Sasha - Coma - TranceAddict Forums

TranceAddict Forums (www.tranceaddict.com/forums)
- Music Discussion
-- Sasha - Coma
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

Posted by SuspicionVandit on Mar-16-2008 19:57:

Sasha - Coma

agree?

Posted by stan229 on Mar-16-2008 20:04:

I dont get it.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-16-2008 20:10:

He's saying that Coma is just about perfect.

I disagree.

Posted by oldblue1224 on Mar-16-2008 20:18:

yeah it's nothing special

Posted by Frenkieee on Mar-16-2008 20:18:

Coma certainly ain't perfect but it it one hell of a tune. Even the folks at the bar where I work appreciate it!

Posted by Soeder on Mar-16-2008 20:20:

i see the charm in both...the bike and in Coma. Neither is perfect, but perfection is boring.

Posted by Acton on Mar-16-2008 20:25:

i think its immense, but its not quite perfect, in fact, i would probably place it there on that scale as well. One modification i would make though, would be to move Jesus behind Coma.

Coma > Jesus

Posted by lindt on Mar-16-2008 20:26:

That is about right, Coma is a great track.

Posted by humilis on Mar-16-2008 20:27:

It was great, but I got bored with it pretty soon.. I like the first 2 minutes the most

Posted by PETRAN on Mar-16-2008 21:04:

Another hellisly boring track!

1,9/10

lol

Posted by hasbone on Mar-16-2008 21:08:

easily the best of the emfire stuff.

Posted by SPANIARD on Mar-16-2008 21:31:

I appreciate the effort that was put into it. Alot of elements in the track that you can't hear unless you hear the full version.

Posted by MrJiveBoJingles on Mar-16-2008 21:46:

I kind of wish that people would leave behind this "toss as many effects in a track as I can" phase and get back to making more musical productions.

Yeah, sure, your complicated assembly of glitches, delays, noise washes, distortion, and stutters tickles my ears, and it interests me as a producer...but it doesn't really move me.

Posted by SYSTEM-J on Mar-16-2008 21:49:

To be honest, by Sasha's standards this doesn't sound like a track with a lot of attention to detail. Quite the opposite, really: it's as stripped down as I've yet heard Sasha's own releases.

Posted by Neon Sky on Mar-16-2008 21:57:

Imo its a decent track, 7/10

Posted by SMC on Mar-16-2008 23:28:

Absolutely massive track.

Posted by flavdave on Mar-16-2008 23:48:

6/10

Posted by RapidFire on Mar-16-2008 23:53:

i love it.

Posted by Clovis on Mar-17-2008 00:09:

Three's Dub >>>>>>>

Posted by distant on Mar-17-2008 00:12:

quote:
Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles
I kind of wish that people would leave behind this "toss as many effects in a track as I can" phase and get back to making more musical productions.

Yeah, sure, your complicated assembly of glitches, delays, noise washes, distortion, and stutters tickles my ears, and it interests me as a producer...but it doesn't really move me.

My thoughts exactly.

Coma-inducing.

Posted by iammesol on Mar-17-2008 00:47:

Beautiful track, more to put you in a coma than to get you going. If you put it in peaktime it would absolutely destroy any night (in a bad way).

Posted by JLP on Mar-17-2008 00:52:

quote:
Originally posted by SMC
Absolutely massive track.

Posted by Nostalgic on Mar-17-2008 01:17:

Snoozefest.

Posted by miamitranceman on Mar-17-2008 03:16:

quote:
Originally posted by Nostalgic
Snoozefest.

+1

Boring.

Posted by Mr.Mystery on Mar-17-2008 03:21:

I just can't make up my mind whether I like it or not. On one hand it has this really great atmosphere throughout, but at the same time it doesn't really go anywhere...

Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »