History...ain't it a *******. - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Political Discussion / Debate
-- History...ain't it a *******.

Posted by Shakka on Mar-03-2008 15:53:

History...ain't it a *******.

I get these daily missives. Today's was rather amusing/interesting.

quote:
On this day in 1877, Congress accepted the report of a special electoral commission and not a moment too soon. And thus, the nation finally discovered who would be sworn in as President of the U.S. the very next day.

The Presidential election the previous November had been one of the most contentiously disputed in American history. The Democrat, Samuel Tilden, the Governor of N.Y., had gotten over a quarter million more popular votes than Rutherford B. Hayes, his Republican opponent. But to win Tilden needed 185 electoral votes. Everyone agreed he had 184. But nineteen more of his votes from several southern states seemed to be in dispute. Particularly there was a problem in Florida and Oregon - wudja believe it? Would the Republicans finally lose the White House for the first time since Lincoln?

To resolve the dispute, Congress appointed a special fifteen-man committee to resolve the dispute. There were five from the Senate; five from the House and five from the Supreme Court. The popular press noted there just happened to be eight Republicans and seven Democrats. Boy, what cynics those press guys were!!

But, after careful deliberations the committee amazed critics by awarding all nineteen votes from the four different states to the Republican - Hayes. The vote on each of the states was close -- eight to seven. Thus, Hayes became the Prez, with 185 votes to Tilden's 184. Just one more Electoral Vote than needed.

P.S. I love the random censorship of the board lately. First my sig, then suddenly I can't say shit or bitch, but fuck is still on the table? What gives? ****? Whore? pig******?

P.S.S. Ooooohhh-I get it. I can't say "Bitch" in the title, but it's totally legit within the thread. I can say fuck, but not ******? KuNt is clearly offlimits. **********s.

Posted by Arbiter on Mar-03-2008 16:34:

I know that some of those filters have been around for a long, long time. They don't like "faggots" either.

As long as they aren't out of control, I don't mind them. I've seen a few boards where you can even normally write words like "drape" because they don't like the word "rape." Cunt does not seem to show up as part of another word very often, and neither does fucker. So it doesn't tend to cause any real problems.

Still, I find that the knowledge that the filters there makes me ever-so-slightly more inclined to use the words that are filtered. Funny how that works.

Posted by Magnetonium on Mar-04-2008 00:41:

Historical lesson learned - Republicans always win the tiebreakers.