, and the surrounding lighting could provide additional effects to the photo.


I agree with everything, except the light itself. I counted 14 stars..lol!



but it's a great shot!


Posted by djbruuen on Feb-20-2008 03:03:

actually thats true, i overlooked what chinamon said about the starlight filter.


Posted by chinamon on Feb-20-2008 03:19:

quote:
Originally posted by djbruuen
actually thats true, i overlooked what chinamon said about the starlight filter.


exactly. no normal lens will every create a starlight effect without a filter. if there is then the lens was made defective with a starlight filter glass. lol.


Posted by malek on Feb-20-2008 03:32:

you don't need the star light filter to do that.

its a long exposure shot.


Posted by zack3082 on Feb-20-2008 03:46:

haha
so ive spent the last 2 years doing photography and you are telling me that im using a filter?

its a 35 sec exposure.
ill post moer images when i get off work but here is one of the websites that is seling my stuff..

http://downtownmakeover.com/downtow...ery_surreal.asp


Posted by zack3082 on Feb-20-2008 03:46:

haha
so ive spent the last 2 years doing photography and you are telling me that im using a filter?

its a 35 sec exposure.
ill post moer images when i get off work but here is one of the websites that is seling my stuff..

http://downtownmakeover.com/downtow...ery_surreal.asp


Posted by malek on Feb-20-2008 03:58:

don't quote me on that, but the number of spikes on a star indicates the number of blades on your lense diaphgrame.


Pages (2): [1] 2 »

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.